NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Forums - General › 'VISTA' Capable, Future Proof Notebook?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

'VISTA' Capable, Future Proof Notebook?

Poll Results: Will you look for vista compatability if u buy notebook today?

 
  • 40% (16)
    Sure, its must
  • 10% (4)
    i wil think about this issue
  • 22% (9)
    it,s just bothering urself for nothing
  • 15% (6)
    i don,t care
  • 12% (5)
    it,s rubbish idea
  • 0% (0)
    wat do u mean by Vista compatibilty?
  • 0% (0)
    wat is vista
40 Total Votes  
post #1 of 23
Thread Starter 
I wonder what can by my choice if i want to buy a mainstream notebook which is of cheep ,15.4 inch widescreen size, of a well known brand and upcoming VISTA compatible( hey many might be looking for the same thing, come on and share). I have made a few choices after some humble research.
FIRST- VISTA requirements (supposed!)
Any Good processor of today 1.6 Pentium M or above or similar AMD, 512 or 1000MB ram, 128MB Vram( better 250, ?64 may work)
Now, lets see my choices
1-Toshiba satellite M40--1.7GHz centrino,512 upto 2000MG RAM,60GB or more HD,64Mb VRAM (ATI X600)can be increased to 128MB( Geoforce Go6600)--$1189

2-HPdv4000 1.73 centrino,512 upto 2000MB Ram,60Gb or more HD,128MB VRAM(ATIX700)--$1224

3-Dell Inspiron 6000--1.73 centrino, 512 upto1000MB Ram,60 GB or more HD,128MB VRAM( ATI X300)--$967
(Pls check latest prices for all from their respective sites, these r prices at the time of writing.)


I excluded DELL XPS M170, reasons, it,s 17 inch, too big for laptop, and most important too expensive. I am sorry to say it,s a stupid idea to buy it just being future proof( of course not if u r just looking for a power horse and money is no matter for u).Why not i will spend half of this money for any one of above notebooks and by the time these notebooks r obsolete (say 3 years) i can use the rest of the half money to buy another mmainstream notebook at that time and may be i wil be more present-proof at that time than if i get XPS horse now!!
Another big thing i ignored 64 bit ( Athlon n Turion), yes i did, as i think it,s really does not matter. Of course 64 bit is the way of future but i can just guess by the time 64 bit system will be universal, athlon n turion processors will be already obsolete or if not, all the notebooks of today who have these processors will be old donkeys at that time as they will lack other hardware components (except processor if at all) that might be the mainstream requirement of 64 bit notebooks of that time.I hope i could clear my point.I am not anti-AMD but when u talk of a notebook, i can just say, with my little knowledge( i am not comp geek, just ordinary user), buy AMD athlon or turion for any reason( watever it may be) but not for 64-bit.Am i right?
As i mentioned it,s all my opinoin with less knowledge( newers! pls don,t rely on it). I invite geeks to discuss the topic so that we can know the facts better.U can post ur future-proof proposed systems also.But categorize it by the size(14,15,15.4widescreen,17...) please, as this is one of the main things to consider before u buy and also price( medium range, cheep or costly- it is even more important of course).
post #2 of 23
Future-proofing your PC is like future-proofing a woman after you marry her... there's no way to predict she will gain 200 lbs and try to control your every move/dollar...
post #3 of 23
Vista will still work as an OS with current laptops. It is mainly visual enhancements that need that kind of power. So do you really want to spend more for a prettier dektop?
post #4 of 23
What do you mean exactly by Vista compatibility, if you mean compatible with every single future feature that Vista and its service updates will bring, you will need DX10 compatible Video, >1GB of RAM and 64bit capable processor. But almost any computer on the market will be able to run some version of Vista at some level.
post #5 of 23
English must be your second language...
post #6 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMP_Homer
Future-proofing your PC is like future-proofing a woman after you marry her... there's no way to predict she will gain 200 lbs and try to control your every move/dollar...
Yes there is, look at her mother.

M.
post #7 of 23
HHAHAHA

THAT.. is awesome.

