Intel 320 Series 120 GB SATA 3.0 Gb-s 2.5-Inch Solid-State Drive Review

A Review On: Intel 320 Series 120 GB SATA 3

Intel 320 Series 120 GB SATA 3

Rated # 2 in Notebook Storage
See all 1 reviews
Recent Pricing:
Purchased on:
Price paid: $220.00
mb67
Posted · 0 Views · 11 Comments

Pros: Fast, Reliable

Cons: Cost

Here is my quick write up of the Intel 320 Series 120GB SSD that I purchased as a replacement for my 500GB mechanical HDD in my AW M11X.

After researching hard drives, (Lots of info out there as to the performance of the latest drives) I found that if I wanted a fast, reliable Solid State hard drive one of the best places to look is at Intel's line of SSD's. I chose the 120GB model as a minimum capacity for my needs-It allows more than enough room for the OS and programs/software that I plan on using on this laptop, plus it has 'room to grow' should I need it. True, one could get away with a smaller capacity and save some money, but in my opinion the sweet spot is around 100GB.

Installation is a breeze, as long as you have that high tech tool known as a Phillips Head Screwdriver. tongue.gif Pull off the back panel, undo a couple of screws, replace the mechanical hdd with the SSD, tighten the screws back up and put the back panel on, and you're done! If only life were so simple. laugh4.gif

One thing that I need to stress before loading the OS and so on is that make sure you have all of your drivers handy, and if possible make a list of the order in which to re-install them. Some systems are finicky (Such as certain AW models) and they might not take too kindly to an SSD right away. Fortunately, I had a list and the process was buttery smooth as it only took just a little over 8 minutes to get Windows 7 Ultimate loaded onto the SSD from the DVD. ohmy.gif

With that being said, all I have left to say is Wow! What a difference this SSD makes from the 500GB mechanical HDD. w00t.gif Even though I read about the differences in speed, until you actually see it in person do you then realize just how quick and responsive everything is. I'm going to post a couple of screen shots of the benchmarking that I performed, comparing the mechanical to the SSD so that numbers-wise you can get an idea as to the performance of this drive.

Mechanical HDD first-

th_587913242_500GBMechanicalBench_122_549lo.jpg

And here are the SSD's results-

th_815597545_SSDBench2_122_51lo.jpg th_816744498_CrystalMark_122_698lo.jpg



Also, I did a time comparison: From Power Off to Windows Login Screen took the Mechanical HDD 42 Seconds. The SSD did it in 24 Seconds. Keep in mind that your mileage may vary as my mechanical HDD is nearly full and the SSD isn't. As you can see, there is a dramatic difference in performance. But as with all things performance based, 'You Must Pay To Play'. Cost is still a prohibitive factor; you could get two (or even three) 500GB mechanical HDD's for the same price as one 120GB SSD.

So in conclusion, my take on the Intel 320 Series 120GB SSD is that I'm now hooked on SSD's for my main (OS) drive and I will never go back. One thing that I didn't mention previously is that an SSD will make you rethink how you store your extraneous data- I still use external mechanical drives for all of my media, as you can't beat the capacity/price point, but no longer will I keep all of that data on the main OS drive. In the near future I plan on consolidating all of that media onto a NAS that can be accessed from anywhere as I tend to travel quite a bit, but that will be a review for another time. wink.gif

11 Comments

Is there a certain constraint on "old" systems that would make an investment in SSD a waste of money? Or is it in general if you have SATA drive currently, moving to SSD would be the best choice?

cheers ...
I guess it kind of depends upon A) how old of a system you are talking about, and B) How important it is to upgrade and breathe new life into the system. Personally, I think that the older the system is the less likely you would need an SSD, as the cost is a huge factor. Now there are smaller capacity SSD's out there and that might be an option for older laptops, as the cost is a little more reasonable.
From what I have seen so far, unless the current system can support at least SATA 2.0 or above, an investment in an SSD might be a bit overkilled, unless one downloads and/or does a lot of video editing.

But true, I am looking into a smaller SSD and as you mentioned, using externals for back up.

cheers ...
Good point about the SATA 2 support. Anything older than that then one should consider getting the most capacity mechanical HDD they can.
I agree with Q on the SATA II support being a minimum. I first installed my SSD to a system with SATA I and while the was still a difference, it wasn't as dramatic as when I installed it to its current home- a netbook with SATA II support.
Something I forgot to do, and just now completed: I timed the boot up- From power off to Windows login screen, the mechanical HDD took 42 Seconds. The Intel 320 SSD took 24 seconds. I'm going to add that to the review.
Hmm. $220.00 and 113MB write speed seems a bit low. What was the rated speed of this?
130 MB/s is the rated maximum write speed. 113 MB/s isn't that far off, and the ATTO results show it peaking at 123 MB/s, which is reasonably within spec.
I re-did the benches and got a little higher after un-installing the Intel RST. Curious actually...
I know intel SSDs tend to be pricier, but I know that Intel usually has like the best stuff available. would you say you get your bang for your buck compared to any other SSD's you have tried before?
Not sure if you're aware, but there is aknown issue with the 320 series ssds where the size of the drive gets reduced to 8MB. Back up your data and wait for the fix from Intel.