Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thorndt
Just a general note: anything which speeds up access to main RAM is a good thing (tm). That's why caches were designed--to make up for slow main memory (and hard drives). I can't offhand show benchmark differences between, say, the 400 MHz and 533 MHz fsb versions of the 1.6 GHz Pentium M...anyone have a link?
|
My test results from another thread are below:
Partial Results:
Kingston 6000A 512MB 533FSB 4200 chips were used.
single-channel ( 1 533 4200 512MB chip):
Memory read: 3292
Memory Write: 746
Latency: 109.2
dual channel (2 533 4200 512MB chips):
Memory read: 3313
Memory Write: 818
Latency: 103.7
Everest correctly reports no dual channel when there is one chip only, and correctly reports dual channel when both chips are present.
Now, tests vs. real-life performance:
My top desktop system has 3.42Ghz P4 ( 2.4 overclocked of course) and 2 dual channel Geil Golden Dragon 800FSB 512MB RAM. Dual channel is very much in action on that machine, HT is on so there are two logical CPU's which software that aware of multi-cpu machines can use. Hard drive is Seagate 160GB 7200 RPM.
.. and as I've mentioned in my other post, MainConcepts MPEG2 encoding of the 19 min 54 sec AVI clip to MPEG2 took 38 min 03 sec on the desktop PC and just 32 min on my 6000D.
6000D is an excellent laptop, at least for my purposes.
Cheers.