Hey everyone, this is my first post, but I've been reading these forums for a few weeks now. Anyway, here's my thread...
Both of these systems have very similar components, and price. They are both above-average gaming notebooks, however they have one main difference. Acer's CPU is Intel, while MSI's CPU is AMD. It's duo core multi-tasking vs. 64 Bit High performance.
The specs:
Acer TravelMate 8200(Intel)
MSI MS-1039(AMD) (click BUY to configure specs to match that of the Acer model)
My question is which notebook is the better buy? The MSI one isn't out until mid-April and doesn't have reviews out either. However, it does come with a glossy screen (good for gaming & other media), and a much respected 64bit AMD Processor.
Since the notebooks are so similar, does it only come down to multi-tasking vs. 64 bit, or the weight, battery life, and glossy/matte of the screens? Or, is one company (Acer/MSI) better than the other?
Both of these systems have very similar components, and price. They are both above-average gaming notebooks, however they have one main difference. Acer's CPU is Intel, while MSI's CPU is AMD. It's duo core multi-tasking vs. 64 Bit High performance.
The specs:
Acer TravelMate 8200(Intel)
MSI MS-1039(AMD) (click BUY to configure specs to match that of the Acer model)
My question is which notebook is the better buy? The MSI one isn't out until mid-April and doesn't have reviews out either. However, it does come with a glossy screen (good for gaming & other media), and a much respected 64bit AMD Processor.
Since the notebooks are so similar, does it only come down to multi-tasking vs. 64 bit, or the weight, battery life, and glossy/matte of the screens? Or, is one company (Acer/MSI) better than the other?









