New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Crappy 3dMark? - Page 2

post #21 of 23

Re: underclocking

Quote:
Originally posted by Hype
It seems obvious now that the 5660 is comming underclocked compared to its speed a few weeks ago...

i hope we can find out why.. maybe the new screen has something to do with it, or maybe sager didn't want it upstaging the new 8887 ;D

lol

-Hype
I suppose it's possible that the new 5660 screen, what with the better contrast ratio and viewing angles, could generate more heat, thus they needed to offset the difference using the video-card. That's just speculation though.

Cheers.
post #22 of 23
Thread Starter 
I was under the impression that there were only new UXGA(Not completely sure). I have a SXGA+ so that might not be the case.
post #23 of 23

Frames Per Second

There is a reason why movies are at 24 fps ( DVD 25 fps mind you ) . the reason is very simple, and has been research by the first cartoonist, times where making a cartoon required drawing all 'images' by hand.

At 24 FPS, the human eye stop detecting the refresh of the whole frame, catching only the change in them. Thats is why, as soon as the movie reach 24 fps, it is 'smooth'. Try to push that limit will not work apart if the movie itself is 'Filmed/recorded' using higher frame rate VideoCameras. But you all know that, it is called 'The Bullet Time' as shown in 'The Matrix' movie. Simply a scene filmed with over 200 shots/per sec instead of the classic 24

Looking at a Quake III movie will play it only at the movie framerate
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home