New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

3D Mark 2K6 - Page 11

post #201 of 225
1/31/06 at 9:57pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahimsa
Main Test Results
3DMark Score4120 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score1712 Marks
SM 3.0 Score2166 Marks
CPU Score891 Marks

Was running with antivirus/spyware in background. im stoked because yesterday my system only hit 2700 or so as the cpu was bottlenecked for some reason. nice improvement. will also try running on higher rez.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=95339

XPS Gen2 2.13 450/1200
Glad to hear you got it worked out.

Wait a sec... something's not right here...

...... there it is!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Futuremark for Ahimsa
Benchmark Settings

Resolution 1024x768
Could people please post their resolutions right next to their 3dmark06 scores from now on.

I know what your thinking Simply
Reply
Reply
post #202 of 225
1/31/06 at 11:06pm
yeah tanamoril, you prob posted just before i posted my next (corrected) results of 1280x1024 (right above your post) so no worries.

anyway, did it again at 460/1250 and it locked up, so set it back to 445/1250 and it went through without any artifacts and scored 3785 at 1280x1024 ( http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=95517 ), which im happy with. also, its running really cool as well. did a 2 hour cycle and max temp was 61 cpu/79 gpu which is way cooler than my 6800 ultra was.

with world of warcraft on full max settings for 4 hours gametime it only hit 66 (edit: 66 gpu)--im stoked because it used to cook my 6800.

xps gen2 2.13 445/1250 7800gtx
Reply
Reply
post #203 of 225
2/1/06 at 3:19am

Absolutely

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanamoril
Could people please post their resolutions right next to their 3dmark06 scores from now on.
CAN'T AGREE MORE
A 3DMARK SCORE IS MEANINGLESS WITHOUT RESOLUTION AND AA&AF SETTINGS
IMHO TWO RESOLUTION SETTINGS DESERVE TO BE TESTED:
THE DEFAULT SETTINGS (1280X1024) AND THE NATIVE RESOLUTION OF YOUR LAPTOP (1920X1200 IN MY CASE).
Reply
Reply
post #204 of 225
2/1/06 at 3:25pm
3734 3DMarks 06
Stock 3D Mark Settings (1280 X 1024, no AA)
7800Go GTX OC to 440/1250 no artifacts

Edit> Forgot - XTreme-G MobileForce 83.20-v2.25
Reply
Reply
post #205 of 225
2/4/06 at 1:33am
Quote:
Originally Posted by timmy223
2849 3dmarks EDIT: 1920 x 1200 res
how did you modify your rez? did you buy the full version?
Reply
Reply
post #206 of 225
2/4/06 at 1:40am
o...no i thought he ment desktop res
Reply
Reply
post #207 of 225
2/8/06 at 11:46pm
Reply
Reply
post #208 of 225
2/9/06 at 12:33am
2252 (1280x1024)

higher clocks than sig.
Reply
Reply
post #209 of 225
2/10/06 at 4:04am
Quote:
Originally Posted by basso4735
2252 (1280x1024)

higher clocks than sig.
, nice..
Reply
Reply
post #210 of 225
2/10/06 at 4:28am
Reply
Reply
post #211 of 225
2/11/06 at 1:56pm
4206 @ 1024x768 with specs in sig! woot finaly over 4k!
Reply
Reply
post #212 of 225
2/11/06 at 2:02pm
Would you be able to post some in-game screenshots please?
Reply
Reply
post #213 of 225
2/11/06 at 2:46pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by srtjustin
4206 @ 1024x768 with specs in sig! woot finaly over 4k!
Over 4K at that res for a 7800 isn't impressive.
Reply
Reply
post #214 of 225
2/11/06 at 3:48pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by totalmeltdown
Over 4K at that res for a 7800 isn't impressive.
In 06 version? It's double my 6800 overclocked score!
Reply
Reply
post #215 of 225
2/11/06 at 5:04pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by totalmeltdown
Over 4K at that res for a 7800 isn't impressive.
I think he meant 1280x854
Reply
Reply
post #216 of 225
2/22/06 at 4:03pm
Does my 3DMark06 score seem right? I don't know what any of these scores mean.

3DMark Score: 3868
S2.0 Score: 1719
HDR/SM3.0 Score: 1738
CPU Score: 970

I'm using the limited version of 3DMark06 with a 7800gtx and 1.7 @ 2.26 cpu.
Reply
Reply
post #217 of 225
2/22/06 at 5:06pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaIsRobust
Does my 3DMark06 score seem right? I don't know what any of these scores mean.

3DMark Score: 3868
S2.0 Score: 1719
HDR/SM3.0 Score: 1738
CPU Score: 970

I'm using the limited version of 3DMark06 with a 7800gtx and 1.7 @ 2.26 cpu.
Seems right on the money, maybe even a little high . What clocks were you running on that card? Make sure you update your sig with your new parts .
Reply
Reply
post #218 of 225
2/22/06 at 5:14pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. K6
Seems right on the money, maybe even a little high . What clocks were you running on that card? Make sure you update your sig with your new parts .
Everything is in my sig, it just may be a little hard to read right now.
Reply
Reply
post #219 of 225
2/24/06 at 4:41am
i got 1947 i thought that was low.. is it for my system?
Reply
Reply
post #220 of 225
2/24/06 at 8:05pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by troncarter123
i got 1947 i thought that was low.. is it for my system?
Your overclocks are way too low, the safest and almost guaranteed stable clock is 370/770
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home