got a new 5720-C with the 100G 5400 SATA (HTS541010G9SA00), aka "Hitachi Travelstar 5K100".
Does anyone know of any direct comparison with the 7200 SATA version? Not which one should load software faster, but what is the real difference in time saved? (seconds shaved off by going 100G 7200 SATA)...
I chose the 100G 5400 SATA to save a few dollars and get a bigger drive but now I cant help but wonder if I made the wrong decision - this is really buggin me. Now I wonder how much faster time (albeit in seconds) will Windows load with a 7200 SATA vs 5400 SATA?
The Hitachi specs are below but I would like to know if anyone has real-world performance info comparing the two Sager drives (i.e. installing Windows, Windows startup, loading a game/map, loading any adobe program, or any large software, transferring a large number of really big files, transferring a large number of really small files..) or anything .. anything other than theoretical numbers/stats/aerial density claims -- looking for some real-world usage examples.
Travelstar 5400 --> http://www.hitachigst.com/portal/sit...703e3aac4f0a0/
Travelstar 7200 --> http://www.hitachigst.com/portal/sit...824a0eac4f0a0/
notice how Hitachi boasts that both the 5400 SATA and 7200 SATA use similar low power circuits and the difference in power consumption for both is neglegible - so now I'm really kicking myself. c'mon guys I can't be the only one thinking it -- i'm sure potential buyers are thinking the same thing ..is the small increase in rotational speed really worth it? If you bought 5400 would you buy it again?
sidenote:
@Luke : will the 30-day guarantee allow me to return this machine, pay the difference, and change drives? is that possible? ..just asking
Does anyone know of any direct comparison with the 7200 SATA version? Not which one should load software faster, but what is the real difference in time saved? (seconds shaved off by going 100G 7200 SATA)...
I chose the 100G 5400 SATA to save a few dollars and get a bigger drive but now I cant help but wonder if I made the wrong decision - this is really buggin me. Now I wonder how much faster time (albeit in seconds) will Windows load with a 7200 SATA vs 5400 SATA?
The Hitachi specs are below but I would like to know if anyone has real-world performance info comparing the two Sager drives (i.e. installing Windows, Windows startup, loading a game/map, loading any adobe program, or any large software, transferring a large number of really big files, transferring a large number of really small files..) or anything .. anything other than theoretical numbers/stats/aerial density claims -- looking for some real-world usage examples.
Travelstar 5400 --> http://www.hitachigst.com/portal/sit...703e3aac4f0a0/
Travelstar 7200 --> http://www.hitachigst.com/portal/sit...824a0eac4f0a0/
notice how Hitachi boasts that both the 5400 SATA and 7200 SATA use similar low power circuits and the difference in power consumption for both is neglegible - so now I'm really kicking myself. c'mon guys I can't be the only one thinking it -- i'm sure potential buyers are thinking the same thing ..is the small increase in rotational speed really worth it? If you bought 5400 would you buy it again?
sidenote:
@Luke : will the 30-day guarantee allow me to return this machine, pay the difference, and change drives? is that possible? ..just asking






will the 30-day guarantee allow me to return this machine, pay the difference, and change drives?
...

When taking a look at the average data transfer speed it is still able to maintain 40 MB/s. (We found it a bit surprising to see that Seagate's new drive isn't able to keep up with these numbers at all.)..."