New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sager NP5720 Review

Poll Results: So waddaya thin? Do my reviews deserve a sticky?

 
  • 66% (32)
    yes
  • 33% (16)
    no
48 Total Votes  
post #1 of 69
Thread Starter 
5720 Review by doc_simple

Hello boys and girls, here we go again! Here come the pics!!

As this is a follow up to my 5320 review I will be abbreviating anything that’s a repeat.

Packaging, same. Stuff with it, same but slightly nicer (while still not great) carrying case.

External casing: One of a couple points where I feel the 5320 comes out ahead. The 5320 had a real nice feel to the casing that this one does not. Its still pretty nice, except for the screen. Not all machines have the separation anxiety at the bottom of the screen, but it still does not have the tight feel of the 5320. Also the keyboard wrist wrest area looked more eye pleasing and sturdier. It might not be but these are my visual data.
Some pics of the outside:




Keyboard: Different feel than the 5320, not as much click noise. Like them both but different. This one also has the number pad. Nice but it takes some getting used to. Slight edge to the 5320.

check out the number pad, its a little funky to use:



Touchpad: Awesome material, incredibly sensitive, is driving me nuts. Every time I brush the damn thing I end up typing in the middle of a paragraph. Love it when using it, hate it when using external. Need updated controls from the manufacturer to adjust sensitivity or temporarily disable. But its definitely a step up from the 5320.

check out the touchpad and the power brick, cd is in there for size reference, and to make those who dont have the game feel bad :"))




Screen: Ahh, the screen. So amazingly beautiful, it really blows me away. I was somewhat unhappy with the 5320 screen. It is matte finish multi-angle viewable but not bright enough. And I did not like the matte finish. Now I am happy :’))
The best screen I have seen. Well, except maybe for the ridiculous huge mac screen I saw at Best Buy but that really does not count…..or does it?
Hakigo had some problems with his screen separating. While I dont have that issue they seem a bit cheaply connected:







But the screen looks great:






NOW WITHOUT THE SCREEN GUARD:





and of course:



Sound: Same crappy sound, same crappy speakers. Some users rave about theirs, that’s cool. I just don’t like it, will prolly get an external sound card. However, some wonderful, splendid individual did discover that by disabling IrDA in the device mangler the crickets disappear. Happy friggen day!! Apparently this works for both the 5720 and the 5320. We should all worship the ground he/she walks upon!

Wireless: Had some issues with this. Found some settings that allow you to divert more power to it and now it works real good. In Network connections right click “Wireless Network Connection” click the configure button and select the property you wish to change. I recommend “Transmit Power” and “Power Management”. These may be set by Sager, I installed my own OS and had to adjust them. Also found a great firmware for my Linksys but that’s another story…..

check out the insides:






the memory:


Heat: Not been an issue. Stays cooler than the 5320, seems to me anyway. Might be the bigger form factor because the 7800 sure as hell uses more….
maybe this is why it stays cool:


supporting evidence for the big heat sink being on your video GPU:


Power: well, batteries anyway. They don’t last long. I could probably eke more out if I turned some settings down, but I don’t want to. With the wireless and the screen cranked up, not even playing games, I got down to 30% in about an hour. Not great, but that’s not why I bought it. Once again, I don’t like screwing with battery times, so if you want more than my 1.5 hour approximation, someone else may have to pony up. Although, on second thought if someone sends me a link to a good battery life tester program I might try it out.

Addendum: the power brick even stays moderately warm after hours of Warhammer and benchtesting. Matter of fact the whole machine feels a little warmer but not uncomfortable. Almost as if this is a US Northwest model, designed to add a little heat for under the covers :0
The plug at the back does not seem as stable as the 5320, although my memory could be playing tricks on me. It works fine now but I sense the potential for a need to replace at some point.

Nitty Gritty Benchmark Dept.:
Fan Ran on high the whole time, not overly noisy. Something that could easily be remedied with a decent sound card and some bose noise-cancellation headphones, in a dark room with a comfortable chair, oh how creepy would FEAR be then ? Eh? Well not much at all. What I played, well more on that further down.

Pi Modded: run to 2 million places in 1 minute 37.922 seconds

3dMark 03: 14837

3dMark05: 6740….not as high as some I have read for this machine, but
run with some oc'd 81.85 Forceware drivers and now you get

2888 marks

did this 'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\NVIDIA Corporation\Global\NVTweak'

now you must add a DWORD Value, do this by Clicking 'Edit > New > DWORD Value'

now you must call it Coolbits, finally just right-click on the new DWORD Value and set it's 'Hexadecimal' value to 3.


on this link:

http://overclock.net/graphics-cards-...-your-gpu.html

and set the core to 47.5
mem core to 119 and it seems hotter yet we also get closer to 7000 #DMarks and maybe some AA in FEAR.
Ran HDTune: min: 1.5 MB/sec, max: 32.6, ave: 25.3 (some odd, quick spikes lowered the average some, got abot 47 ave on my home box, also SATA)
Access time: 21.7 ms, Burst Rate 67.3 MB/sec
CPU Usage: 4.5%


And, eh, oh yeah. Played some games, heh.

