I am researching a laptop to replace my 4 year-old Winbook XL3. The Dell Inspiron 8600 is a major contendor. But I have been concerned about all the reports of problems with the Track Stick buttons (I have a definite personal preference for using the Track Stick), but it's impossible to know how common a problem this really is (since only the ones with problems will complain, post and report).
So how many of you 8600 users out there find your TrackStick buttons to work just fine?
I'm also debating on the resolution: 1680x1050 seems more reasonable for a 15.4" display than 1920x1200 (in terms of font sizes, ease of viewing, etc.). But I have read reports here that the 1680x1050 leaves a lot to be desired, and they preferred the 1920x1200.
Any comments on this issue?
I'm also considering the GW 505XL - the 1280x800 seems a tad low, and I have noted the reports of at least some feeling contrast and overall quality leaves much to be desired - but this otherwise looks like a viable option.
Also looking at the Fujitsu N3010, but there would be no way for me to see and evaluate this unit. But it is a bit heavy, with what looks like poor battery life.
Thanks for any help or insight on these issues.
Don
DLC Photography
P.S. For reference, here's a summary of what I'm looking for and why:
A. high quality display for working with digital images (my primary
passion)
B. minimizing size and weight without too much harm to A
C. longer battery life preferable for the occasional plane trips
D. ability to burn DVD's (probably rewritable) to backup my digital photos
while out of town shooting
E. reasonable system and video speed to run Photoshop and similar graphics
applications.
F. wireless internet access is not an issue and would likely not be used (I
have ethernet cable to my bedroom and desk)
So how many of you 8600 users out there find your TrackStick buttons to work just fine?
I'm also debating on the resolution: 1680x1050 seems more reasonable for a 15.4" display than 1920x1200 (in terms of font sizes, ease of viewing, etc.). But I have read reports here that the 1680x1050 leaves a lot to be desired, and they preferred the 1920x1200.
Any comments on this issue?
I'm also considering the GW 505XL - the 1280x800 seems a tad low, and I have noted the reports of at least some feeling contrast and overall quality leaves much to be desired - but this otherwise looks like a viable option.
Also looking at the Fujitsu N3010, but there would be no way for me to see and evaluate this unit. But it is a bit heavy, with what looks like poor battery life.
Thanks for any help or insight on these issues.
Don
DLC Photography
P.S. For reference, here's a summary of what I'm looking for and why:
A. high quality display for working with digital images (my primary
passion)
B. minimizing size and weight without too much harm to A
C. longer battery life preferable for the occasional plane trips
D. ability to burn DVD's (probably rewritable) to backup my digital photos
while out of town shooting
E. reasonable system and video speed to run Photoshop and similar graphics
applications.
F. wireless internet access is not an issue and would likely not be used (I
have ethernet cable to my bedroom and desk)






