New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sager vs Fujitsu screens?

post #1 of 7
Thread Starter 
Does anyone know which offers the better screen in terms of contrast, clarity and colors? Sager's 15" SXGA+ Active Matrix with Super Clear Glossy Surface Display, Fujitsu's 16" Crystal View TFT screen or Sony's Xbrite? The Sager seems to offer the best performance spec with 128MB video Ram compared to just 64Mb. I need this for acurate imaging editing in Photoshop and printing as well as some games etc
Thanks
post #2 of 7
I am reading your posts with interest, because I was just recently bemoaning the fact that the majority of the notebook research gurus were primarily interested in configuring the dream notebook for gaming, rather than for photography and graphics design, which is what I'm interested in. Of course, I'm not as much help because I don't live anywhere that I can see any of the screens you have mentioned in person. I can tell you that by far, the Fujitsu websites are the most cooperative about publishing their contrast ratios and viewing angles. I haven't been able to come up with similar numbers for the other screens, except for guesses and unofficial hearsay. The Fujitsu MVA and Clear View screens both have viewing angles of 160 degrees in all directions. The MVA offers contrast ration of 400:1 and Clear View is 600:1. It offers 16 million colors. There have been several threads about comparison of monitors (read Screens, screens, and more screens) and I'm sure LeeT and jmkay03, proud and happy owners of the Fujitsu N5010 Clear View screen will be chipping in any moment to put in their two cents worth, as they have both done their screen research. It seems from reading the posts that people are very impressed with the appearance of the Toshiba CASV, Sony XBrite, and Fujitsu MVA screens, but the few lucky ones who have seen them all seem to favor the MVA ones. However, I think as gamers, they are looking as much at response time, rather than color gamut and fidelity. How are you planning to calibrate your monitor? Also, do you really need more than 64 mb of video memory for still image editing?
post #3 of 7
Thread Starter 

screens for image editing

For Photoshop 64Mb will be fine. At some stage I will want to do some 3D modelling and video editing. I also use a GIS/CAD package. However for my photo work color gamut and fidelity are very important. I have a Lacie monitor which i will use at home or the studio. When on the road or abroad I want a good laptop screen. As for calibration i hear from another post that EyeOne worked fine, and according to Lacie there calibration tool should work as well. I understand that ones working space affects the calibration. I cant calibrate all the time just when i am away in one local for a while. I am based in the US but I spend a few weeks at a time in the UK.
post #4 of 7
Thread Starter 
PS One problem with Sager may be their support outside the US/Canada
post #5 of 7
I'm not sure anyone has beaten the clarity and crispness of Fujitsu's N5010, especially in written terms, but the margin we are discussing here is rather minimal.
From my understanding, I don't believe any of Sager's current screens come close to that of even the "older" MVA technology; and even more, X-Brite, CASV, and Crystal View..
If you are trying to compare the screens by numbers, I'm hoping this would help:
(note: this information is taken from fujitsu's site)
16" Crystal View SXGA+ (1400x1050)
external max: 1600x1200
600:1 Contrast, 160 degree viewing angle, 20ms response time
Again, I can only tell you what I've seen, And I own this machine, And I love it.
post #6 of 7
jmkay is right - the three manufacturer's of laptop lcd screens mentioned are in a different league.
post #7 of 7
Purchase a laptop with the old screen technology and you will kick youself in 6 months when every laptop manufacturer is on the bandwagon and you have seen the difference.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Sager & Clevo Notebooks