Originally Posted by codek
if m90 is up to par with an m1710 why all the fuss about that it won't perform in games as well as the m1710 even with relatively close 3dmark scores? Also I know nvidia designed the quadro from a cad perspective and the 7900 from a gaming perspective. Shouldn't the cards be better in their respective fields? If the m90 is just as good for real gaming, not just 3dmark scores, why wouldn't everyone go with the m90. Isn't it cheaper, can be used in a business setting because of its looks and you can use cad programs on it?