NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Forums - General › ***The Official NBF ORB/Benchmark Team***
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

***The Official NBF ORB/Benchmark Team*** - Page 8

post #141 of 488
1/27/06 at 5:02am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultimate33
I don't even have the computer yet so yea
Well there are a lot of stock cards that come overclocked, so you would need your core clock and mem clock for anyone to be able to tell you what you might score (my stock clocks are 490/1.3). You will be able to do very good with that setup.
Reply
Reply
post #142 of 488
1/27/06 at 6:53am
Thread Starter 
nice OC MartianRed, scores are updated
Reply
Reply
post #143 of 488
1/27/06 at 2:34pm
little better.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=80597
Reply
Reply
post #144 of 488
1/27/06 at 3:46pm
Thread Starter 
GJ bassok, you are now #2 in your class
Reply
Reply
post #145 of 488
1/27/06 at 4:14pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yang88She
GJ bassok, you are now #2 in your class
i wont be able to pass chrysaor because he has the advantage of the wxga.
Reply
Reply
post #146 of 488
1/27/06 at 4:31pm
fine fine. i win

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=81076
Reply
Reply
post #147 of 488
1/27/06 at 6:17pm
Thread Starter 
nice Basso, Basso is now #1 in the 6800 go class
Reply
Reply
post #148 of 488
1/28/06 at 12:26am

Newest score for me Desktop!!

Just increased my score some more...



http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=82467

Enjoy!!
Reply
Reply
post #149 of 488
1/28/06 at 9:00am
Thread Starter 
scores updated
Reply
Reply
post #150 of 488
1/29/06 at 12:28am
This is way too much, great stuff.............
Reply
Reply
post #151 of 488
1/29/06 at 2:52am
Hi everyone! I just got my camera back and I decided to take some pics of my desktop so you could all see it. I know it could be a bit cleaner. However, I think it looks pretty good.









I hope you like it!

--K1tty
Reply
Reply
post #152 of 488
1/29/06 at 3:14am

Anyone gets better 06 score with a P-M2.0?

3dmark06 4121 @1280x1024 w/P-M2.0GHz

7800 GTX Go @505c1330 default voltage

3dmark06
4121 (2025 1952 836) 1280x1024
3334 (1557 1421 838) 1920x1200

3dmark05
7958 1024x768
5627 1920x1200
Reply
Reply
post #153 of 488
1/29/06 at 4:46am
Score: 4160

Setup is same as sig...
Model: Inspiron 9300
Type: Laptop
GPU: 7800GTX (bios flashed to 450/1200)


Futuremark link
Reply
Reply
post #154 of 488
1/29/06 at 4:58am
Thread Starter 
scores added, and kitty you need to add pictures of yourself, and wire management is your friend, very nice setup indeed
Reply
Reply
post #155 of 488
1/29/06 at 10:25am

5720-V - 1280x1024 = 4178 | 1024x768 = 4861

@ YANG,

I think the laptop scoring is becoming inaccurate, there are some scores that are posted which were clearly run in a resolution of 1024x768.

My question is can you break the laptop scores down into (2) columns, and (2) columns only? If you have more than (2) columns you will be making change requests forever, so I would simply break it down like this IMO.

EXAMPLE:

LAPTOPS - 1280x1024 (Default 06')

1. Codename_47 - 5720: 4178

LAPTOPS - 1024x768 (Default Legacy or Default 05')

1. Codename_47 - 5720: 4861

IMHO, I would either use both methods like above or simply force everyone to use 1280x1024 to keep scores uniformly valid and keep your matrix valid.

The scoring ranges from 1024x768 to 1280x1024 are exponential so we must be careful or scoring data may become convoluted and inaccurate. Also as you have already done, I would make it mandatory that all scores have screen captures showing score and resolution.

Just my 2 cents.

Here are my scores:

1280x1024 - 4178:



1024x768 - 4861:



Please stay tuned for a full write-up on my benchmarking of the 5720 using 3D06' coming shortly...
Reply
Reply
post #156 of 488
1/29/06 at 12:06pm
What about for 9300 users... 1280x854
Reply
Reply
post #157 of 488
1/29/06 at 2:48pm
Thread Starter 
oh wow, I didn't even realize they changed the defaults on the 06 (probably b/c I havn't had a chance to mess w/ it myself since I do not have a capable machine yet...it's still in "build" =)

I'll fix the directions and requirements later today, I will add your highest scores Code, thanks for the contribution...

That's why I requested a SS, and futuremark link in order for members to compare their scores w/ other makes and models
Reply
Reply
post #158 of 488
1/29/06 at 3:25pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yang88She
oh wow, I didn't even realize they changed the defaults on the 06 (probably b/c I havn't had a chance to mess w/ it myself since I do not have a capable machine yet...it's still in "build" =)

I'll fix the directions and requirements later today, I will add your highest scores Code, thanks for the contribution...

That's why I requested a SS, and futuremark link in order for members to compare their scores w/ other makes and models
I kind of figured you probably just have'nt had the time to play with it.

IMO, I think they changed the default res because of the growing usage of SLi.

The 2D test is absolutely brutal and will bump your score up tremendously with a dual core CPU.

My scores are literally nearly all GPU, the current P-M's choke on the 2D test.

Waiting for a dual core P-M Dual 7800 Go GTX's - Mobile SLi
Reply
Reply
post #159 of 488
1/29/06 at 3:35pm
@YANG

Just a suggestion, you may want to retally the laptop scores for accuracy as previously mentioned.

Kitty is in the 4500 range and I am 99.5% that this score comes from a 1024x768 run. I could be wrong, but I am almost positive it does...

@2.46 GHz and 490c/1270m I could not break 4178 @ 1280x1024 so I seriously doubt a 4500ish 1280x1024 score is possible right now on the 5720. So circumstances like this are going to throw the "Truth" in numbers off.

So if I submitted my score of 4861 to you and did not inform you otherwise of my resolution, I would erroniously hold the top spot. This is all I am saying, retallying the benches will be more beneficial to all and will tell the truth of the data.

By the way and either way, AWESOME SCORE K!TTY

Thanks YANG and awesome job you're doing with all of this
Reply
Reply
post #160 of 488
1/30/06 at 12:04am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codename_47
@YANG

Just a suggestion, you may want to retally the laptop scores for accuracy as previously mentioned.

Kitty is in the 4500 range and I am 99.5% that this score comes from a 1024x768 run. I could be wrong, but I am almost positive it does...

@2.46 GHz and 490c/1270m I could not break 4178 @ 1280x1024 so I seriously doubt a 4500ish 1280x1024 score is possible right now on the 5720. So circumstances like this are going to throw the "Truth" in numbers off.

So if I submitted my score of 4861 to you and did not inform you otherwise of my resolution, I would erroniously hold the top spot. This is all I am saying, retallying the benches will be more beneficial to all and will tell the truth of the data.

By the way and either way, AWESOME SCORE K!TTY

Thanks YANG and awesome job you're doing with all of this
I would think that was the reason Yang asked for the ORB link as well as a screen shot (to verify test conditions). I didn't even know you could change the res, unless your monitor didn't support 1280 x 1024 (at least in the free version). And yes I did the run at default res. Very interesting topic though, if that is indeed what some have done to get a higher score (I never even thought about that).
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Notebook Forums - General
NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Forums - General › ***The Official NBF ORB/Benchmark Team***