New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

3D Mark 2K6 - Page 6

post #101 of 225
im not even going to try. dont want to see a sub 200 score lol.

i was going to get an xps170 with bells and whisltes...but then no coupons. decided save more money and look at a new duo come late summer...should have a better vid card by then for the xps too.
post #102 of 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by G/H
You set in the Nvidia control panel too, just go to device settings>device adjustments and there are 3-4 different options to scale the screen resolution.
Thanks for the tip!
post #103 of 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by snooz
You overclocking anything like CPU?

The GPU is overclocked to 445/1050,but everyone runs the app on overclocked GPU's anyway. Nothing else is tweaked.

-Doc
post #104 of 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc.Caliban
The GPU is overclocked to 445/1050,but everyone runs the app on overclocked GPU's anyway. Nothing else is tweaked.

-Doc
If you don't want your computer to automatically reboot on the blue screen right click on My Computer go to properties then advanced tab under the System Failure section uncheck Automatically restart.
post #105 of 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by batichavez
81.97 XTreme-G MobileForce Drivers at Stock settings (xps gen 2)

[IMG][/IMG]

post #106 of 225
Ahhhh!!!! where are all the people using 68 ultra's?

EVERYONE in this thread has either a normal 6800 or the 78...
post #107 of 225
OK guys, I reported earlier the low score of 2896. I WAS on max battery CPU setting while on power. The new score is below:

Score: 3710
SM 2.0: 1673
GT1 - 13.217
GT2 - 14.667
HDR/SM3: 1670
HDR1 - 14.463
HDR2 - 18.946
CPU: 907
CPU1 - 0.287
CPU2 - 0.458

This proves beyond any doubt that max battery was the reason for the previous low score. Make sure you run on max performance for the CPU.
post #108 of 225
post #109 of 225

I don't get it...

WHY are my scores so damn low??? I ran with everything the same as when I run 3DMark05 (Which I score 7321 on), yet I only got 2233 on 3DMark06?!?

WTF???
post #110 of 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShnikeJSB
WHY are my scores so damn low??? I ran with everything the same as when I run 3DMark05 (Which I score 7321 on), yet I only got 2233 on 3DMark06?!?

WTF???
Doesn't seem right.

Did you see this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by warrior-kid
OK guys, I reported earlier the low score of 2896. I WAS on max battery CPU setting while on power. The new score is below:

Score: 3710
SM 2.0: 1673
GT1 - 13.217
GT2 - 14.667
HDR/SM3: 1670
HDR1 - 14.463
HDR2 - 18.946
CPU: 907
CPU1 - 0.287
CPU2 - 0.458

This proves beyond any doubt that max battery was the reason for the previous low score. Make sure you run on max performance for the CPU.
post #111 of 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by totalmeltdown
Doesn't seem right.

Did you see this?
Yeah, I read that, and I WAS running on Max Performance. It definitely isn't right, and it is a 3DMark06 thing, as I still run games really high/fast and I STILL get 7300+ in 3DMark05.

Something is fishy...
post #112 of 225
i got 3404 score...
post #113 of 225
got 2451 on my 6800U..
seems there isn't much of a difference between the vanilla and the Ultra
post #114 of 225

See?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fidget
i got 3404 score...
Basically the same config as me, yet I got over 1000 marks lower... Anyone have any idea on this?
post #115 of 225
'06 is so f'ed... they should have just stuck with 1024x768 for everyone, now everyone's 9300s with WXGAs will be outscoring M170s with WUXGA... not to mention 9300 WXGA versus 9300 WUXGA... on with the next version, FutureMark.
post #116 of 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by somethingsin
Ahhhh!!!! where are all the people using 68 ultra's?

EVERYONE in this thread has either a normal 6800 or the 78...
I got an Ultra. I got 2588 on high perf. & 475c1200.
post #117 of 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blahman
'06 is so f'ed... they should have just stuck with 1024x768 for everyone, now everyone's 9300s with WXGAs will be outscoring M170s with WUXGA... not to mention 9300 WXGA versus 9300 WUXGA... on with the next version, FutureMark.
I agree
post #118 of 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by go5700
I think ppl should also list what resolution they run the test to make the results comparable because the 3dmark06 runs @1280x1024 by default. For the system who does not have that resolution (WXGA, WXGA+), the test will fall back to a slightly lower resolution and the result will turn out to be slight inflated.

http://www.notebookforums.com/forums...5&postcount=13
and

Quote:
Originally Posted by 911medic
I think most people have their screen type in their sig. It's safe to assume people are running at default settings, so you can safely assume that those with WXGA+ screens are running at 1280x854. We can't help it if that's the way the program runs.
I never did understand this. It may be a silly question, but why can't the 3DMark folks create a score that is relative to the screen resolution. They can make all these fancy tests and make it all look good, but they can't make a consistent scoring scheme? They should at least provide the option of creating a weighted score. It would make the whole 3DMark thing so much more usable and universal.

I guess after years of beating on 3D hardware they should now a little bit about the relation between resolution and performance. And they should know and take into account that not everyone is capable of running at 1280x1024 natively.

But then again, I may be completely wrong and make a fool out of myself
post #119 of 225

OK, this is odd...

I just noticed this, despite being plugged into the A/C...

Could this be the problem? Now why the hell is it doing THAT???

post #120 of 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShnikeJSB
I just noticed this, despite being plugged into the A/C...

Could this be the problem? Now why the hell is it doing THAT???
Weird man. But then, why would you get a normal 3DMark05 score? Try running 3DMark05 again in case this just started happening.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home