NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Apple Notebook Forums › Apple Notebooks › MAC OSX-x86 Benchmarks
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

MAC OSX-x86 Benchmarks

post #1 of 18
8/23/05 at 1:39pm
Thread Starter 
Hi all, im running a Mac OSX-x86 version on my Clevo 4750/D470K notebook, and i want to now what kind of benchmarks are available for the mac platform, for me to conduct some tests. Thx all c-a
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 18
8/23/05 at 1:44pm
you're talking about an x86 coded utility... xbench is the usual benchmarking software for mac. i'm not sure if they have one coded for x86 or not. u'll likely have to ask @ the Macx86 sites to find out.
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 18
8/23/05 at 1:49pm
Thread Starter 
hi thanx. i've been using PPC software without problems, like Photoshop CS2, ill give it a try. c-a
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 18
8/23/05 at 2:34pm
Thread Starter 
Hi i've tested it and here are the results:
Code:
Results\t17.80\t
\tSystem Info\t\t
\t\tXbench Version\t\t1.2
\t\tSystem Version\t\t10.4.1 (8B1025)
\t\tPhysical RAM\t\t1024 MB
\t\tModel\t\tACPI
\t\tDrive Type\t\tHTS726060M9AT00
\tCPU Test\t13.11\t
\t\tGCD Loop\t42.78\t2.26 Mops/sec
\t\tFloating Point Basic\t25.26\t600.27 Mflop/sec
\t\tvecLib FFT\t4.83\t159.41 Mflop/sec
\t\tFloating Point Library\t28.38\t4.94 Mops/sec
\tThread Test\t26.90\t
\t\tComputation\t19.80\t401.14 Kops/sec, 4 threads
\t\tLock Contention\t41.93\t1.80 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
\tMemory Test\t43.13\t
\t\tSystem\t33.15\t
\t\t\tAllocate\t88.63\t325.49 Kalloc/sec
\t\t\tFill\t25.58\t1243.79 MB/sec
\t\t\tCopy\t24.92\t514.67 MB/sec
\t\tStream\t61.71\t
\t\t\tCopy\t60.37\t1246.98 MB/sec
\t\t\tScale\t56.19\t1160.77 MB/sec
\t\t\tAdd\t65.87\t1403.27 MB/sec
\t\t\tTriad\t65.45\t1400.23 MB/sec
\tQuartz Graphics Test\t17.74\t
\t\tLine\t18.06\t1.20 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
\t\tRectangle\t11.79\t3.52 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
\t\tCircle\t14.93\t1.22 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
\t\tBezier\t36.76\t927.10 beziers/sec [50% alpha]
\t\tText\t21.07\t1.32 Kchars/sec
\tOpenGL Graphics Test\t16.67\t
\t\tSpinning Squares\t16.67\t21.15 frames/sec
\tUser Interface Test\t9.55\t
\t\tElements\t9.55\t43.85 refresh/sec
\tDisk Test\t28.12\t
\t\tSequential\t43.58\t
\t\t\tUncached Write\t42.16\t25.89 MB/sec [4K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Write\t38.03\t21.52 MB/sec [256K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Read\t59.81\t17.50 MB/sec [4K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Read\t39.92\t20.06 MB/sec [256K blocks]
\t\tRandom\t20.75\t
\t\t\tUncached Write\t7.03\t0.74 MB/sec [4K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Write\t45.15\t14.45 MB/sec [256K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Read\t70.85\t0.50 MB/sec [4K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Read\t69.77\t12.95 MB/sec [256K blocks]

thx for the help c-a
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 18
8/23/05 at 2:52pm
where can i download mac os x86? i really want to try it out!!
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 18
8/23/05 at 4:34pm
Thread Starter 
just use the current p2p or torrent sites.... for the "tiger-x86.tar" 1.28Gb version, it's the only that works, more info or news u can go here:
OSX-x86 Forum
The most experienced apple users really could give a good help....thx alll