And true.

go milf!



and vista is going to take at least a year or 2 for software vendors to catch up with, be it with drivers or simply compatibility. Dont sweat it, and as the rule of thumb for this place goes:

buy it when you need it and get what you need then. People still run windows 2000, nt, 98se even. Why? They still do what they need them to. Keep this in mind when making your decision. Practicality is key. gl hf.
post #8 of 23
I'll wait for Vista Service Pack 48 when all the bugs are finally worked out, personally.

M.
post #9 of 23
why would you want a vista proof laptop? get linux, you wont have to worry about this crap cause it doesnt have obscene sys requirements, yet at the same time it has all the bells and whistles, and then some.
post #10 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by FearNo1
English must be your second language...
Your first must be Perl
post #11 of 23
Wow..Perl. I haven't heard about that in a while. A couple of years ago it was starting to get popular again but it seemed to die pretty quickly...

Quote:
Originally Posted by HardBall
Your first must be Perl
post #12 of 23
the d900k
post #13 of 23
Doesn't the processor have to be 64 bit to run Windows Vista?
post #14 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilSquid
Doesn't the processor have to be 64 bit to run Windows Vista?
No, there will be two versions.

M.
post #15 of 23
Yes this is one reason why I am waiting for the x1600, not just because it is faster than the x700, but because 256mb will probbaly be the minimum, or atleast more will be released with 256mb..

Vista recommends 256mb of video memory with the glass theme. With these types of recommendations I might not even upgrade at all though, cause you know if it uses that much resources just to display the theme, that it will probably screw FPS in games.
post #16 of 23
It used to be a joke, but i think it is becoming true. the sys requirements for running vista at max will be higher than half life 2. i find it somewhat pathetic that microsoft cannot add transparency and shadows to the OS without needing a 512mb 8800gtx to power it.
post #17 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by HardBall
Your first must be Perl

Don't Hate on PERL... it was my first :-)


Anyway... WIndows Vista... Lets look at Microsofts Track Record...

1) Windows (Insert 20 product names) pre-98. Meh. Relatively unstable, nothign too cool. Hey, it sounds good though.
2) Windows 2k. Relatively stable kernel. Decent OS. HEY! Lets add some Blue, and green, and a name like "Windows eXPerience"! and charge people 199$ for it! Oh, even better, lets call it 'professional' so people feel special. Wait, lets also make a 'home' version by taking out all the optimizations and features, but only charge 99$.

3) OK... so now Linux is gaining momentum... and they're OS really looks pretty with Open GL support (Enlightenment... sexy). OK so we need to make XP better. Lets... add graphics... Hm... Can't use Open GL... its Open.... OMG lets build direct X into the kernel! Yay! Awesome idea! Oh wait, lets throw in a huge 3d Clock in the corner of the screen to suck up resources!


So really.... why upgrade to vista? I havn't heard anybody tout it as 'more stable' than xp. Or 'More efficient'. Or 'Easier to use'. Or 'Anything_else_IMPORTANT'. Simply its newer, and better looking, oh yeah and it takes a 2 ghz processor and 128 megs of Vram to support the ultimate in GENIUS ideas- Direct X in the kernel.

[/rant]
post #18 of 23
Where are you from that they use commas in contractions? The apostrophe is on the next row up and three keys to the right. Spacing after punctuation also makes things easier to read. Sorry but these things are annoying if done consistently.

Now, I would definitly consider Vista when buying a new box but you should kepp in mind that the requirement that has everyone guessing is the video spec, this only applies if all the visual "eye candy" is turned on. If you don't want/can't run that stuff you can always turn it off. Good luck with your decision.
post #19 of 23
Thread Starter 

So you may not need high end graphics now

just found out this. So use Vista home basic and forget about graphics.

http://www.itp.net/news/details.php?id=19758&category=
post #20 of 23
I am running the Vista 3.1 glass theme on my e1705 and I haven't noticed even the slightest slow-down. I also play RTW at full resolution and have't noticed any slow-down at all. I also multi-task heavily (even while I'm playing a game) and still no slow-downs. If 256MB graphics were really going to be the minimum just to run transparent themes, I think I would have noticed some kind of negative effect on performance.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Notebook Forums - General
NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Forums - General › 'VISTA' Capable, Future Proof Notebook?