However, scarcity might also be a function of extreme demand outstripping supply. Also you might have the case where supply incorrectly targets a different market (17" wide screens) assuming that their will be more of those sold and hence better profits. Do people really want 17" widescreen laptops or is the current rage in DVD's sending off misleading signals to LCD manufacturers. After all what is the primary use of laptops? Is it for watching DVDs or for other more office related uses.
It is not the first time that manufacturers have been misled. How many of you remember OS/2? Like all evolutionary systems, some products are dead ends even though at the time they looked like a good idea. This of course could apply to 16" LCD's. Personally I prefer the 4:3 ratio and 15" is too small. Given the major laptop market is 15" portable machines 16" may be an evolutionary dead end (I hope not). Or we may get 17" in a slightly larger form factor with higher resolutions that works for both camps.
It is not the first time that manufacturers have been misled. How many of you remember OS/2? Like all evolutionary systems, some products are dead ends even though at the time they looked like a good idea. This of course could apply to 16" LCD's. Personally I prefer the 4:3 ratio and 15" is too small. Given the major laptop market is 15" portable machines 16" may be an evolutionary dead end (I hope not). Or we may get 17" in a slightly larger form factor with higher resolutions that works for both camps.








)
" I turn around and go right back to wanting the 56XX for platform familiarity and table compatibility 
(mixed feelings)