NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Forums - General › ***The Official NBF ORB/Benchmark Team***
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

***The Official NBF ORB/Benchmark Team*** - Page 4

post #61 of 488
1/23/06 at 2:07pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarthBeavis
keep in mind us lappy users cannot oc our cpu (at least us Clevo 900k owners)
wth, we can't?
Reply
Reply
post #62 of 488
1/23/06 at 2:23pm
posting again to help roboto, and to include the link for detailed system specs, I'll overclock the gpu a little in the next test...

Linkage: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=63247

Reply
Reply
post #63 of 488
1/23/06 at 2:41pm

a new day , and a new score

I tweaked my computer a bit. I upped the clock speed back to what I had it at as well as the cards. Apparently anything over a certain amount (as for vga core clock) 3Dmark06 cannot recognize. So it just makes up something.
Here are my newest results.



Please update whenever you can
I probably wont try to squeeze any more out of this thing lol

--K1tty
Reply
Reply
post #64 of 488
1/23/06 at 2:45pm
Thread Starter 
very nice score!!
Reply
Reply
post #65 of 488
1/23/06 at 3:24pm
Well, to allow you folks with the 7800 video cards to laugh at us folks with more mobile computers , here's my score on my Asus Z71v with a 6600 go vid card, 1.86 Ghz Pentium M, & 2 gigs RAM
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/pr...rojectId=63550
Reply
Reply
post #66 of 488
1/23/06 at 3:42pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djembe
Well, to allow you folks with the 7800 video cards to laugh at us folks with more mobile computers , here's my score on my Asus Z71v with a 6600 go vid card, 1.86 Ghz Pentium M, & 2 gigs RAM
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/pr...rojectId=63550

thanks for the contribution!!

@ least your #1 in your class
Reply
Reply
post #67 of 488
1/23/06 at 5:41pm
Overclocked somewhat

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/pr...rojectId=64334
Reply
Reply
post #68 of 488
1/23/06 at 5:44pm
Me Desktop System:

6600GT 128, AMD 3500+ 2GB RAM

3DMark: 1650
HDR/SM3.0: 620
CPU: 832



http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=64155

Haven't got 3DMArk running in SLI yet, that keeps crashing. Will post score as soon as it works!
Reply
Reply
post #69 of 488
1/23/06 at 5:54pm
Thread Starter 
scores have been added...thanks!!

and nice OC Dj
Reply
Reply
post #70 of 488
1/23/06 at 6:46pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by a1i3nw4r3
I tweaked my computer a bit. I upped the clock speed back to what I had it at as well as the cards. Apparently anything over a certain amount (as for vga core clock) 3Dmark06 cannot recognize. So it just makes up something.
Here are my newest results.



Please update whenever you can
I probably wont try to squeeze any more out of this thing lol

--K1tty

Dam. Nice score there. Can you please post your orb so we can see all the stats.
Reply
Reply
post #71 of 488
1/23/06 at 7:06pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by plageclochard
posting again to help roboto, and to include the link for detailed system specs, I'll overclock the gpu a little in the next test...

Linkage: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=63247
hey thanks plage. Obviosly, something is wrong on my end. I think ill swap cards with my friend. He has a 6800 vanilla. He gets 1200 on 06,and spec for spec, my system is better, sans the video card. So, if i get 1200+ with his card, then ill be lead to believe there is something wrong with my card.
Reply
Reply
post #72 of 488
1/23/06 at 7:07pm
Damn. Somebody just nudged me out of the orb's top spot for a P4. OC'd their 670 to 5GHz.
Reply
Reply
post #73 of 488
1/23/06 at 7:12pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr. roboto
something is wrong on my end
Roboto, I noticed that you had HT disabled. I think HT will actually help you on this bench. I noticed some 3.4GHz P4's had higher CPU scores than your 3.5, and that may be why.
Reply
Reply
post #74 of 488
1/23/06 at 8:18pm
I finally got my 6600GT's to run in SLI mode *and* 3DMark06 to *not* crash.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=65169

3DMark: 2753
HDR:SM3.0: 1140
CPU: 834

Reply
Reply
post #75 of 488
1/23/06 at 8:31pm
Thread Starter 
added to the SLI members
Reply
Reply
post #76 of 488
1/23/06 at 8:40pm
well my original score 2619 and i ran it again to get my score again and increased it to 2625.
the rest of my stats are on my sig. cost me only $850, but after new power supply and gpu $1150, always an on going process.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=64903

Reply
Reply
post #77 of 488
1/23/06 at 8:45pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yang88She
added to the SLI members
Thanks

Really appreciate all the work you're putting in this!
Reply
Reply
post #78 of 488
1/23/06 at 9:18pm
Thread Starter 
will do, all score added and adjusted...now mitchel get the 9400 up n running so we can add some 7800GO scores =P
Reply
Reply
post #79 of 488
1/23/06 at 10:03pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by dellbert
Roboto, I noticed that you had HT disabled. I think HT will actually help you on this bench. I noticed some 3.4GHz P4's had higher CPU scores than your 3.5, and that may be why.
yeah, i dont know why 3dmark says that, but my cpu doesnt support HT. Its one of the earlier prescotts with a 533 fsb, unfortunatley.
Reply
Reply
post #80 of 488
1/24/06 at 1:36am
I have no idea what I'm doing, but I got a pretty decent score by shutting off just about every damn XP service that I could: 4349.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=66173
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Notebook Forums - General
NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Forums - General › ***The Official NBF ORB/Benchmark Team***