NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Sager & Clevo Notebook Forums › Sager & Clevo Notebooks › 100G Hitachi 5400 SATA vs 7200 SATA
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

100G Hitachi 5400 SATA vs 7200 SATA

post #1 of 11
Thread Starter 
got a new 5720-C with the 100G 5400 SATA (HTS541010G9SA00), aka "Hitachi Travelstar 5K100".

Does anyone know of any direct comparison with the 7200 SATA version? Not which one should load software faster, but what is the real difference in time saved? (seconds shaved off by going 100G 7200 SATA)...

I chose the 100G 5400 SATA to save a few dollars and get a bigger drive but now I cant help but wonder if I made the wrong decision - this is really buggin me. Now I wonder how much faster time (albeit in seconds) will Windows load with a 7200 SATA vs 5400 SATA?

The Hitachi specs are below but I would like to know if anyone has real-world performance info comparing the two Sager drives (i.e. installing Windows, Windows startup, loading a game/map, loading any adobe program, or any large software, transferring a large number of really big files, transferring a large number of really small files..) or anything .. anything other than theoretical numbers/stats/aerial density claims -- looking for some real-world usage examples.


Travelstar 5400 --> http://www.hitachigst.com/portal/sit...703e3aac4f0a0/

Travelstar 7200 --> http://www.hitachigst.com/portal/sit...824a0eac4f0a0/


notice how Hitachi boasts that both the 5400 SATA and 7200 SATA use similar low power circuits and the difference in power consumption for both is neglegible - so now I'm really kicking myself. c'mon guys I can't be the only one thinking it -- i'm sure potential buyers are thinking the same thing ..is the small increase in rotational speed really worth it? If you bought 5400 would you buy it again?

sidenote:
@Luke : will the 30-day guarantee allow me to return this machine, pay the difference, and change drives? is that possible? ..just asking
post #2 of 11
I went with the 120 GB 5400 rpm SATA hard dirve. In my previous machine (a HP ZD7000) I had purchased it with a 5400 60 GB hard drive. Not long after I bought that machine I upgraded to a 7200 rpm 60 GB drive. It did seem faster for boot up and game load times. In regards to my 5720 I was wondering like you if I would be kicking myself in the butt for not going with the 7200 rpm. Well it is plenty fast for loading games and bootup. I think you will be happy with the 5400 rpm 100 GB drive you have chosen.
post #3 of 11
the diff in read times is enormous. My 5400 SATA clocked in at about 30MBps. Extremely sad, and hopefully not representative. I am gonna start a new thread to see if people will test their drives to see if we have a winner.
post #4 of 11
Thread Starter 
will the 30-day guarantee allow me to return this machine, pay the difference, and change drives?
post #5 of 11
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krassh
In regards to my 5720 I was wondering like you if I would be kicking myself in the butt for not going with the 7200 rpm. Well it is plenty fast for loading games and bootup. I think you will be happy with the 5400 rpm 100 GB drive you have chosen.
you're right and I agree, this is a sweet machine, but now i am wondering how much faster it would be with a 7200 ..
if the difference in speed is slightly above insignificant then its no bother, but if it would actually cut 5, 10, or 15 seconds off of windows/game load times then ...
post #6 of 11
The harddrive is the biggest bottleneck in modern computers. So when you get the slower drives the performance hit is very noticable.
post #7 of 11
More significant than straight rpm comparison is the model of the actual drive itself. There's a recent review of notebook drives somewhere (might have been on Tom's Hardware) where it was clear that the rpm was an insufficient measure. There were 7200 rpm drives performing worse than 5400's. The top drive was a 7200 tho. I think the best two were the 7200 and 5400 Seagates. Someone might have the link handy; I'm dozing...

I'm waiting a little longer... there's a 160Gb drive just out... need that matched with a Core Duo and a 7800gtx.... and no headphone hiss please!
post #8 of 11
post #9 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by robax
More significant than straight rpm comparison is the model of the actual drive itself. There's a recent review of notebook drives somewhere (might have been on Tom's Hardware) where it was clear that the rpm was an insufficient measure. There were 7200 rpm drives performing worse than 5400's. The top drive was a 7200 tho. I think the best two were the 7200 and 5400 Seagates. Someone might have the link handy; I'm dozing...
One more link:

http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/11/...t_and_furious/

Regards

Gintas
post #10 of 11
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Telsakoma
Sager is going to send me a new 7200rpm SATA 100GB. All I had to do was supply a CC# for the new drive, and send the 5400rpm back when it arrives, and then they will refund the difference. I opted to pay for express. Great customer service Sager. Fingers crossed.

And then I read this below (thanks Telsakoma) so I'm really happy now that I switched drives within the 30-day window

Tomshardware:

"...With raw transfer rates of up to 54 MB/s, the TravelStar 7K100 is the fastest 2.5" hard drive we've seen yet. When taking a look at the average data transfer speed it is still able to maintain 40 MB/s. (We found it a bit surprising to see that Seagate's new drive isn't able to keep up with these numbers at all.)..."
post #11 of 11
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by KlaasH

Storagereview Conclusion:

"...Those in the market for an upgraded notebook hard drive seek more capacity and/or speed. At a rather steep price ($230 at the time of this writing), Hitachi's Travelstar 7K100 offers gobs of both. Though it overall remains a far cry from that of the typical desktop unit, the 7K100 nonetheless delivers the best performance around when it comes both to office/productivity applications and games. Newcomer Seagate's Momentus 7200.1 also deserves an honorable mention. The Momentus for the most part keeps up the pace while offering a slightly lower noise floor. Interestingly, one sacrifices neither quiet nor cool operation when choosing a 7200 RPM device over a 5400 RPM one..."

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Sager & Clevo Notebooks
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Sager & Clevo Notebook Forums › Sager & Clevo Notebooks › 100G Hitachi 5400 SATA vs 7200 SATA