Posts by BlinKSilver

Quote: Originally Posted by pygo Thanks for the article it made for a nice read, but just doesn't relate this discussion, as it talks about DDR and desktops which are overclockable. These points need to be adressed...

http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=873 intel chips are less latency dependent the AMD chips. and pygo, have you tried the same driver version and patch, i would just like to make sure once and for all.

the japanesse version says 6400.....

2*(EG2)=GMA the EG2 score about 2000 on 3dmark2000, i kid you not.

i think its unlikely as was well, but no one here has tested the exact setup so who is to say otherwise.

just get me that bios and the s460 will come with it too I have one form a chembook, but i am to scared to try it, the sony one on the otherhand, i wouldn't mind.

don't worry, it was never 6.5 hr with the 460 ;-)

3:45 wireless on with undervolt, standard battery.

no I thought it was stll the same............ Any reason I should be thinking the other way?

DDR2 is at a higher latency, which has historcally been a problem of AMD chips, but not really one for intel chips, so if your running intel (as well all are) then yes I would say that DDR2 533 is Better then DDR 400.