Posts by StuartV666

Quote: Originally posted by mackol [b]can ya'll give ur 2 cents on my configurations i am a super broke student who is gonna be taking a "parent loan" to buy a 5680. i am really hoping that the notebook will make...

Quote: Originally posted by Adam@PCTorque I'm guessing you probably know, but just so nobody is confused, there is no 4X DVD burner on the market in an internal mobile build size. The fastest internal mobile -R is a 2X...

Quote: Originally posted by Robert602 I was told by mesh (uk sager) that this was because sony had acquired exclusive rights to the 16.1" uxgas for their vaios, and I think clevo is now looking for different suppliers,...

Quote: Originally posted by Ron Jeremy Is there any word on the future availability of the following items for the 8890: 1) 16" UXGA screen I'd really like to know about this also. I actually broke down...

Adam, Can you yet answer the question about max. resolution when running dual head? I.e. Can you run the 8887X with a dual head setup, where each monitor is running at 1600x1200? Thus, giving 3200x1200 resolution, or 1600x2400...

Quote: Originally posted by Direwolf "StuartV666" What atbear was talking about was the acer and dell wont be able to compete with sager at all when the springsdale chipset comes out with the prescote and m10...

Quote: Originally posted by atbear You already know.... 800FSB, 3.06HT, M10.... Can you order that today? If not, then you already know... 1.6GHz FSB, 4.53 MHz HT CPU, M12, 14000 3DMarks... You can *always*...

And I'll be dipped if Toshiba isn't right there, too, with the new Tecra S1. Also, Centrino-compatible. 6 pounds(!) with a 14" screen and 3.something hour battery. More with a 15" screen (UXGA) and a 5.something hour...

Quote: Originally posted by Dekka I think the Latitude D800 from DELL may just be "for now" the 2.8GHZ Sager killer. And you can get it with an UltraSharp WUXGA screen (1920x1200). And you can get it...

SUPPOSEDLY, the 40/5400 and the 60/4200 are about the same performance. The 60's slower spindle speed is made up for by its higher data density on the platters. I.e. it spins slower, but more data passes under the read/write heads on...