To clear a few things up i think you are both right and both wrong on somethings.
I dont understand why there is so much heat here between 9300 and XPS2. We are all on the same team, so to speak. Even if Dell does not support the 7800 in the 9300 there will be postings here of people who make it work.
No one ever pays MSRP for a Dell. So comparing MSRP prices means nothing.
I paid under $350 for my XPS2 over a simmilary speced 9300.
Had I dropped my CPU, RAM, and Hard Disk and DvD burner down i could have saved over 700 more making it close to $1000 difference. However for me personally I was going to get the the 9300 as i speced my XPS2 anyway.
The reason I got the XPS2 is ...... because I could. I have a job (and a wife) that lets me afford a $2300 laptop (what i paid after taxes). Thats the main reason XPS2 owners are older. Its because those that grew up with nintendo still play games and can now afford bigger 'toys'.
I could have eaisly choosen a 9300 and been quite happy. Battery life would have been nicer.
You are correct in the money part. However there are more variables. Specifically the impact on XPS2 sales. Dell had experience with this factor with the XPS1/9100 issue. Will they repeat is one question. As pointed out Dell already limits the CPU of the 9300 to be lower than the XPS2 for no reason other than Marketing.
Its all speculation at this point anyway. But I admit its fun to speculate. Because someone is going to be right and then get bragging rights with a link to their post that had the correct answer.

I dont understand why there is so much heat here between 9300 and XPS2. We are all on the same team, so to speak. Even if Dell does not support the 7800 in the 9300 there will be postings here of people who make it work.
No one ever pays MSRP for a Dell. So comparing MSRP prices means nothing.
I paid under $350 for my XPS2 over a simmilary speced 9300.
Had I dropped my CPU, RAM, and Hard Disk and DvD burner down i could have saved over 700 more making it close to $1000 difference. However for me personally I was going to get the the 9300 as i speced my XPS2 anyway.
The reason I got the XPS2 is ...... because I could. I have a job (and a wife) that lets me afford a $2300 laptop (what i paid after taxes). Thats the main reason XPS2 owners are older. Its because those that grew up with nintendo still play games and can now afford bigger 'toys'.
I could have eaisly choosen a 9300 and been quite happy. Battery life would have been nicer.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lindy
Its money...money...money....money.
If Dell can make it work in the 9300 cheaply, and some bean counters at Dell say “you have X amount of 9300 owners (way more than XPS2 owners) and of them 35% will pay the price to upgrade...and that 35% x $400 (or whatever) is substantially more that the cost to get it engineered...tested...and supported in the 9300…..blah…blah….blah”.....Dell of all companies will do it faster than you can blink. |
Its all speculation at this point anyway. But I admit its fun to speculate. Because someone is going to be right and then get bragging rights with a link to their post that had the correct answer.







lol




as the 6800 Ultra and you can count on that
You can count on that one.