NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Sager & Clevo Notebook Forums › Sager & Clevo Notebooks › Sager 5680 with 865PE chipset enabling PAT (Perf Acceleration Tech) on motherboard?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sager 5680 with 865PE chipset enabling PAT (Perf Acceleration Tech) on motherboard? - Page 2

post #21 of 96
11/18/03 at 7:51pm
Now I am getting worried. I wonder how much I can O/C my 3.2 without blowing it to bits. Where's my Artic Silver...
Reply
Reply
post #22 of 96
11/18/03 at 8:11pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie
Now I am getting worried. I wonder how much I can O/C my 3.2 without blowing it to bits. Where's my Artic Silver...
Ordering some now as i read this. Henrik, i never figured out why my 8890 gives me the weird temp readings. No ideas yet?
Reply
Reply
post #23 of 96
11/18/03 at 9:02pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nandro
Ordering some now as i read this. Henrik, i never figured out why my 8890 gives me the weird temp readings. No ideas yet?
I can look into it if you tell me your keyboard bios version.
Reply
Reply
post #24 of 96
11/18/03 at 11:41pm
I looked in the service manual for the 5680 and the PLL chip is easily accessible compared to the 5660. The PLL chip on the 5680 is located to the left of the memory sticks. Beeing a tweaker, it makes me wonder why noone have seen this before Could someone with a 5680 verify that the PLL chip is ICS 952618BF?
Reply
Reply
post #25 of 96
11/18/03 at 11:54pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henrik
I looked in the service manual for the 5680 and the PLL chip is easily accessible compared to the 5660. The PLL chip on the 5680 is located to the left of the memory sticks. Beeing a tweaker, it makes me wonder why noone have seen this before Could someone with a 5680 verify that the PLL chip is ICS 952618BF?
Ive got some honeydoos ATM, give me about an hour and Ill take a look.

Jeff
Reply
Reply
post #26 of 96
11/19/03 at 12:20am
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffinFlorida
Ive got some honeydoos ATM, give me about an hour and Ill take a look.

Jeff
Yes, it is a 952618BF - confirmed. What exactly does this mean for us?

Jeff
Reply
Reply
post #27 of 96
11/19/03 at 12:29am
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffinFlorida
Yes, it is a 952618BF - confirmed. What exactly does this mean for us?

Jeff
http://www.cpuid.com/download/CG-ICS952607.zip

That is what he found - interesting. Common chip used on many machines it seems and it close to what we have. I have mine SAYING that its running at 3.0 now (I have a 2.8). Let me runs some benchmarks and Ill get back to you.

Jeff
Reply
Reply
post #28 of 96
11/19/03 at 1:01am
also subscribing..... whatever happened to the subscribe button?
Reply
Reply
post #29 of 96
11/19/03 at 1:17am
I seem to be a real pessimist in this thread but I suggest you dont keep your hopes too high. The ICS 952607 is a 48 pin chip and the chip on the mobo have 56 pins. Probably the ICS 952618BF is more similar to ICS 952601 or ICS 952623. By looking in these datasheets, you see that the supported FSB frequencys are 100,133,166 and 200. Also, the FSB are set by the pins and are not programmable. However, there exists a "test mode" and other functions than the FSB are programmable so maybe there are some things that are tweakable. I have to study the data sheet some more.
Reply
Reply
post #30 of 96
11/19/03 at 1:23am
Well, I changed it to read 3.1 and 3DMark03 did show it running at 3.1. Ran the test.

at 2.8 it was 2862
at 3.1 it was 2882

ran it twice and it was within 5 marks.

So it seems to have done SOMETHING. Henrik - give me an idea of what else to test and Ill let you know.

Jeff
Reply
Reply
post #31 of 96
11/19/03 at 1:29am
Jeff, I think this difference of 20 points can be regarded as normal variation of the results in 3DMark03. Also, 3Dmark03 benchmarks the GPU, not the CPU. Download Sisoft Sandra and bench the cpu.
Reply
Reply
post #32 of 96
11/19/03 at 3:14am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henrik
Jeff, I think this difference of 20 points can be regarded as normal variation of the results in 3DMark03. Also, 3Dmark03 benchmarks the GPU, not the CPU. Download Sisoft Sandra and bench the cpu.
WHile correct, a .3ghz bump will give at least 120 points more (it WILL have SOME effect.. it is only MOSTLY GPU)..

But yeah.. 20 points is purely random variation..
Reply
Reply
post #33 of 96
11/19/03 at 3:20am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Divine_Madcat
WHile correct, a .3ghz bump will give at least 120 points more (it WILL have SOME effect.. it is only MOSTLY GPU)..

But yeah.. 20 points is purely random variation..
Run for a third time and got 2869 at 2.8 - checking sandra now.

Jeff
Reply
Reply
post #34 of 96
11/19/03 at 3:24am

Fsb 220 !!!

Hello all !

You must restart your Windows to reconized the new clockspeed,some benchmarks did show the same value because they calaulate wrong,restart and bench again and you see the differenz,the pll can programmed in 1Mhz stepp´s !GREAT !
220 FSB is the maximum,after that the pci audio will failed !
what a great maschine the 5680 !
HT,FSB 880,PAT and M10P with 420Mhz Core and 250Memory !!!
now we need only a little tool to get all changes in one together,the pll prg,the pat registers,the temp readings.
i am working ! ......
Reply
Reply
post #35 of 96
11/19/03 at 3:32am
To the people who are working on this:

1 you are so good

2 where do you learn stuff like this?

3 so good
Reply
Reply
post #36 of 96
11/19/03 at 4:03am
Henrik - Warp8 - Looks like its a go!

I had to reboot like warp8 said

2.8 8695 mips 3542/6192
3.1 9562 mips 3859/6810

Im going to go back and run 3dmark03 too.

Memory bandwidth was also way up. The problem I see is that if I go too high, or have a problem that prevents me from booting, I might not be able to change it back.

But at any rate - it seems that a 2.8 will run at 3.1, np. All of the multipliers seem locked - I think that was expected.

How do I monitor the internal temperature?

Jeff
Reply
Reply
post #37 of 96
11/19/03 at 4:14am
That was great news for you 5680 owners Jeff, I guess if you unplug the computer from AC and battery, it will revert to stock fsb. The temp monitor is here.
Reply
Reply
post #38 of 96
11/19/03 at 4:24am
Wait, Im lost...did anyone succeed in turning on Performance Mode?
Reply
Reply
post #39 of 96
11/19/03 at 4:28am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shackman
Wait, Im lost...did anyone succeed in turning on Performance Mode?
Who cares! PAT is worthless compaired to overclocking!
Reply
Reply
post #40 of 96
11/19/03 at 4:29am
No, but better .3 overclock and then some!

Jeff
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Sager & Clevo Notebooks
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Sager & Clevo Notebook Forums › Sager & Clevo Notebooks › Sager 5680 with 865PE chipset enabling PAT (Perf Acceleration Tech) on motherboard?