New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Help with dv8000t video options

post #1 of 15
Thread Starter 
Hello. I'm a new poster to the boards and in March bought a dv8000t with 1GB system memory and the Geforce Go7400/128MB. When I check with various benchmark and utility programs, it's showing 512MB video memory. Now, I realize that it's probably sharing, but I don't have any options with managing the sharing allocation. I'd like to reduce or even turn off the sharing and just run with the dedicated, but I have no option in the BIOS (F.08A) or in the nvidia (8.3.2.0A) settings.
I talked to HP support a few times and have been told various things, ranging from:
1) I have 512 MB dedicated video memory, supported by the fact that when viewing System Properties from My Comp it shows all of my system ram (1GB), whereas if there was memory shared it the system ram would be reduced by the shared amount (is this true?)
to
2) I need an "expansion card" in the expansion slot in order to have dedicated video memory, without it all of the memory is shared.
I know #2 can't be right, but I wonder about #1.


Some of the benchmark info I'm seeing seems very strange:
the bus width = 256-bit (can't be right)
the 2D core and memory frequencies are lower than the 3D core/mem freqs (don't recall exact numbers, laptop not here)
total vid mem shows 512M, texture mem ~369M

Can anybody explain this, at least better than HP?

for the record I'm using :
PC Wizard 2006 v1.68
3DMark05 score = 1998
HP Pavilion dv8000t CTO NB
XP Home SP2
CoreDuo processor T2400 (1.83 GHz)
17.0" WXGA+ BrightView (1440x900)
128MB GeForce Go 7400
1.0GB DDR2 SDRAM (2x512MB)
80 GB 5400 RPM SATA Hard Drive
DVD/CD-RW Combo Drive
Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network w/Bluetooth
post #2 of 15
I get the same thing on mine, it is very wierd
post #3 of 15
Thread Starter 
Hey baltimoredsmguy, have you run any benchmark or utilities on you video setup? Just wondering if you're getting similarly strange numbers, like the very low memory frequency and bandwidth. Here's what PCWizard2006 says about mine:
General Information :
Manufacturer : Nvidia Corp (Hewlett-Packard Company)
Bus Type : PCI-Express

Total Memory : 512 MB
Texture Memory : 369 MB
Processor : GeForce Go 7400
Converter : Integrated RAMDAC
Refresh Rate (min/max) : 59/60 Hz

Number of GPU : 1
Codename : NV46
Revision : A3
Bus : 256-bit
Memory Type : SDRAM
GPU Frequency : 1350 MHz - [initial : 450 MHz]
Memory Frequency GPU : 22.65 MHz - [initial : 700 MHz]
Memory Bandwidth : 725 MB/s
2D Core : 100 MHz

2D Memory : 270 MHz
3D Performance Core : 450 MHz
3D Performance Memory : 700 MHz
3D Reduced Power Core : 200 MHz
3D Reduced Power Memory : 400 MHz
Anti Aliasing Mode : OFF
Frames Buffered : 3
ForceWare Version : 6.14.10.8320
Video Bios Information :
Date : 12/06/05
Version : Version 5.72.22.31.04
ID : Version 5.72.22.31.04

In DirectX configuration in PC Wiz
Driver Information :
Model : NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
Driver : nv4_disp.dll
WHQL Level : Yes
Version : 6.14.10.8320
Revision : 161
Type : 2
Vertex Shader Version : 1.1
Pixel Shader Version : 1.4
Memory Information :
Video Memory : 385 MB free on 387 MB
Local Video Memory : 385 MB free on 387 MB
AGP Video Memory : 0 MB free on 0 MB
Texture Memory : 385 MB free on 387 MB
post #4 of 15
Hey guys, just go to:

http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/s...tem=ob-40645-1

Download the new driver, Release Date: 2006-05-15, Version: 8.4.5.4 A
It is supposed to fix the "issue where the NVIDIA Control Panel did not display correctly in DualView mode (LCD and CRT)".