Warhammer 40k + Winter Assualt: Have not run fps on this yet but can state that all settings available are maxed and I get not a hiccup. No Pause, no noticeable game lag, barely any lag at all playing with 2 buds, one ten miles away on my subnet and the server being 20 miles away. Now that server sounds close but the signal has to worm through Comcast and onto the blessed, glorious Verizon optical fibre where it hits my friends beast of a server. The packets switch from cable to optical and back for each round trip. Long story short, sweet pings. The only occasional hiccup is from the wireless. Have to work on that some more. Great Game in all its blood splattered glory.

Escape From Butcher’s Bay: Some good news, some bad news. I could not play this with god-like settings on. I should say I could but I don’t want to. I gave up having to watch poor frame rates a few video cards ago and I isn’t starting again. I tool AA off and made some other real minor tweaks leaving everything else maxed and it ran smooth as a baby behind. Riddick is so the man. Again fps to come.

F.E.A.R.- also a little disappointing. Auto Detect set computer to "minimal" and graphics to a custom setting that looked mostly medium with no anti-aliasing and still not running smooth. Set computer to medium and graphics to all medium and it runs mostly good some chop. Firts setting reported 18 fps average and the second 40. Even though that avergae was 40 75% was under 25 fps, must have had some spikes when staring at the all white wall. I had hoped to see this card kick a little more booty. Admittedly, the game still looked sweet and it is a pig. I also just started playing with the OC settings on the card and for the first time I really noticed some heat being generated.
Heres all my FEAR settings:








and what do we get with those settings:


WITH 81.87 DRIVERS AND NO !$!#* SCREEN GUARD:








very nice results indeed:



thanks to Super KW for letting me know the updated drivers were out....

not to bad!


Probably some more tests to come, as I feel the need. Please send me any particular tests you might want run, where to get them from. I will only execute the ones I feel safe with, so use your own judgement.

I will have more to add as time goes by, other comments, evidence of improvements, problems not seen, ect.
Any decent requests that provide good info on what you want to know, how I might find it out for you and maybe some software to get it done will certainly be attempted.
Any recommendations for better drivers will be taken into consideration and probably be tested if I feel they are compatible and safe.

My Setup:

55720 V
Pentium M 760
Sata 80
GeForce 7800 go GTX 256 meg DDR3
17.0" Wide Viewing Angles WUXGA Active Matrix LCD Display with Super Clear Glossy Surface
1 gig Dual Channel DDR2 Infineon
the rest is pretty standard hardware for the v-series

MS XP Pro, moderately tweaked for performance. I Leave a lot of stuff others might remove because I do use the services. For testing purposes tonight I left a light load of programs in resident memory to give a more realistic score.

Forceware 81.85 with built in “Go” hardware support built-in stock from NVidia.
Nothing OC’ed. I want to keep this hardware around a bit. May feel I need OC later and will cross that bridge when I get to it.

The rest of the drivers are the stock ones from Sager. This will change soon as I finish the quest for the ultimate driver collection of the minute.

On second thought, I will probably add some pics soon too.

Hope this helps, be merciful in your condemnation if it doesn’t.

Yours In Silicon Carbon full on Addiction,

doc_simple
LL
post #2 of 69
post #3 of 69
Nice one doc! You also alleviated(sp?) some of my fears about battery life. With a little tweaking you can probably get more life out of it. And yes this needs to be stickied.
post #4 of 69
on a scale of 1 to 10 what would you rate it doc?
post #5 of 69
Thread Starter 
8.5, due to build quality and hard dirve seek times. On just POWER, its a 10. Screen, 10.

so, average 9.25
post #6 of 69
3dmark actually is mostly a test of your video card. cpu does not influence it much and it is a pretty good indicator of how your card will do in real world testing. i think the reason for your low scores is either a driver issue or just lack of optimization.
post #7 of 69
Thread Starter 
Hi Drizek,
interesting that you say that as I got completely flamed in another post for discussing how to get my 3dMark higher...
Also there is a portion of testing that specifically states CPU, usually the point at which fps drops to 1-5. I have read that the 81.85 drivers are a disappointment but I installed them anyway as they had Go support built in. Got any recommendations on a better driver? I tried another from one of the discussions but it would not install, prolly that .inf issue. I dont want to OC, well not much anyway, but if just a driver change will improve performance I am all for that.

