Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kainco
Allow me to add to that board a couple of things:
1. As previously said, you missed the X800XT which has 16 pipes and beats 6800Ultra, however, the lack of SM 3.0 affects its "futureproofness". 2. The 6800 Vanilla if overclocked appropriately (9300 like) is faster than the X1600 due to its 256bit memory as opposed to the 128bit of the X1600 (though has 256 ring-bus internally). 3. The X700 is faster than the X1400, but again, it lacks SM 3.0 4. The 128MB 6600 is as fast as the 256MB variant (very rare) and is faster than the 7400. I'll give the following table of 3DMark 2005 scores: X1800: I know it gets 5200 marks at WSXGA and 4xAA and 16xAF while a 400/1000 7800GTX gets almost 4150. 7800GTX: between 7000-8000 depending the OC it has. 7800: about 5000-5500 depending the OC. X850XT: haven't seen it yet 6800Ultra: breaks the 5000 marks, I've seen 5200's 6800go: depending the overclock 4000-4500. X1600: a little bit more than 4000, 1900 on the 2006. X800: not seen it. 7600: haven't seen it yet. 6600 both: about 2500 X700: about 2300 X1400: close to 2100 GF7400: 64 bit memory hurts a lot but is close to 2000. X1300: no idea 7300: no idea X600:1000-1200 depending the laptop X300: don't know, search the forums. I hope this helps. |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mimiman76
This is not meant to be exact, just a better understanding!
|
