New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Zone alarm pro...or? - Page 4

post #61 of 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redmumba
The same reason Glare Type screens are for--easy cleaning. 8)



You should realize that your router won't block, say, an email born virus; and if that virus launches a DDoS attack from your computer, Windows Firewall and Router both will do nothing. This is especially true considering just recently, hackers had a sort of international "contest" to see who could create the biggest botnet. Just so you know, antivirus and antispyware don't always stop everything.
I do realize this - which is precisely why I mentioned the importance of antivirus / antispyware protection. Sure if you are unlucky enough to get hit with something very new - your virus / spyware signatures might not be up to date enought to spot it. But the chances for that are fairly low considering how often most vendors update their signatures (assuming you stay up to date on that sort of thing). And in the event that a virus/worm does get past your antivirus/antispyware protection it is possible that it could be smart enough to deactivate and/or rewrite your firewall software so as to render it useless.
post #62 of 84
Uh, no. My laptops are always online, no problems.

Quote:
Originally Posted by odious_m
As long as you stay off the internet, you should be fine.
post #63 of 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by anettis
Wireless does present additional exposure - but even still as long as you implement WEP or WPA I think that the risk is managable.
You're right, of course. But I subscribe to the "layered defenses" school of thought. If the enemy breaches your outer gates, he has to then take on your inner gate.
post #64 of 84
The entire point is why not just use Windows Firewall anyway? It's non-existent once you give your programs access and gives some level of protection.
post #65 of 84
Thread Starter 
windows firewall just doesnt seem like enough to me, I actually didnt even know it was there. I like to have a 3rd party with options..going to the school I wasnt so much worried about outside hacks and viruses but the people at the school spreading worms and such to my computer. I am thinking about getting NOD32 so im safe at school zone alarm pro seems to be my best bet right now.
post #66 of 84
^ Zone Alarm free should be adequate. But if you've got the money....
post #67 of 84
Thread Starter 
I already have zone alarm pro
post #68 of 84
I was talking about thorndt, who said he didn't use any software firewall, which seems a little crazy in this day and age.
post #69 of 84
Thread Starter 
o ok my bad k6
post #70 of 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by stev310
I already have zone alarm pro
Sorry, man. It's been quite a few beers since your original post....
post #71 of 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. K6
I was talking about thorndt, who said he didn't use any software firewall, which seems a little crazy in this day and age.
?????
Where did you get that?!?
I use norton (came free w/ 1.5 year subscription).

Normally I use AVG + Kerio Personal Firewall...
post #72 of 84
I think he meant FearNo1....
post #73 of 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by anettis
Wireless does present additional exposure - but even still as long as you implement WEP or WPA I think that the risk is managable.
I setup my router to only let certain mac addresses use it. Is there any benefit to using WEP above that? (My router doesn't use WPA which I've read is better than WEP)
post #74 of 84
Mac addresses can be spoofed. Yes it helps and its a good start but you should also enable WEP (or better) and do not broadcast your SSID (you did change it already right )
post #75 of 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draconis77
I setup my router to only let certain mac addresses use it. Is there any benefit to using WEP above that? (My router doesn't use WPA which I've read is better than WEP)
As Adrenolin said MAC addresses can be spoofed, so it is still a good idea implement WPA or WEP. But perhaps even more importantly without encryption you are sending data that can be picked up and decoded by anyone within transmission range if they have proper equipment / software. So even if they did not spoof your MAC address they could potentially pick up data packets and interrogate them for valuable information you may be sending to / receiving from the Internet.
post #76 of 84
Nope, we're all wrong, I meant anettis, sorry guys *slaps head*

I just don't understand why you wouldn't turn on SP2 firewall anyway, anettis, it's free and offers a layer of protection in case something does get by your router.
post #77 of 84
I would like to point out that I am not wrong - Mr. K6. There is really no absolute right or wrong when it comes to how to configure a PC for security - rather it is a matter of opinion. And one's opinion is based on how comfortable they are with technology, what risk they are willing to accept, how many people are using the LAN in question, etc. When behind a router with SPI firewall on my own private LAN (where I am the only user) I simply don't feel it is worth the overhead of running a software based firewall. There is "some" overhead (granted it is very slight) plus there is configuration management for certain applications such as hosting a gaming server, peer to peer, etc. I perfer to keep this sort of configuraiton tied to my router. In some ways a firewall router can be superior to a software firewall as the router is basically its own device with a CPU, operating system, software, etc. - and as such it is not suseptible to the standard Windows based viruses, worms, etc. that a software firewall could be impacted by. Now granted running behind both the router firewall and the Windows firewall does give you some protection, but at this time I don't feel it is really needed with my current configuration.
post #78 of 84
AH no no, I didn't mean you or anyone was wrong. We were trying to figure out who I was talking to about having no firewall and I read back and realized you had mentioned you didn't run one, i.e. we all gave "wrong" guesses to who had said that. I'm first and foremost a firm supporter of everyone having the right to express his or her opinions. I was just wondering what your basis was for not running a firewall and I see what you mean. Sorry for the miscommunication, didn't mean to upset.
post #79 of 84
No problem Mr K6! Thanks for the clarification.
post #80 of 84
Thanks for the info guys. I was figuring along those lines after thinking about it. I'll setup WEP again.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home