NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Home (Inspiron, XPS, Studio) › OC'd quadro FX2500M benchmarks
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

OC'd quadro FX2500M benchmarks - Page 5

post #81 of 104
11/12/06 at 6:40pm
i got like 9650 with the gtx mod and 91.31... good luck... rememeber to turn off vsync and sent the card to high performance

what are ur clock/mem speeds?
Reply
Reply
post #82 of 104
11/13/06 at 2:18am
I couldnt get the 91.45 to install so I went to the 91.47, no increase, got 10138 at 625/775. Got 6125 in '06
Reply
Reply
post #83 of 104
11/13/06 at 9:29am
man thats a pretty hardcore memory clock u have there... im gonna try the 91.47 to see if any increase... thanks for the info... btw what processor you have? cuz i got 10184 for 05 and 5758 for 06... ur score is almost the same for 05 but VERY different for 06...
Reply
Reply
post #84 of 104
11/13/06 at 1:22pm
I have the wxga screen is why my 06 score is so much higher. I upped my speeds to 630/790 and scored 10283 in '05 and 6183 in '06. Think those are the highest scores on this board.
LL
LL
Reply
Reply
post #85 of 104
11/13/06 at 1:36pm
U Get 630/790 Estable?

Which drivers did u use for getting 6100 on 3dmark06? i have 625/755 which is now very far from you and my max is 5764 with 91.47
Reply
Reply
post #86 of 104
11/13/06 at 2:11pm
I ended up getting some artifacts so I reflashed to 629/784, and its now stable with 10250 in '05 (i edited the post above not '03 and '05 but 05 and 06). I haven't put AS on my heatsink yet, that might help.
Reply
Reply
post #87 of 104
11/13/06 at 2:53pm
how the hell do u get that high!!!
Reply
Reply
post #88 of 104
11/13/06 at 6:45pm
Dont know, I've hit a point where more core doesnt get me anymore frames. Like in the first game on '05 in the ship I hit about 59 fps and just cant go up no matter what I do....
Reply
Reply
post #89 of 104
11/13/06 at 7:07pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by arkcom
Dont know, I've hit a point where more core doesnt get me anymore frames. Like in the first game on '05 in the ship I hit about 59 fps and just cant go up no matter what I do....

the screen resolution does not matter, unless you are doing the 3dmark06 at 1024x768 in which case i would understand how come u got 6100+ points.

In the ship and with my frecuencies i get 61fps!! estable all the way, and in the "ballon ship" test i get sometimes as high as 77-79 fps...
Reply
Reply
post #90 of 104
11/13/06 at 9:05pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by sergiop
i can play oblivion at 1920x1200 with 4xaa and all settings to high etc, and still get 30fps outside and 60 on the insides...
Right...
Reply
Reply
post #91 of 104
11/14/06 at 7:07am
want proof or what?
Reply
Reply
post #92 of 104
11/14/06 at 12:10pm
Yes, please. Give us a few screenshots of 1900 x 1200 with 4x aa and all settings high, with 30 fps at least being displayed.
Reply
Reply
post #93 of 104
11/14/06 at 12:55pm
there you go 30 fps! with 4xx and all to high, plus setting things to view trees and stuff from faaar distances...



Reply
Reply
post #94 of 104
11/14/06 at 1:30pm
more pictures on the way













I Hope this is good enough for you...

note: i had to convert from bmp to jpeg. i dont know if it means something to the quality.
Reply
Reply
post #95 of 104
11/14/06 at 3:07pm
From what I can tell, 4x AA isn't enabled in those screenshots.

http://xs309.xs.to/xs309/06462/oblivion2.jpg
Reply
Reply
post #96 of 104
11/14/06 at 3:30pm
i am sure it is, however im gonna take more screenshots if you want.

EDIT: you where right, instead of 4aa was hdr or something like that... i changed, but got like 2-3 less fps.. still 28-30 outside. And i cant see the difference







Reply
Reply
post #97 of 104
11/14/06 at 5:42pm
Eh, maybe I'm just in a state of disbelief from my shitty 6800 non ultra .
Reply
Reply
post #98 of 104
11/14/06 at 6:49pm
its ok, not a big deal, tho i have to say that atm my graphics card its oc to a much more higher core and mem than the 7950gtx which is the most powerfull graphics card for laptop atm...

7950gtx 575/600
mine 625/755
Reply
Reply
post #99 of 104
11/23/06 at 6:22pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by sergiop

EDIT: you where right, instead of 4aa was hdr or something like that... i changed, but got like 2-3 less fps.. still 28-30 outside. And i cant see the difference

HDR disables AA.

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_dy...ange_rendering

Having tried it at 1920x1200 with bloom and 4xaa, I have to say I prefer it at a slightly lower resolution and with HDR enabled.
Reply
Reply
post #100 of 104
11/24/06 at 3:16am
Quote:
Originally Posted by sergiop
its ok, not a big deal, tho i have to say that atm my graphics card its oc to a much more higher core and mem than the 7950gtx which is the most powerfull graphics card for laptop atm...

7950gtx 575/600
mine 625/755

I thought the 7950 GTX is a revision of Dell's OC version of 7900GTX?? So you run your 7950GTX @ 625/755?? I figure the default vcore of 7950GTX is 1.32v right? I still using the 7900GTX default vcore @ 1.24v with the setting at my sign. I did not try anything higer because that is the highest setting in my GPU BIO bootdisk. Perhaps I should play with highest setting for fun again. But... I don't see too much different when running a little higher setting...
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Home (Inspiron, XPS, Studio) › OC'd quadro FX2500M benchmarks