For all you who have voted no to stickiness, whats missing? I am not looking for a flame war. Just want to know what to improve/what is missing. If you just dont like my writing style, well I guess I cant change that :')
post #8 of 69
How about some pictures?
post #9 of 69
im using optimized drivers on my desktop, dont have a laptop yet so im not sure how the whole infs thing works. anyway, i use these http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=1228

the cpu thing in 3dmark doesnt really have a huge impact on score, and i OC'd my cpu quite a bit and my scores didnt budge.

also, turning off services in windows will free up ram and improve your gaming. but if you were flamed, it was probably cause all lyou cared about was your 3dmark score. basically, if you can play all your games just fine, dont worry about it.
post #10 of 69
Thread Starter 
pictures soon. I need an afternoon to do pics and post them. Unfortunately my camera aint so great (see my 5320 review) so they are not so useful. Plus there are already plenty of external pictures available. I will focus on some screen shots and open the bottom up for a few shots.
post #11 of 69
Thread Starter 
it was because i was focused on the 3dmark scores but thats what the discussion was about, of course the end I seek is better game game performance. To which end i just found this:

'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\NVIDIA Corporation\Global\NVTweak'

now you must add a DWORD Value, do this by Clicking 'Edit > New > DWORD Value'

now you must call it Coolbits, finally just right-click on the new DWORD Value and set it's 'Hexadecimal' value to 3.


on this link:

http://overclock.net/graphics-cards-...-your-gpu.html

very cool, enables the oc tab in the drivers. I will probably play with a bit and see what results are. Just need a decent heat monitoring program next.

I have one of the hottest cards on the market and some of my games still bog out at max (sadly even less than max)

OK Im scared now. The settings for the mem clock speed were set to "2D" and were running at 600 MHz, when switch it to "3D' it jumps to 1.2 GHz!!!!!!! I ran detect optimal and it set to 447 core clock and 1.19 GHz mem clock. Whats the deal here? Was my vid card defaulted to half speed or did I just jack it up to overheat/burn out land?
post #12 of 69
Congrats on your new machine! Enjoy the power! Muhuwhahahah! YEZZ DA POWAH!!! MUHUWHAhAHA!
post #13 of 69
Great job Doc and congrats on your new beast!
post #14 of 69
GREAT JOB!!!!! .... if u could post more pictures of your 5720 and mayby some screenshots of games .... Cool review - happy to hear that u like your sager
post #15 of 69
Thread Starter 
thansk to all who like! Pics up. Its hard to take pics of games and screenshots really dont tell you what MY screen looks like. I have the plastice sheet over my screen and I dont want to take it off, but hopefully y'all can see how good it is.

and POWERFUL, AH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHa haha ha wooh, doh! :'))
post #16 of 69
Nice pictures.
post #17 of 69
Yeah I commend you Doc, most people would be too anal to even open up their new 5720-V!!!

Thanks for doing this because this sheds light on the specific heat extraction questions I have had.

The thermal design is VERY efficient but might not be for EXTREME OC'ING, of course EXTREME is relative to the platform. Some more data is needed...

You're doing the same thing as the XPS 2/M170 but in a different way. You're isolating the major heat generators to the rear of the system, you're using one massive vent and two larger (Then the XPS 2/M170) heatsinks (Not the the heat pipe, they are actually pretty comparable as far as I can see from photos, the fin surface area is what I am referring to) versus two smaller vents and two smaller heatsinks (Fins).

I will say this though, the XPS/M170 has an advantage when OC'ING because the CPU and GPU are separated far enough from each other that the simple advantage of surface area eliminates the heatsoak you get from too much heat in one location. So while the thermal design is very efficient on the 5720-V, it may not bode all that well for extreme OC'ING, however I could also be very wrong. The 5720 GPU heatsink uses two heatpipes, is this standard for the 7800 Go Ultra/GTX? I think the XPS M170 7800 Go only uses 1 heatpipe, with the addition of an extra heatpipe on the 5720-V, if I am correct about this, with the "Undervoltage" PM mod, I might be eating my own words as you could undervoltage the PM and overclock the 7800 Go and see some insane numbers not atainable on the XPS platform. Of course undervolt too much and you will actually degrade performance...

The XPS 2/M170 thermal architecture is awesome because the two hottest components are separated far enough apart so that heatsoak is eliminated. Heatsoak defined as too much heat in a given area so that the heat cannot be efficiently disapated. One of the most underlooked factors for the XPS/M170's success is this awesome thermal architecture.

Of course this is just my opinion, I have not studied the architecture so this is just what I can see from photos. Thermal compound, Heatpipe surface area, fin surface area, total fin count, vent size/architecture, fan speed and efficiency, heatshield efficiency, given properties of the CPU/GPU, gosh I could go on and on, these factors all play a role. If the 5720-V has an extra GPU heatpipe that the XPS M170 does not, all I can say is look out once undervolted and OC'd... Only time will tell but so far so good!

post #18 of 69
Thread Starter 
well, while I thank you for the compliment I didn't really "open it up". Its nothing that others who will be upgrading their RAM wont be doing. I found the heatsinks interesting in how small the processor sink is. I have had bigger on my 486!! I knew the GPU would run hotter but I guess I am used to Prescott BTU's. In the 5320 the Gpu was moved away from the processor towards the front. Really heated the wrist area. This machine really feels like it runs cooler.
post #19 of 69
Glad to hear you like it!

For curiosities sake, what does the mem/core run at while playing games? How high does the auto OC take it?

Not that I am encouraging it, but how high have you overclocked the GPU?
post #20 of 69
Thread Starter 
looks like it defaults to mem 1.1 GHz core 400MHz, no overclocking yet I dont know the nvidia setup well and I am not sure about the PM either. So stock speeds are still looking pretty nice
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Sager & Clevo Notebook Reviews