pc-cillin has a pretty cool name and I've had nothing but awful experiences with Norton.. I had a trial of pccillin, but never bothered to use it, but it's name is nice and reassuring and I think I saw an add for it once that was pretty cool.. but seriously, the cool name is more than enough to make me say that it's better than Norton. I know this wasn't quite what you were looking for, but I've been in a Norton trashing mood for a while.. It really isn't worth it.. a defensless system is about as safe as a system with Norton, and the defensless system will have all of its reasources free.. To the Norton reps in the arena and those of you with wonderful experiences with it, I appologize for my point of view and things may have changed since I last experienced a computer "infected" with Norton...
Heres the other thing, pc-cillin reminds me of antibiotics, which are good at fixing all sorts of bodily infections. Like a good friend on standby with a twelve-gauge, ready to blast whoever's left after you succumb to an illness (or for the sake of the analogy, an ambush of bad guys). Norton reminds me of an old step uncle I had at one point (I think he may have been British or somethign.. distant relative married to my stepmother's sister or something). Norton was his last name and his daughter was an awful child. She kind of reminded me of Lt. Kerrigan after she got infected in starcraft, as she had a very demonic voice, evil hatred and pain spewed from her, and she was in complete control of those around her.. but anyway, to make a long story short, Norton antivirus brings back a number of terrible memories..
