Posts by scottman

If you compare this card to other integrated video from the recent past, it is a 10. But if you compare it to the top of the line cards out there right now, it is a 2. Few current games will need better, but if you are mainly looking...

Don't get your hopes up about upgrading to an express54 or pci slot graphics card. I haven't been following it lately, but from what I have seen so far, the mxm or comparable ati modular graphics add-ins would require a different...

Bad video card or bad display connection, I don't know. Either way, you should send it in to get fixed under warranty, unless you want to tear it apart yourself (risking warranty) and check for loose connections first.

Quote: Originally Posted by LCountach I would like to point something out. Actually HP did advertise the system as a 939 socket. Where you might ask. They offer the 4000+. You can't get the 4000+ in socket 754 because...

Nesmira did a great job of finally giving us concrete info. If only HP support could do the same. Pastkev, can you also activate my username on zv6000forums (scottman). The activation email was blank, so I was never able to...

Doom 3 won't work well on an r4000 no matter what you do to it. The video card is not meant for high-end gaming. But if you really want to know...I did a search and found this: The frame rate in Doom 3 can be displayed by entering...

There will be a difference, but I doubt it will be big enough of a difference for you to complain about. It would mainly affect program or file load times. Just surfing the web and working within most programs shouldn't need much disk...

Quote: Originally Posted by Ender88 I recently bought an r4000 with amd 64 3200+ and one 512 stick. I would like to add another 512 stick, but i do not know what to do because i don't understand all the terms...

I guess it's been long enough that the new generation of owners has arrived. These 9300 screen polls and threads were done to death about 3 months ago...but it's good to see how the current situation is.

But I thought the whole idea behind AMD using those numbers was to compare it to a pentium 4. Should the Sempron ratings be compared to a Celeron then?