Posts by MagicRobin

You have a point gsferrari about defective LCD screens. I never had a single laptop with a stuck or dead pixel, but the very fact that a few corporations offer a no dead-pixel warranty for a hefty price is not normal. Customers are...

Quote: Originally Posted by ec4912 I believe it is a fact. I have an old Thinkpad 1400 i series. Pentium 266 MHz with MMX, 64 MB RAM, 4 GB. Hello partner. Too bad I wasn't as lucky as you were with your...

Quote: Originally Posted by thestudent if you've got shit and you think it's heaven then you are in heaven because no one else can tell you that you're not in heaven as you are already so sure of...

Quote: Originally Posted by simscitizen to the guy The "guy" is a registered user that has a name on the left of his posts Quote: above who is raving about is nc8000, I am...

I consider 1200x800 to be big enough, but if you like high resolutions, there are 15" laptops with WSXGA+ (1680x1050) resolutions. The Asus W1N, for instance, but there are others.

Not only the Mobility. From day one ATI has released drivers programmed by 3 years old dyslexic frogs. EDIT: Typo

Quote: Originally Posted by aamsel My problem has been with the LCD's I have seen in them. Very dim, bad viewing angles. The new trend, i.e. wet screens with QWXGA+ resolutions, is not too satisfying either. No...

WXGA is a decent resolution, it's a little awkard but it's reasonably comfortable. Anyway, it's more comfortable than a SXGA+ screen. I agree with you, though, XGA is the perfect size for a 15". When it comes to widescreen, I...

Quote: Originally Posted by dlove And if no one cares what their laptop looks like then why are people complaining that Thinkpads are "fugly" , again who cares, it's a simple design, no frills, why bother...

Quote: Originally Posted by Benji99 MagicRobin: The I series were crap. At the time, IBM made the T, A and X series themselves (All were top notch quality), the I series was made cheaply by the Chinese/Taiwanese...