Quote:
Originally Posted by mugabe
ok, i know i said that was my final question but, hey
is there likely to be any performance benefit in using RMClock over CHC or vice versa? i know they'll both undervolt to the same...
Quote:
Originally Posted by cubensis
Guys I already have it. XPS Gen 3 it is a Pentium M Dual Core, with the Yonah chipset, 4gb of ram, and a geforce 7800xt with 512 ram, dual mode blueray/hdDVD rewriter and Wi-Max but...
Quote:
Originally Posted by artfuldodger73
I have to agree as well. Never send money orders or do cash transactions unless you are meeting face to face. Actually, I've also been scammed... I sold my laptop as buy-it-now...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kakaze
What more details do you need? 420 megahertz is not a big jump at all.
well, I though that 30% increase in well noticeable. Am I wrong?
Just linking here another thread on this forum which discusses TM3000's:
http://www.notebookforums.com/showthread.php?t=83714
@ivanilia, thanks again for the nice review.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kakaze
You won't really see much of a change going from 1.25 to 1.67.
It's interesting point! I would appreciate if you give more details.
Perhaps I had to save a couple of...
Hi,
continuing our previous discussion about the undervolting of ULVs.
Someone actually has done it with the following results:
Quote:
0.7v @ 600 Mhz (6x100, the minimum voltage available in RMClock) - more than...