But here's what happened:

Manufacturer :Nvidia Corp (Hewlett-Packard Company)
Bus Type :PCI-Express
Total Memory :256 MB
Texture Memory :497 MB
Processor :GeForce Go 7400
Converter :Integrated RAMDAC
Refresh Rate (min/max) :59/60 Hz
GPU Information :
Memory Type :SDRAM
GPU Frequency :1350 MHz
Memory Frequency GPU :22.65 MHz
Memory Bandwidth :725 MB/s

GPU Configuration :
2D Core :100 MHz
2D Memory :270 MHz
3D Performance Core :450 MHz
3D Performance Memory :700 MHz
3D Reduced Power Core :200 MHz
3D Reduced Power Memory :400 MHz
Anti Aliasing Mode :OFF
Frames Buffered :3
ForceWare Version :6.14.10.8454

Video Bios Information :
Date :03/16/06
Version :Version 5.72.22.41.61
ID :Version 5.72.22.41.61
post #5 of 15
Thread Starter 
Yep, just did that the other day before seeing your post. The new BIOS is F.13A (released late May), replacing F.09A from April. Now my benchmarking/diagnostic utilities (PCWizard and DxDiag) show 256MB video memory - down from 512- but now show 500MB texture memory - up from 369MB. The reported memory frequency and throughput still seem wrong, though. Don't you think "Memory Frequency GPU :22.65 MHz
Memory Bandwidth :725 MB/s" is awfully low? Despite the BIOS update, my video benchmarks have been unaffected, since I'm still getting about 2000 in 3DMark05.
Also, there's still no option in the BIOS to turn of sharing, which makes me wonder what we've actually got under the hood. Did they just give us 256MB dedicated, or did they leave out the option of turning off sharing?

Chris
post #6 of 15
Just a "possible" word of warning --not 100% sure of this, but it seems that HP disabled Coolbits w/ the latest driver 84.54. For some reason changing my settings could not be saved. Rolling back to 83.20 seemed to resolve this.

As for the topic--it's never really been solved, has it? Sandra reports my 7400 as having 128MB dedicated and 384MB shared--at least this is how I'm interpreting it. And chris, your memory bandwidth should be 7.2GB/sec, not 784 MB. What the h*** is going on here?
post #7 of 15
Thread Starter 
Drew, I don't have Sandra installed. Downloading it now to try later. The numbers zdj and I are seeing are being reported by the PCWizard utility. It's possible the software is just mis-interpreting the hardware since it is after all fairly new (but I am running the most recent version of PCW). Note that it's also reporting a bus width of 256 bits, which is way off since the 7400 is supposed to be 64. I'm thinking 64bits x 4 pixel pipes = 256 is what's going on, but I don't think this is the way it's supposed to be reported.

Chris
post #8 of 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris_b
Drew, I don't have Sandra installed. Downloading it now to try later. The numbers zdj and I are seeing are being reported by the PCWizard utility. It's possible the software is just mis-interpreting the hardware since it is after all fairly new (but I am running the most recent version of PCW). Note that it's also reporting a bus width of 256 bits, which is way off since the 7400 is supposed to be 64. I'm thinking 64bits x 4 pixel pipes = 256 is what's going on, but I don't think this is the way it's supposed to be reported.

Chris

You're right Chris... although after we updated the bios + 7400 driver, PCWizard and the NVIDIA apps started "reading" 256 MB...
I'll try Sandra later on and we'll compare our results, ok?
Oh, I forgot: regarding the new BIOS, I didn't notice any changes previous versions.... mine was F.08...

Z
post #9 of 15
Thread Starter 
Installed Sandra07 and it says I have 254MB video and 248MB shared, with 502MB texture. I don't see where Sandra reports on the memory bandwidth, though. Drew, did you get a diagostic on your bandwidth and, if so, from what utility? Or is the number you quoted a spec from somewhere?
When I updated the BIOS from F.08 to F.09, I didn't see any changes with the reported diagnostic values in PCWiz and DxDiag, but I did after installing F.13 and the new NVIDIA drivers. I have to go back and check the results files I saved because I've used both PCWiz06 1.66 (early on) and 1.68 (later), and I don't exactly remember when I switched and what affect the change had on the results. I think the funny "initial" numbers in my previous post
GPU Frequency : 1350 MHz - [initial : 450 MHz]
Memory Frequency GPU : 22.65 MHz - [initial : 700 MHz]
went away when I updated PCW, but the MemFreq and bandwidth have always shown up low.

Chris

post #10 of 15
OK, now this is strange. Sandra is now reporting 512MB/355MB shared?



