NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Business (Vostro, Latitude, Precision) › just blew $770 bucks on 2 x Dell 2005FPW
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

just blew $770 bucks on 2 x Dell 2005FPW - Page 2

post #21 of 44
the e1705/9400 has 4 possible video devices: Built-in LCD, DVI, VGA, Svideo. Any 2 can be used simultaneously. It's a shame, really, that we can't do more

Of course, there's that new video splitter thingy from Matrox, I think, that can give you more possibilities, but it only supports a maximum of 1280x1024 on each video connection.
post #22 of 44
Thread Starter 
hey garbuckle did u connect the TV to SVIDEO or vga ? (im assuming the 2405 used the dvi out)
post #23 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by elkq
So you now have a 2405 and previously had the 2005s but you wont spend a few bucks to get them off that table you stole from work?
why don't u read my later post. you try to be nice and post a pic to help someone out and someone always has to be a douche in some way or another.
post #24 of 44
I had the TV on DVI and 2405 on VGA... but only temporarily for testing. I now only have the 2405 hooked up to DVI, as the TV is hooked up to my old desktops AIW9800pro until I sell the system. I did try all the configurations, and I could only enable 2 displays at a time.

Your 20 inchers should be nice! Mmmmm, 40 inches of laptop goodness....

I was almost going to go for the 37" Dell TV, but sitting so close to such a small resolution didn't make sense, plus my current TV already supports that res should I need it. And then... the price and reviews...
post #25 of 44
Thread Starter 
was there a marked difference btw the 2405 on DVI vs Vga?
post #26 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by elkq
So you now have a 2405 and previously had the 2005s but you wont spend a few bucks to get them off that table you stole from work?

what does that really have to do with anything? He is actually helping out by posting up some good shots of his setup and you have to nitpick aobut something that doesnt even matter.

And if you took the time to read the thread he has since changed desks.

(But living in a college dorm I see nothing wrong with the first desk. )
post #27 of 44
Thread Starter 
Yup, back in my old college dorm, for awhile i had no desk or chair, so i used a box as a desk, and the floor for a chair for like 2 weeks until i upgraded to a handme down chair/desk.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwain
what does that really have to do with anything? He is actually helping out by posting up some good shots of his setup and you have to nitpick aobut something that doesnt even matter.

And if you took the time to read the thread he has since changed desks.

(But living in a college dorm I see nothing wrong with the first desk. )
post #28 of 44
Is it even posible to game with both of those at once? I personaly would have gone for just one monitor, as I would be looking back and forth constantly, not to mention giving up DVI on one of them.
post #29 of 44
770$??? I hope that includes tax... because you should've gotten them both for right at 700$ after the instant off and the 60/65$ off code.

And ordered them each seperately of course.
post #30 of 44
I couldn't really tell a difference, but then again, I wasn't really looking because I had no intention of using it on VGA; it was just to see how multiple displays work. I just prefer DVI 'cause I know it's digital, and saves the Digital-Analog-Analog-Digital conversion over VGA. VGA will allow a couple of extra adjustments in the menu, however, compared to DVI (e.g. contrast on DVI must be done in your video driver).

No, you can only select ONE display as your primary display. Movies and 3D games will only play on the primary display (flight sim might be a different story, as I've heard of people running it on multiple monitors). That's one reason I went with a single big monitor. For me, it would also be weird having my center of vision being the bezels between two monitors.

Maybe I'll do some more testing when I get home. TGIF.
post #31 of 44
Not that it in any way impacts the deal you got, but it looks like the 2007WFP is on its way pretty darn soon

http://support.dell.com/support/edoc...P/en/about.htm

(looks like it mostly added a more aluminum look more than any features of note....)
post #32 of 44
hmm - looked at the 2007wfp link you gave. Something I noticed:

16 ms typical response. Seems a bit slow, ins't it? I've heard of 4 ms, and 8 seems to be available in quite a few models...

1680 x 1050 max res.? Is that right? Seems strange, given that the 17 laptops like i9400 go to 1920 x 1200. I would have hoped it could scale to same res as laptop, so you could run native res.

Am I missing the boat here - are these things unimportant?
post #33 of 44
I read the other post and you always get somebody that can't take a joke. You didn't go off on some 'I go to the ends of the earth to help you people' on the post before you explained about the desk. I was just noting that you have about three house payments worth of beautiful gear on a table that looks like one I would see in a break room.

Take it easy fella and spread your 'douches' evenly.
post #34 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geth2
hmm - looked at the 2007wfp link you gave. Something I noticed:

16 ms typical response. Seems a bit slow, ins't it? I've heard of 4 ms, and 8 seems to be available in quite a few models...

1680 x 1050 max res.? Is that right? Seems strange, given that the 17 laptops like i9400 go to 1920 x 1200. I would have hoped it could scale to same res as laptop, so you could run native res.

Am I missing the boat here - are these things unimportant?

I think the response time thing is that dell tends to lie less than other mfgs when it comes to lcd specs. (there are lots of ways to measure it.... white-black grey-grey etc.)

The resolution is pretty standard for 20 in widescreens (it's the same as the 2005FPW under discussion here) for 1920x1200 on desktop screens you generally have to go to the 23 or 24 inch models.

Laptops have much higher resolution per screen size because (theoretically) you are much closer to them. I type this on a 1920x1200 15.4 inch laptop, but that doesn't mean that I'd want my desktop monitor to be ~2560x1600 at 20 inches, cause there's no way I'd be able to read it.... Instead of being 1-3 feet from it, I'd prolly be more like 3-8feet from it, and that makes a pretty big difference.
post #35 of 44
thanks Darth. I guess I am right in planning (assumming the money gods play nicely) to get something in the vein of a 2405 (I think that's the number), when I get my i9400.

CiaO 4 NoW
post #36 of 44
Were there any coupons used? Or just the deal on the website?
Thanks.
post #37 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geth2
thanks Darth. I guess I am right in planning (assumming the money gods play nicely) to get something in the vein of a 2405 (I think that's the number), when I get my i9400.

CiaO 4 NoW
If you're looking for a desktop 1920x1200 lcd, then yes, the 2405 is probably your best bet.
post #38 of 44
Thread Starter 
used the 35 off 300 coupons....
post #39 of 44
a few small questions..

1) What are the main differances between the 2005FPW and the 2007FPW?? And should I go w/ the 2007FPW?

2) IS going widescreen a waste? I do some gaming as well, and worry about the stretch factor. *or even worse 4:3*

Thanks!!
post #40 of 44
1: styling and hdcp compatibility
2: many games currently (and most future games) do support widescreen. I have a 1920x1200 15.4 inch laptop and I don't mind the stretch in games where I have to. (But maybe that's just me). I do love the multitasking benefits of widescreen.... (mmmmm.... 2 full size windows open next to each other....mmmm)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Business (Vostro, Latitude, Precision) › just blew $770 bucks on 2 x Dell 2005FPW