c-a
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 18
8/24/05 at 4:32pm
The results are going to going to be next to useless though. All they show is how your processor runs under rosetta.
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 18
8/24/05 at 5:22pm
yes, hence the need for an x86 coded version of it.
Reply
Reply
post #9 of 18
8/25/05 at 12:00am
Which won't be released until x86 macs are released to retail.
Reply
Reply
post #10 of 18
8/25/05 at 3:21am
hmm, actually since checking the xbench site it looks like the latest version is a universal binary. the numbers reported here however seem a bit low, likely due to the currently unsupported hardware.
Reply
Reply
post #11 of 18
8/25/05 at 3:44am
Hey....are you running this on a amd 64 processor??? I thought it only worked for intel processors.
Reply
Reply
post #12 of 18
8/25/05 at 4:07pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by triadone
hmm, actually since checking the xbench site it looks like the latest version is a universal binary. the numbers reported here however seem a bit low, likely due to the currently unsupported hardware.

Hi, that's right it's a universal binary, and thenumbers are low, because my processor only as SSE2 instructions a and need to emulate the SSE3 instructions, the recent Athlons 64 and P4's already come with SSE3 instructions, what makes them faster. Hower im using no graphics drivers hehe, and it runs great, just some software that needs graphic acceleration wont work, as maya / cinema 4d / archicad, im still hoping to get a way to make them work, theres already a big comunity and growing everyday tweaking and modding the OSX-x86.....Off course intel and apple wont support another hardware....

Quote:
Originally Posted by knownasmichael
Hey....are you running this on a amd 64 processor??? I thought it only worked for intel processors
That's why hackers exist...................
Reply
Reply
post #13 of 18
9/4/05 at 1:32am
Here is mine:

Dell 9300 1.73MHz 2GB ram 5400rpm 80gb Seagate momentus/dual boot Osx WinX
the OSx is on an 30gb partition
*low res graphics 1280x768x32 and no wireless yet

Results48.15
System Info
Xbench Version1.2
System Version10.4.1 (8B1025)
Physical RAM2048 MB
ModelADP2,1
Drive TypeST9808211A
CPU Test25.56
GCD Loop224.6811.84 Mops/sec
Floating Point Basic44.791.06 Gflop/sec
vecLib FFT8.87292.66 Mflop/sec
Floating Point Library58.9110.26 Mops/sec
Thread Test80.60
Computation69.931.42 Mops/sec, 4 threads
Lock Contention95.124.09 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
Memory Test76.54
System79.71
Allocate146.92539.52 Kalloc/sec
Fill62.953060.96 MB/sec
Copy66.901381.88 MB/sec
Stream73.61
Copy66.771379.19 MB/sec
Scale67.521394.93 MB/sec
Add81.731741.08 MB/sec
Triad81.181736.74 MB/sec
Quartz Graphics Test74.42
Line62.794.18 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
Rectangle67.8520.26 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
Circle76.006.19 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
Bezier86.212.17 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
Text85.025.32 Kchars/sec
OpenGL Graphics Test33.36
Spinning Squares33.3642.32 frames/sec
User Interface Test95.79
Elements95.79439.63 refresh/sec
Disk Test37.12
Sequential62.07
Uncached Write47.1528.95 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write66.4737.61 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read67.8819.87 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read74.2937.34 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Random26.48
Uncached Write8.910.94 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write70.0322.42 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read70.050.50 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read97.3618.07 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Reply
Reply
post #14 of 18
9/4/05 at 1:35pm
all the drivers, wireless, lan, everything works?
Reply
Reply
post #15 of 18
9/5/05 at 1:12am
Quote:
Originally Posted by triadone
hmm, actually since checking the xbench site it looks like the latest version is a universal binary. the numbers reported here however seem a bit low, likely due to the currently unsupported hardware.
did it work on that athlon 32 or were you using on another system?
Reply
Reply
post #16 of 18
9/5/05 at 4:02am
I don't think they've optimised XBench for x86 yet. I believe their universal binary was just a straight conversion with no SSE optimisations or anything.
Reply
Reply
post #17 of 18
9/7/05 at 1:15am
If you are running an AMD processor with the SSE3 support what do you have to do to get OSX to run on your comp?
Reply
Reply
post #18 of 18
9/7/05 at 7:52pm
www.osx86project.org
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Apple Notebooks
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Apple Notebook Forums › Apple Notebooks › MAC OSX-x86 Benchmarks