New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

m90 gaming benchmarks

post #1 of 6
5/9/06 at 1:06pm
Thread Starter 
I figured I would start a new thread since I was posting them under the "overclocked" 2500m thread and I am running all stock.
I will add some oblivion when time permits.

Here are a few benchmarks with fear sp demo:
1600 x 1200 everything on max, performance, cpu, graphics with 2x anistropic. I ran these during the firefights as much as possible.

Frames Time (ms) Min Max Avg
7066 120000 23 131 58.883


Frames Time (ms) Min Max Avg
7282 120000 36 116 60.683

I ran these all stock with dell drivers.
This review of the 1710 they avged 59fps with same setup on fear.
http://forum.notebookreview.com/show....php?p=1344250.
--------------------------------------------------------------

bf2 benchmarks using fraps:
1920 x 1200 all on high w/ 4x aa

3x 120 sec min/ max/ ave benchmarks on 64 person server with 50 or so people playing:

Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
6771, 120000, 41, 68, 56.425


Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
7970, 120000, 41, 91, 66.417

Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
6933, 120000, 41, 78, 57.775

Single Player mode:

Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
8275, 120000, 48, 95, 68.958


Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
7699, 120000, 19, 98, 64.158


Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
6842, 120000, 32, 72, 57.017


__________________
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 6
5/9/06 at 1:12pm
Wow. Looks like the fx2500 is holding its own against the 7900gtx. I am one step closer to buying an M90

Any idea how the BF2 scores compare? Anandtech has a score but it doesn't really tell us much:- http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/show...px?i=2742&p=11
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 6
5/9/06 at 1:22pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimBob
Wow. Looks like the fx2500 is holding its own against the 7900gtx. I am one step closer to buying an M90

Any idea how the BF2 scores compare? Anandtech has a score but it doesn't really tell us much:- http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/show...px?i=2742&p=11


Yeah look at this review at bottom for 1920 x 1200. http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/show...px?i=2742&p=11 Mine are higher, but it is impossible to know if all settings are same. Too many factors to know for sure, but it is a good guide. Regardless the 2500m rocks.
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 6
5/9/06 at 1:41pm
Isnt the M90 has the matte display (no glossy finish), right? If it is, how does it look for gaming?

Thx
S
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 6
5/9/06 at 1:48pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSingh1975
Isnt the M90 has the matte display (no glossy finish), right? If it is, how does it look for gaming?

Thx
S

It is matte, but it looks great. Mine still has some gloss to it..more than a typical matte finish. It is much more glossy than my fp1907. I will try to take a pic to capture it.


m90

fp1907
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 6
5/10/06 at 12:43pm
Nice pics. Thanks. I read a review saying the M90 screen was too bright if anything, and the reviewer turned the brightness down a notch or two.

I'm glad the screen is slightly glossy, I'd kind of got used to my XPS gen 2 screen after the "sparkles" debate had subsided.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home