Benchmark: G1 Benchmark (overclocked) ... was about to buy a g1, this helps ;D

GenTechPC · 12-20-2006, 02:41 AM

stock driver no overclock:

3DMark05:

3DMark06:

stock driver overclocked with ATI Tools:

3DMark05:

3DMark06:

Djembe · 12-20-2006, 03:06 AM

hmmm... seems to be just a bit under the A8Js if I recall correctly. I wonder why

and happy thousandth post!

GenTechPC · 12-20-2006, 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Djembe

hmmm... seems to be just a bit under the A8Js if I recall correctly. I wonder why

and happy thousandth post!

The overclock seems doesn't have much improve on 3DMark05 no matter how much I overclocked and I don't know why, but 3DMark06 improve a lot.

ashveratu · 12-21-2006, 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Djembe

hmmm... seems to be just a bit under the A8Js if I recall correctly. I wonder why

and happy thousandth post!

Hrm, A8JS max/native resolution 1440x900 compared to the G1 at 1680x1050. It should not be too hard too hard to see why. (just incase you can not see why, the same GPU running at a lower resolution will perform faster)

GenTechPC · 12-21-2006, 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ashveratu

Hrm, A8JS max/native resolution 1440x900 compared to the G1 at 1680x1050. It should not be too hard too hard to see why. (just incase you can not see why, the same GPU running at a lower resolution will perform faster)

But 3DMark will set resolution to 1024X768 when run the benchmark.

ashveratu · 12-21-2006, 11:36 PM

Good call, I have never used 3D Mark or any other benchmarking tool so I will take your word. It makes sense though in order to keep the test standardized. Oh well, no idea why the A8JS clocks faster. It maybe because it is smaller and the electrons have a shorter distance to travel. <(do not take that seriously)

GenTechPC · 12-21-2006, 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ashveratu

It maybe because it is smaller and the electrons have a shorter distance to travel.

BoneYard · 12-23-2006, 11:11 AM

Noob question. Why did you use ATI tools to OC the 7700 Go rather than an Nvidia tool such as RivaTuner?

GenTechPC · 12-23-2006, 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneYard

Noob question. Why did you use ATI tools to OC the 7700 Go rather than an Nvidia tool such as RivaTuner?

I never use RivaTuner before but I'll try it next time.

AMDZen · 01-04-2007, 11:35 AM

Just use CoolBits

megaphat · 04-16-2007, 05:56 PM

Wow the 3dmark06 clocks look pretty awesome.

LouP · 05-10-2007, 07:45 AM

was about to buy a g1, this helps ;D

12-20-2006, 02:41 AM	#1
GenTechPC BF2 n00b team Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,194 Reviews: 2 Benchmarks: 4 Credits: 9,502	Benchmark: G1 Benchmark (overclocked) stock driver no overclock: 3DMark05: 3DMark06: stock driver overclocked with ATI Tools: 3DMark05: 3DMark06: __________________ Ken Lee service@gentechpc.com 1.800.990.7945 Mon~Fri Last edited by GenTechPC; 12-20-2006 at 02:48 AM.

12-20-2006, 03:06 AM	#2
Djembe drum while you work Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: online Posts: 22,891 Reviews: 5 Benchmarks: 50 Credits: 138,903	hmmm... seems to be just a bit under the A8Js if I recall correctly. I wonder why and happy thousandth post! __________________ Notebook Forums Moderator & Administrator 590 bans and counting...

01-04-2007, 11:35 AM	#10
AMDZen I haz a Karr0t !!! Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Dεnvεr Posts: 1,253 Credits: 170	Just use CoolBits __________________ Gaming Rig AMD Opteron 146 @ 2700 (270x10) 2x1024 PC4000 Crucial Ballistix 3-2-3-6 eVGA 7800GT @ 500 Core and 640/1280 RAM HTPC AMD 2500+ Athlon XP-M @ 2433 (11.5x212) Abit NF7-S v2.0 2x512 PC3200 Corsair XMS Platinum Series 2-2-2-5 MSI 9800 Pro @ 460 Core and 380/760 RAM 5 x HDD's with 1.14 TeraBytes of Space Soon to be Mobile Machine ASUS G1 from GenTechPC

04-16-2007, 05:56 PM	#11
megaphat Registered User Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 388 Credits: -169	Wow the 3dmark06 clocks look pretty awesome. __________________ i9300 2ghz 1.16v \| 2Gb Single Stick \| Dual 100gb 7200rpm, 5400rpm \| 7800 go gtx (445/1230) \| 1920*1200 Samsung no dead pixels! Extras: carbon fibre cover\|9 cell\|backpack\|Car charger XPS M1210 \| 1.66 Core Duo \| 7400 505/990 \| 1.5Gb \| 60Gb 7200rpm

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Notebooks For Sale

User Links

Latest Pricing

Top Posters

Todays Top Posters

Fastest Benchmarks

Latest Benchmarks

12-21-2006, 11:36 PM	#6
ashveratu Registered User Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2 Credits: -350	Good call, I have never used 3D Mark or any other benchmarking tool so I will take your word. It makes sense though in order to keep the test standardized. Oh well, no idea why the A8JS clocks faster. It maybe because it is smaller and the electrons have a shorter distance to travel. <(do not take that seriously)

12-23-2006, 11:11 AM	#8
BoneYard Registered User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Colorado Posts: 19 Credits: -144	Noob question. Why did you use ATI tools to OC the 7700 Go rather than an Nvidia tool such as RivaTuner?

05-10-2007, 07:45 AM	#12
LouP Noobie =[ Join Date: May 2007 Location: Kenilworth, NJ Posts: 29 Credits: -99	was about to buy a g1, this helps ;D

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Overclocked E1705/9400 7900 GS Benchmark Results	FlashSVT	Dell Home (Inspiron, XPS, Studio)	740	11-03-2008 10:23 PM
Benchmark: F3JP Benchmark ATI X1700	GenTechPC	Asus Notebook Benchmarks	19	04-04-2007 06:14 PM
Benchmark: Z62F CoreDUO 1.66ghz Encode Benchmark	DLMunson	Asus Notebook Benchmarks	2	03-27-2006 01:53 AM
Benchmark: Asus Z62F Benchmark	GenTechPC	Asus Notebook Benchmarks	33	03-17-2006 12:44 PM