|Accualy no, jsut because Nvidia has SLI doesnt mean it has better cards. Every benchmark it shows the ATi card much much higher than the 6800 Ultra.
your very wrong, thats almost 1000 points higher than the 6800 Ultra in the benchies.
Perhaps you should delve a little further and look at real world performance instead of the benchies. Benchmarks are fine if you are going to play the benchmark and not the game.
I don't know what point you are attempting to argue, but a single 7800GT or GTX (non SLI) hammers the x850. I'm not even talking 6800, ultra or otherwise (of course neither was the OP). The facts in the matter are, ATI has enjoyed a couple years on top. Their first, and nVidia's first time off the top since 3dfx days. As for the name calling simply because you don't know facts, that will be a mistake. I don't partake in arguments with fanboys that just like to flame/troll/call names when they don't know what they are talking about.
Fact: ATI has nothing to come close to nVidia right now
Fact: ATI is not on top right now, but you can wait.
Fact: When/if ATI gains the crown, you can wait again and nVidia will most likely take it back. Then you can wait again and ATI will most likely take it back take it back.
Fact: Technology doesn't evolve. Technology IS evolution.
Fact: Even the link you posted shows the real world performance of the 6800 Ultra (not even nVidia's top or second offering) being not much different ... better in some case, equal in some cases, worse in some cases ... than the x850XT (ATI's best current offering).
Am I an nVidia fanboy? most certainly not. I have two nVidia machines (the newest of which is an ancient 4600Ti), and three ATI machines. I am a realist who actually knows the facts.