New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

3D Mark 2K6 - Page 4

post #61 of 225
1/19/06 at 12:27am
3735 for me.
Reply
Reply
post #62 of 225
1/19/06 at 12:28am
3645 here
Reply
Reply
post #63 of 225
1/19/06 at 12:34am
That cpu test was pretty insane.
Reply
Reply
post #64 of 225
1/19/06 at 12:39am
Updated drivers work wonders...haha. I got at 2156 with the Tweaks R Us 81.97-v2.25 Mobile Drivers. I am running the card at 373/785. The CPU tests are really insane. And the rest of the tests are pretty much the same. It seems that all they really did was up the default resolution. Other than that, it is pretty cool.
Reply
Reply
post #65 of 225
1/19/06 at 12:40am
it took a long ass time on my computer. my cpu score was like 800 something.
Reply
Reply
post #66 of 225
1/19/06 at 12:41am
I got 903 on mine.
Reply
Reply
post #67 of 225
1/19/06 at 12:42am
Scores
LL
Reply
Reply
post #68 of 225
1/19/06 at 12:43am
Look at the water dragon thinger in the airship one, definitely looks different. Almost looks like it's got some skin transparency / subcutaneous diffraction going on. And the Antarctic research camp or whatever was absolutely beautiful. Very cinematic looking, could almost pass for photography. Anyone got any 1920x1200's of that test for backgrounds?
Reply
Reply
post #69 of 225
1/19/06 at 12:46am
So...

Since my PC won't run it silky smooth I need a new video card, right?
Reply
Reply
post #70 of 225
1/19/06 at 2:00am
something from NASA
Reply
Reply
post #71 of 225
1/19/06 at 2:23am
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigfootsMonk
something from NASA
I deleted my other post asking what could get this score...


Maybe Vista on the new Dell MacBook


Yeah it's a joke.....lighten up.
Reply
Reply
post #72 of 225
1/19/06 at 2:33am
Well, here's mine:
Quote:
3DMark Score 3451 3DMarks

SM 2.0 Score 1619 Marks

SM 3.0 Score 1648 Marks

CPU Score 735 Marks
This with my 7800 @ 400/1.06. And I forgot to change my driver settings, so this is with them set to "Quality."
Reply
Reply
post #73 of 225
1/19/06 at 3:06am
3927 with 81.98's @ 470/1300. Could probably break 4000 at 485 on the core, but meh. I realllllly don't feel like going through those CPU tests again. Each time it does one I can feel the lifespan of the CPU being cut short by a few months
Reply
Reply
post #74 of 225
1/19/06 at 4:10am
wow, just tried runing it on my desktop. Came up with an error saying i was out of video memory. Yikes, is a 256mb card required?
Reply
Reply
post #75 of 225
1/19/06 at 4:16am
I'm using the Forceware 81.98 and Vid card on stock but what i don't get is on my project details it says the core clock is 12mhz. Did that affect my score?
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/pr...rojectId=12048


Reply
Reply
post #76 of 225
1/19/06 at 5:19am
I got it up to 1842. Cause my card is not capable of sm3 so I get 0 points for it. It's not fair!!!!!!!
If I had sm3 I would be doing 2300+
sm2 score 976
sm3 score N/A
cpu score 766
Reply
Reply
post #77 of 225
1/19/06 at 7:10am
im using the 81.97 XTreme-G MobileForce Drivers OC'd to 380/780

Reply
Reply
post #78 of 225
1/19/06 at 7:52am
I think ppl should also list what resolution they run the test to make the results comparable because the 3dmark06 runs @1280x1024 by default. For the system who does not have that resolution (WXGA, WXGA+), the test will fall back to a slightly lower resolution and the result will turn out to be slight inflated.

http://www.notebookforums.com/forums...5&postcount=13
Reply
Reply
post #79 of 225
1/19/06 at 9:49am
I think most people have their screen type in their sig. It's safe to assume people are running at default settings, so you can safely assume that those with WXGA+ screens are running at 1280x854. We can't help it if that's the way the program runs.
Reply
Reply
post #80 of 225
1/19/06 at 11:12am
Bah to all these peoples with XGA screens.. They get the cheat a bit because it loweres the res :P

I'm running the real 1280x1024 @ 380/798 and get 2100
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home