NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Acer Forums › Acer Notebooks › Acer Travelmate 8204wlmi review on cnet.com
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Acer Travelmate 8204wlmi review on cnet.com - Page 2

post #21 of 35
I just read on another forum that the camera uses USB (2.0, I'm assuming). If that's the case, then that could explain what could be causing the USB bug. So, if any enterprising soul out there wants to run two battery benchmarks, with the camera enabled and disabled, that might be of some value...
post #22 of 35
How would the camera be using USB.? I thought it was built in... unless they're running like a USB connection down the lid of the LCD?
post #23 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck232
How would the camera be using USB.? I thought it was built in... unless they're running like a USB connection down the lid of the LCD?
There is a connection for the Camera to something inthe case, not all USB connections have to be physicaly hardwired and avalible on the outside of the case, most likely the internal wiring leads to a USB controller, actualy that makes a lot of sense because most web cams are USB devices.
post #24 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rastlin
There is a connection for the Camera to something inthe case, not all USB connections have to be physicaly hardwired and avalible on the outside of the case, most likely the internal wiring leads to a USB controller, actualy that makes a lot of sense because most web cams are USB devices.
Yup, that's how it typically is. Besides, since earlier Travelmate versions (like 800 series, I believe) builtin Bluetooth is also on USB. It sure is in TM810x.
Sandra or Everest should tell you what's on your USB.
post #25 of 35
Yeah, that review is bunk. And they keep comparing it to the Acer Ferrari, but not one mention that it's the next model up from the 8100 series, or anything about the 8104 at all.

As for their reporting errors about it (3.1 megapixel webcam!?), remember back when they were talking about the top something # of notebooks, and they said that the 8100 was 8lbs? Hah! Idiots. No wonder they classified it as a desktop replacement.

This notebook looks great. If I didn't already have the ever awesome 8104, I'd strongly consider getting one of these puppies (once the price dropped below $2k).

-Ransom
post #26 of 35
It's the number one rated laptop at CNET UK with 9.2. Should make you guys a bit more happy.
post #27 of 35
Check out from that reveiw one above (the CNET UK reveiw):

We don't like:

Tacky-looking carbon-fibre lid


Ummm....
post #28 of 35
Lol you guys actually pay attention to these stupid Cnet review's about computers? This is what this forum is about, the collection of information here on notebookforums is 200 times more then what cnet can offer.
post #29 of 35
Does anyone know how the Bluetooth phone will work with Vonage? Do I need to upgrade to the computer version of Vonage, i.e. the software download that allows you to make calls from your laptop connected to a high speed network.

Thanks
post #30 of 35
I couldn't agree more! Every time I see one of those reviews and they are all excited about something, and they act as if it's the first notebook ever to have it (ie: "this thing has a built in wireless camera!" Or "It's got carbon fiber lid!"), I always think to myself "Come on, those aren't new." That's like saying, "Wow, this thing has a 100GB hard drive that spins at 5400 rpms!" Not new.

Notebook forums is the place to be. Too bad so many people think that C-Net and the like are the leaders in tech knowledge.

-Ransom
post #31 of 35
I echo that.
post #32 of 35
Anyone else find it odd that the US cnet review gives it 3 hours 20 minutes of battery and the UK cnet review gives it 3 hours and 50 minutes of battery life?
post #33 of 35
It all depends on how high above sea level you are.

J/K. Battery tests are relative. If you run it with the settings set right, you can get another 30 minutes out of a good mobile notebook.
post #34 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ransomed1
It all depends on how high above sea level you are.

J/K. Battery tests are relative. If you run it with the settings set right, you can get another 30 minutes out of a good mobile notebook.
I ment since they are both Cnet, shouldnt they have the same test software that they use, and if that is the case shouldnt the tests have the same results unless one of the 2 sites went in and played with some setings on the laptop or something else was wrong.
post #35 of 35
Unless Cnet has very strict testing rules, differences are likely to occur. It's also not likely that they have such strict rules, since systems can be so different. For example, some vendors provide utilities to fine-tune power settings (e.g., Sony has a utility that will sense the foreground application and tune the settings appropriately, such as set the screen to highest brightness when playing a movie); other vendors rely exclusively on the basic Windows power settings.

So, it would be difficult in such cases to ensure that the systems are set at _exactly_ the same levels. Indeed, it wouldn't even be desirable: a vendor that provides more granular settings that allow for finer control over power, and thus potentially better performance, should be rewarded for providing such capabilities, I think.

So, it seems entirely possible that one Cnet group had the 8204 at one setting when running the benchmark, while the other group had the settings at another level. Even a slight difference, say in brightness, could easily account for the delta.

Or, it could be gremlins...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Acer Notebooks
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Acer Forums › Acer Notebooks › Acer Travelmate 8204wlmi review on cnet.com