NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Alienware Notebook Forums › Alienware General › Alienware Aurora m9700 Review
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Alienware Aurora m9700 Review

post #1 of 55
Thread Starter 
I just saw a review online of the Aurora m9700 (SLI)!!!!

I google'd it and couldn't find any other reviews???? Does anyone know of any others?

http://www.hothardware.com/viewartic...eid=825&cid=10

That thing seems FAST!
post #2 of 55
HOLY SHIT.

I'm sold. Great looking, amazing performance and its not an XPS.

//saves money.
post #3 of 55
yo
post #4 of 55
I've already ordered one, glad to see it looks like a stunner.

I hope the production model is overclockable like the engineering sample in this review. The 7900gs is clocked low enough that a little OC will probably be safe...
post #5 of 55
awww wth. You cant buy the sep 7900? sigh
post #6 of 55
So for gaming do we believe it's faster than the Dell M1710 (with the single 512MB 7900 GTX) and a dual core Intel processor?

UKB
post #7 of 55
According to the reviews, yes. I'm just going to use 3dMark for this, since games wont be the same dpending on the reviewer.

Mark 05- Alien: 9,462
Mark 05- Dell: 8,524

Mark 06- Alien: 4,863
Mark 06- Dell: 4,744

//source http://www.notebookreview.com/defaul...Dell+XPS+M1710

I did the non-oc'd ones, because you can oc the dell too so that's irellevant.

Not too shabby, to be honest.

Thos fooking expensive, another 500 pounds on top of the XPS M1710. Bloody hell, heh.
post #8 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by snafle
According to the reviews, yes. I'm just going to use 3dMark for this, since games wont be the same dpending on the reviewer.

Mark 05- Alien: 9,462
Mark 05- Dell: 8,524

Mark 06- Alien: 4,863
Mark 06- Dell: 4,744

//source http://www.notebookreview.com/defaul...Dell+XPS+M1710

I did the non-oc'd ones, because you can oc the dell too so that's irellevant.

Not too shabby, to be honest.

Thos fooking expensive, another 500 pounds on top of the XPS M1710. Bloody hell, heh.

very sweet, I am almost sold on this thing...but the shipping time is holding me back as the 7700's are now shipping in a week...

oh the decisions...the 7700 is also like G more...argh!!
post #9 of 55
Get the 9700, I'm getting another job to pay for it.
post #10 of 55
is it plagued with the problems my 766 has? the screen doesnt come on sometimes, the graphics card causes distortion, the cd drive doesnt open on its own...
post #11 of 55
We don't know, hasn't been shipped heh.
post #12 of 55
im looking to buy one to replace my 766... this thing sucks
post #13 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by juliebriggs
im looking to buy one to replace my 766... this thing sucks

I'm replacing my 766 with the m9700. I assume you're out of warranty on the 766 or Alienware would address your issues...

The 766 is based on a Uniwill base unit, and it's had some issues... The video module concept didn't take off, so that's the biggest problem as you can't get new modules if the old one dies...

The m9700 is made by Arima, and it uses MXM3 sockets for the graphics cards, so I'm assuming it will be much easier to upgrade in the future.

Things in the laptop market have improved greatly since the 766, so I think no matter what you buy at this point you'll be very happy with the difference...
post #14 of 55
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but aren't they comparing it to the Gen2 XPS? Isn't the 1710 with the 9700 GTX card a Gen3 XPS?
post #15 of 55
Sorry, that's the 7900 GTX card. Typed that fast.

Barry

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBerman
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but aren't they comparing it to the Gen2 XPS? Isn't the 1710 with the 9700 GTX card a Gen3 XPS?
post #16 of 55
Itis, but the specs I posted were from the dell forum from an m1710.
post #17 of 55
i didnt buy mine used... i ebayed it. the video card is ****ed though.. handles most games, but it causes distortion in WoW, COD, and a couple other more demanding games i got (which my 2.19ghz 9600 powered rig handled just fine) im gonna try running it a lil cooler to see if that helps... meanwhile, im looking for something better
post #18 of 55
Did you already buy one (from Ebay) - is that what I am reading? And it is already defective?

Can someone clarify the 9700 only holds 2mb of RAM max with a clock speed of 400mhz? Isn't this slower than the Dell's 667mhz and the Dell holds a max of 4gb?

Does the Dell have a dual-core processor? Does the 9700?

Isn't the Dell magnesium/alloy casing better than the 9700 plastic? Plus I read somewhere the Dell has a mini-shock absorber for the HD.

So why would I buy the 9700 over the Dell? These are serious question as I am dumping my Sager 9860 in the next month and need to replace it before that time.
post #19 of 55
Quote:
Did you already buy one (from Ebay) - is that what I am reading? And it is already defective?

Can someone clarify the 9700 only holds 2mb of RAM max with a clock speed of 400mhz? Isn't this slower than the Dell's 667mhz and the Dell holds a max of 4gb?

Does the Dell have a dual-core processor? Does the 9700?

Isn't the Dell magnesium/alloy casing better than the 9700 plastic? Plus I read somewhere the Dell has a mini-shock absorber for the HD.

So why would I buy the 9700 over the Dell? These are serious question as I am dumping my Sager 9860 in the next month and need to replace it before that time.

They have not shipped from AW yet, so no one has got one off ebay.

The 9700 only holds 2GB of ram, the max windows XP can see is 2.75.

The clock speed of the ram is 400Mhz, like all other current AMD processors, this is the fastest ram you can use, besides the TurionX2, that can use DDR2.

Dell uses the new Intel Core Duo mobile processors, they are dual core. The 9700 uses a Turion 64 mobile processor, this is not dual core.
Dual core will do absolutely nothing to improve gaming unless you are gaming and doing something else at the same time, the something else (lets say the internet) will have its own processor to beat up. No games can use “dual core”. in the case you play a game on a dual core system, only one of the processor cores is used, the other one just sits there doing nothing.




Why buy a 9700 over a dell?

Lol
1)\tI think you’re missing the “BIG DEAL” with the 9700. it is the first ever 17” notebook with SLI. Brefly, SLI is when you have 2 video cards vice one, so in theory you get 100% graphic improvement then using one(its more like 70-80%)
2)\tDell only uses Intel processors, if you’re a gamer, you want AMD. The 9700 uses a AMD processor.
3)\t9700=RAID Dell= No RAID
4)\tWhile you may read some complaints about AW tech support, if you REALLY want to see bad tech support, buy a dell =)
post #20 of 55
Let me agree with marker01. There are very few features within most modern game engines that actually will use a secondary processor. The problem is that most of the functions in the engines require sequential information such as location of the last enemy or a state of attacking. While time-slicing has been proposed in a few articles in Gamasutra, I haven't actually seen an article that is a post-mortem of a game utilizing dual-core enough to make a difference.

This is why I bought a m9700. I don't care about dual-core for games. I have a dual-core desktop workstation for handling 3d modeling, rendering, audio compression and other functions where dual-core will really shine. However, with the laptop I just didn't think that it would matter because I will be gaming with it.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Alienware General
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Alienware Notebook Forums › Alienware General › Alienware Aurora m9700 Review