Posts by clint_eastwood

i use the linux version, and its great... be warned however that some MS Office docuemtns with heavy formatting dont quite look how they should..

someone asked about the screens.. they re both svga... running in 1400x1050 not sure why you re havin a problem with the keyboard - i would give them a call.. they both get a hot at the bottom... maybe nc8000 even more so than...

this goes for the t41 but i assume it is the same for the other thinkpads: the "hidden" partition can be setup to be seen in the bios... you can even get rid of it and get yourself 3GB of space... the recovery (i hate...

i saw a few questions about t41 and the nc8000 so perhaps this might help someone... i ve got both t41 (work) and nc8000... when i have some time, will try to do a fuller comparison between the two.. but here is a few...

which model did you get? what are the specs on it?.. i paid 3350 $cad.. but that was at the end of november when they just came out.. mine is 1.6Mhz, 512MB ram (1 chip), 64 radeon 9600, 40GB@5400 rpm hdd.. im just curious where you...

i ran it on nc8000 with 1.6Mhz cpu, 64MB radeon, 512MB RAM, 40GB hdd@5400rmp, XP pro SP1.. standard HP drivers.. . vid card is (over-)clocked at 364/216Mhz... i finished the demo at 1400x1050 resolution wiht all the details set to...

be careful with these warranties from future shop/compusmart/compucetnre... its is sometimes difficult to deal with them, and often they take their sweet time when servicing.... it is usually better (NOT ALWAYS) to deal directly with...

no.. there was no *magic* partitions.. i made sure of that before i bought it.. xp pro SP1 was preinstalled but hp provided a CD with a full version.. they also gave me a CD with all the drivers and some utilities... i tried...

i ve got the nc8000 with 1.6Mhz, 512MB, 40G hard drive.. im not sure exactly what you mean by "stable".. that would probably depend on the OS you are running on it and what you are doing with it.. i have had very positive...

"better" is somewhat relative here... if you ever plan to install linux on your machine along side windows (perhaps for work - or just to try), you are better off sticking with fat32...