Originally Posted by Pirx
No, that is on two different systems, both of them state-of-the-art (you know, 2.3+GHz dual-core, RAID0 disk subsystems, the works). And, no, it is not the actual booting that takes that...
The one place where my Vista-equipped m1530 is letting me down (a bit) is in disk performance.
I read up on it: Vista is basically 'teh suck' with disk performance.
However, Vista's Service Pack 1 will fix that--I saw the benchmarks.
No, I meant like, for a stupid example, MS Excel. If he runs the 32-bit version of the software, it will actually run slower on Vista64. Something about having to do some sort of translation from 32-bit to 64-bit.
Originally Posted by HaCKs
Well this sucks, I make the poll to try and make up my mind, and there are almost PERFECTLY even results.
Pick one, try it. If you don't like it, switch. Either that, or setup a...
A bit old (from February of last year) bit it compares five setups: Vista clean, Vista Upgrade stripped, Vista Upgrade, XP Stripped, XP. Synthetic and game benchmarks.
Note no SP1...