Posts by irock

Yea the X700 without the hypermemory is pretty nice... and since dv4000 has a relatively low-res (1280x800), X700 should handle anything at max details easily.

So I take it there's no hypermemory... i went to the local HP store and found these specs... http://h50025.www5.hp.com/hpcom/hk_e...55summary.html

You say that again? you call me a hardcore... lol... I probably am... but i am looking forward to play games released in late-2005. X700 128MB is an absolute minimum. Try 'FEAR' or Age of Empire 3 at 1280x800. I was thinking of...

I was wondering whether games will suffer from the slow ATA HDD. Or does DV4000 have SATA?

Pls see topic.

The X600 is actually pretty lame... for a new lappy purchase. X700 is considered the entry-level for decent gaming. I'm so glad the new dv4000 doesn't use the lame hyper-memory. 1280x800 is actually a low res... so presumably...

Yea i know... the dv4000 looks pretty slick to me. B/c it has ExpressCard and bunch of USB ports. What other features did I miss?

Hey guys have you heard of the new HP Pavilion dv4000? It now got the new ATI Mobility Radeon X700 128MB... and it's as fast as Ferrari X700 according to PCMag benchmark. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759...129TX1K0000530 What...

Running FPS at 1680 x 1050 will most likely tax on most modern mobile GPU. I was hoping of lowering from 1680 to 1440 x something to strike a balance between high res and performance. I asked around today, and local computer...

Head to widescreengaming forum. Those guys have a bunch of workaround.