And Chris, 7.2GB was a number taken off the Nvidia website. Sorry , but it seems I'm adding to the confusion here
post #11 of 15
Thread Starter 
Drew, I suspect you are using an differnt, older BIOS (F.08 or F.09) than I am (F.13) - in your pic below your video BIOS is 5.72.22.31.04, wheras mine is reported as 5.72.22.41.61.
Before updating to F.13, PCWiz 1.68 told be I had:
Total Memory :512 MB
Texture Memory : 369 MB
whereas after BIOS updating (and also the NVIDIA drivers from 8.3.2.0A to 8.4.5.4A), I now see:
Total Memory :256 MB
Texture Memory : 497 MB
Also, are you running Sandra07? It could be that an older version might not properly identify newer hardware.
BTW, I didn't have Sandra installed when I had the older BIOSs installed, so I tell you what it reported. What versions of the BIOS and NVIDIA drivers are you running?

Chris
post #12 of 15
Chris, I have the original bios F.08 and drivers 83.20. Reverted back to the original video driver because the newest ones disable overclocking through the Coolbits registry hack. Never updated my BIOS. And I am using Sandra Lite, free version from Extreme Overclocking

The funny thing is--the same screen above reflected Texture Memory at 384MB just two days ago!! Straight answers are needed!
post #13 of 15
Thread Starter 
Drew, I'm also using Sandra Lite (2007 version). I think there's something screwy with the early BIOSs. I say that based on the changes I've seen in what PCWiz reports with the different BIOSs I've used. Now that I'm at F.13, Sandra reports to me, quote:
Total Memory: 256MB (254MBVideo) (248MB System)
I'm assuming that the "Video" means the dedicated RAM and the System refers to the shared memory. I'm also guessing that the texture memory is, by default anyway, completely in shared memory, which could explain why the value being reported is always changing. Today, Sandra reports my texture memory as 502MB, whereas yesterday it was 497MB.

Anybody out there know how the texture memory relates to the physical graphics memory?

Different question for you Drew. How much are you OCing you Go card and how much performance difference does it make? Is it stable? I found some info on the Coolbits hak you are talking about, but it seems like it's been around a long time, which makes me a bit leery about trying it (on newer hardware).

Chris
post #14 of 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris_b
Different question for you Drew. How much are you OCing you Go card and how much performance difference does it make? Is it stable? I found some info on the Coolbits hak you are talking about, but it seems like it's been around a long time, which makes me a bit leery about trying it (on newer hardware).

Chris
I'm using the clocks in my sig (528/860), which are very stable from the default 400/700 MHz settings so far *knocks on wood*. The number wasn't arbitrary, either--when you enable coolbits there is an option to "Detect Optimal Frequencies", the end result being 528/860. Temps are 1-2 degrees higher than stock and range from 46 degrees idle to about 50 after an hours worth of gaming. The fan does not go on any more frequently than when stock (and btw there is an "fan always on" option in coolbits). I also go for a few days at a time in an Always On config with my expansion base and I rarely power down in that period, so that speaks volumes about the stability.

I'm pretty happy with a 300 point OC (stock 7400 Go scores are almost always around the 2000 even mark) -- it makes a difference in games, maybe 2-3 additional FPS, but most importantly it has allowed me to max out the draw distance in GTAIII at 1680x1050

I wouldn't worry too much about using it in newer cards--all the registry hack does is add an Overclock tab to the Nvidia display menu and it works with all of their desktop/notebook cards. What I would worry about is voiding my warranty

EDIT: OK, so a couple of people have warned me that using coolbits will void your warranty regardless, so use at your own risk!!
post #15 of 15
Found this... may explain why differant program are reporting differant fiqures on the ram.

The dv8000t came standard with nVidia's 7400Go series GPU with 128MB GDDR3 RAM, with an option to use up to 376MB of onboard memory, bumping the total to 512MB. The core runs at 450MHz, memory at 700Mhz. I was able to overclock to 507/803 by running the optimal setting with the Coolbits hack and maintained a core temp of 38C under light load and 48C under full load (Short-Media does not endorse use of the Coolbits hack; you could ruin your GPU by overclocking). Lately, HP has upgraded the graphics card in the dv8000t to an nVidia 7600Go series card.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HP, Compaq and Voodoo Notebooks