New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

3dmark2003 - Page 6

post #101 of 125
9/2/03 at 11:13pm
857 for my measly i8200 with p4 2ghz and a mobility 9000 64
Reply
Reply
post #102 of 125
9/3/03 at 12:27am
It seems that the 8890's audio doesn't support the sound tests in 3dmark03?

Or am I missing something?
Reply
Reply
post #103 of 125
9/3/03 at 3:47pm

Toshiba P25-S607

My Toshiba P25-S607 just out of the box this last Sunday...

P4 - 2.8Ghz w/ HT
Intel 865PE + ICH5 Chipset running 800 FSB
512 Mb PC2100 (yea, I know it sucks)
NVidia GeForce FX Go5200 64Mb

3dmark03 (330) : 1309
Reply
Reply
post #104 of 125
9/22/03 at 3:56pm
Anyone have an answer for the audio tests not being supported?
Reply
Reply
post #105 of 125
9/22/03 at 6:02pm
Quote:
Originally posted by Januaryman
Anyone have an answer for the audio tests not being supported?
the audio tests works fine for me. try updating ur audio drivers:
http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/...&Software=True
Reply
Reply
post #106 of 125
9/22/03 at 7:02pm
Thanks...I'll give that a try when I get home.
Reply
Reply
post #107 of 125
9/22/03 at 7:34pm
to make 3dmark 2001 work with DX9 you just have to install the update (build 330) and it works.

-Jcc2k4
Reply
Reply
post #108 of 125
9/22/03 at 9:30pm
Hey Januaryman,

I seem to have the same problem with the 60-sound test in 3DMark 2003 (patch 330). The first 2 soundtests work fine, but the third one is automaticly greyed out. I am using the latest soundrivers from the Realtek website.
Is this the same for everybody or are some people able to run the last soundtest with their 8890?
Reply
Reply
post #109 of 125
9/22/03 at 10:33pm
if i remember i could only run 2 sound tests. but for some reason the first test will run but with no sound. the second test works with sound. never knew there was a third test.
Reply
Reply
post #110 of 125
9/23/03 at 4:18am
Quote:
Originally posted by Jebus
but for some reason the first test will run but with no sound
For some strange reason the 1st soundtest is a NO-SOUND test in 3DMark.
Reply
Reply
post #111 of 125
9/23/03 at 11:28am
After installing the latest Realtek drivers, now 2 of the 3 the sound tests work (except for the 60), and I also noticed that in the first "sound" test there is no sound... WTF? That dosn't make any sense to me.

I was expecting that my benchmark score would go up (due to the fact that I could run 'more' of the tests), but it didn't change.
Reply
Reply
post #112 of 125
9/25/03 at 11:58am

Benchmark Results for 5680

I just ran my new 5680 through 3dsmark2003, ver 330.

Sager 5680-
3.2 ghz P4 800 fsb, HT enabled
Radeon 9600 Pro 128 MB DDR
1024 MB 400 DDR Dual Channel Ram
No overclocking attempted

I'm using the patched drivers off of sager's site.

Score: 2981
Reply
Reply
post #113 of 125
10/8/03 at 6:52pm
Using Powerstrip, I upped the 8890's M10 engine clock to 418 and the memory to 310, and scored 3571 on 3DMark03 and 12,007 on 3DMark2001SE.

Computer has been running stable, games are running fine. It makes one wonder how far can we push the M10?
Reply
Reply
post #114 of 125
10/8/03 at 7:47pm
Quote:
Originally posted by Babbabresaur
Using Powerstrip, I upped the 8890's M10 engine clock to 418 and the memory to 310, and scored 3571 on 3DMark03 and 12,007 on 3DMark2001SE.

Computer has been running stable, games are running fine. It makes one wonder how far can we push the M10?
Is your puter noticibly warmer? I'm a bit leary about OCing it, as it has been giving out awsome performance in almost everything.

The only thing that has run at all slow on my 5680 is Halo - but from what I have heard it runs slow on everybody's computer.
(Including Radeon 9800 desktops)

There is a command line switch you can pass the game that forces it to use 1.0 or 1.1 pixel shaders instead of 2.0, which boosts the frame rate by a huge amount, but it still slows down slightly during gun fights and that’s at 1024x768. I would _love_ to play it smooth at 1600x1200, and I'm a bit disappointed that I can’t - though it’s obviously the game, not the hardware. I mean UT2003 runs great at 1600x1200, and you could sit here and argue all day about which one has better graphics...

But would OCing really improve that? With all the positive results people have been posting about it, maybe I'll give it a shot, unless anybody already has?
Reply
Reply
post #115 of 125
10/9/03 at 7:44pm
The 8890 is not running hot, the adapter nor the computer run noticibly warm during gaming even when OC'd. Note that I have my laptop elevated somewhat on a stand that I bought for it at Best Buy, so it is properly ventilated.
Reply
Reply
post #116 of 125
10/10/03 at 4:38pm
Just received my 8890 today and gave it a run thru 3dmark 2003.

Score 3018

My system details listed below.
Reply
Reply
post #117 of 125
10/20/03 at 11:55am
I got 3385 OC's to 417 and 274. With the latest drivers. I cant remember exactly, but I think the cat 3.8's gave me a higher score.
Reply
Reply
post #118 of 125
2/27/04 at 11:47am
You mean the difference between the 8887 and the 8890 is 900 vs 3000?!? WOW
Reply
Reply
post #119 of 125
2/27/04 at 1:03pm
3DMark03 with my 5680: ~2700 on battery ( 3.0 GHz ) will test it with the AC later on.
Reply
Reply
post #120 of 125
2/29/04 at 8:43pm
almost 3000 with the AC plugged in.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Sager & Clevo Notebook Reviews