I have never seen a direct comparison like that, however I think it would look slightly poorer by scaling down the resolution to 1440x900 as compared to one made for that resolution. Not significantly poorer, but a little.
However, if...
Believe me buddy, I am by no means saying 1920x1200 is bad. I understand more pixels means more detail is less area, resulting in a sharper picture. However I still really don't think 1440x900 is at all "blurry". Less...
Quote:
Originally Posted by techadventures
wow....you are something else.....I happen to be a A+, Network+ certified and I own my own computer company.....what do you have?....sorry about the run on sentence, I didn't...
Quote:
Originally Posted by burghblast
1. 1920x1200 pixels aren't "more than supposed to be" on a 15.4" screen. They're exactly the right amount, IMO. Anything less looks blurry and grainy to me, and you...
Quote:
Originally Posted by techadventures
....Thats kind of odd.....who cares if it is not a desktop replacement or that its suppose to be a balance between portability and power....then having a 2.5ghz processor with a...
Well to each their own, the TS shouldn't let others persuade them because its all opinion.
Mine for example:
The thing I don't get about the 1920x1200 resolution on a 15.4" screen (other than the fact that it is the native...
If they do release a new Model this year (which there isn't really anything to suggest whether the will or wont) I would say it wouldn't be until the fall. The reason for this is that they will want to wait until Intel releases all of...
I would have went for the LED over the 1920x1200. Unless you do intense graphics/video editing and plan on watching lots of movies (blu-ray at that) then the 1920x1200 will just be plain overkill, especially on a 15" screen. And...