NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Home (Inspiron, XPS, Studio) › Overclocked E1705/9400 7900 GS Benchmark Results
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Overclocked E1705/9400 7900 GS Benchmark Results

post #1 of 741
Thread Starter 
Below you'll find the highest OC'd 7900 GS powered E1705/9400 notebooks.
For comparison, my stock-clocked 7900 GS (375/1000) scored 6471 in 3DMark05 and 3580 in 3DMark06.
__________________

To overclock, you'll need the bootdisk created by 5150 Joker, found here or you can create your own bootdisk by following zvb's directions, found here. There is also a great guide written by stormlifter, found here.

I strongly suggest you also download ATITool and "Scan for Artifacts". This little program stresses the heck out of your GPU and will give you a good idea if/when you've overclocked too far. ATITool can be downloaded here. If you start getting beeps and see little yellow dots, you've gone too far.

**Disclaimer: I take no responsibility if you damage or kill your video card. Use these procedures at your own risk!**
__________________

3DMark05 Scores
1024x768 Resolution

9330 - andre25 - T2600 / 1GB 533 / WUXGA / 100GB 7200 / Dual-pipe / XGM 91.47 / 90W PS @ 660/1170/1.24V
9227 - 5150 Joker - T2500 / 1GB 533 / WXGA / 60GB 7200 / Dual-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 645/1200/1.24V
9093 - Acebound - T2500 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 100GB 5400 / Dual-pipe / XGM 84.56 / 130W PS @ 640/1186/1.24V
9086 - cell_491 - T2500 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 60GB 7200 / Single-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 640/1200/1.24V
9047 - coold8 - T2600 / 2GB 533 / WUXGA / 60GB 5400 / Single-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 645/1200/1.24V
8871 - pinko - T2500 / 1GB 667 / WUXGA / 100GB 5400 / Dual-pipe / XGM 91.31 / 90W PS @ 600/1200/1.24V
8818 - stigmata - T2500 / 2GB 533 / WUXGA / 60GB 7200 / Single-pipe / XGM 91.31 / 90W PS @ 625/1100/1.24V
8703 - eth - T2500 / 2GB 533 / WUXGA / 60GB 7200 / Single-pipe / XGM 91.31 / 90W PS @ 600/1100/1.24V
8656 - FlashSVT - T2500 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 100GB 7200 / Single-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 575/1150/1.24V
8560 - GameGuru - T2500 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 60GB 7200 / Single-pipe / XGM 84.56 / 90W PS @ 560/1150/1.24V
8531 - Karma Police - T2500 / 1GB 533 / WXGA / 100GB 7200 / Single-pipe / XGM 91.31 / 90W PS @ 575/1150/1.24V
8494 - Final spirit - T2400 / 2GB 667 / WXGA / 80GB 7200 / Single-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 575/1150/1.24V
8402 - Wolfie8000 - T2400 / 1GB 533 / WUXGA / 100GB 5400 / Single-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 570/1150/1.24V
8366 - Azureal - T2500 / 1GB 667 / WUXGA / 60GB 7200 / Dual-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 550/1100/1.24V
8263 - HomerJ - T2500 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 100GB 7200 / Dual-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 550/1100/1.24V
8228 - Chrous29 - T2400 / 2GB 533 / WUXGA / 60GB 5400 / Dual-pipe / XGM 84.56 / 130W PS @ 550/1150/1.24V
8164 - stormlifter - T2400 / 2GB 533 / WUXGA / 100GB 5400 / Single-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 560/1100/1.24V
8092 - Krayziepop - T2250 / 1GB 533 / WUXGA / 60GB 7200 / Single-pipe / XGM 91.37 / 90W PS @ 550/1150/1.24V
8082 - did - T2500 / 1GB 533 / WUXGA / 100GB 5400 / Single-pipe / XGM 91.31 / 130W PS @ 530/1100/1.24V<!-- / message --><!-- attachments -->
8061 - Cookie092 - T2400 / 1GB 533 / WXGA / 80GB 7200 / Dual-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 600/1150/1.24V
8043 - MCF - T2400 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 80GB 5400 / Dual-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 530/1100/1.24V
8026 - TexaStang - T2400 / 1GB 533 / WUXGA / 60GB 7200 / Single-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 530/1150/1.24V
8020 - Spamtek - T2400/ 1GB 533 / WUXGA / 80GB 7200 / Single-pipe / XGM 91.28 / 90W PS @ 510/1200/1.24V
8013 - eL_777 - T2500 / 1GB 533 / WUXGA / 80GB 7200 / Single-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 530/1100/1.24V
7928 - Sunburp - T2400 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 100GB 5400 / Single-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 530/1100/1.24V
7910 - DELL-Machina - T2300 / 1GB 533 / WUXGA / 80GB 5400 / Single-pipe / nVidia 91.31 / 90W PS @ 550/1200/1.24V
7720 - Vyel - T2400 / .5GB 533 / WUXGA / 60GB 5400 / Single-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 530/1100/1.24V
7700 - RioT138 - T2600 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 60GB 7200 / Single-pipe / XGM 91.37 / 90W PS @ 575/1100
7388 - raelious - T2400 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 100GB 7200 / Single-pipe / XGM 84.56 / 90W PS @ 450/1200
7280 - Zeke968 - T2400 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 120GB 5400 / Single-pipe / XGM 84.56 / 90W PS @ 450/1100
7085 - tsxp - T2300 / 1GB 533 / WUXGA / 100GB 5400 / Single-pipe / XGM 91.28 / 90W PS @ 440/1150

3DMark06 Scores
1280x1024 Resolution (WUXGA Display)

5210 - Acebound - T2500 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 100GB 5400 / Dual-pipe / XGM 84.56 / 130W PS @ 640/1186/1.24V
5188 - coold8 - T2600 / 2GB 533 / WUXGA / 60GB 5400 / Single-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 645/1200/1.24V
5032 - stigmata - T2500 / 2GB 533 / WUXGA / 60GB 7200 / Single-pipe / XGM 91.31 / 90W PS @ 625/1100/1.24V
5027 - Steve_lk - T2500 / 1GB 667 / WUXGA / 100GB 7200 / Single-pipe / XGM 91.37 / 90W PS @ 600/1200/1.24V
5007 - EnfinitI - T2600 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 100GB 7200 / Single-pipe / XGM 91.31 / 90W PS @ 600/1200/1.24V
4945 - pinko - T2500 / 1GB 667 / WUXGA / 100GB 5400 / Dual-pipe / XGM 91.31 / 90W PS @ 600/1200/1.24V
4926 - rDigital - T7400 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 100GB 5400 / Single-pipe / XGM 84.63 / 90W PS @ 600/1150/1.24V
4875 - eth - T2500 / 2GB 533 / WUXGA / 60GB 7200 / Single-pipe / XGM 91.31 / 90W PS @ 600/1100/1.24V
4871 - FlashSVT - T2500 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 100GB 7200 / Single-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 575/1150/1.24V
4813 - PcGeek04 - T2500 / 2GB 533 / WUXGA / 100GB 5400 / Single-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 600/1100/1.24V
4669 - Azureal - T2500 / 1GB 667 / WUXGA / 60GB 7200 / Dual-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 550/1100/1.24V
4626 - Krayziepop - T2250 / 1GB 533 / WUXGA / 60GB 7200 / Single-pipe / XGM 91.37 / 90W PS @ 550/1150/1.24V
4197 - ahwang - T2500 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 100GB 7200 / Single-pipe / Stock driver / 90W PS @ 480/1100
4030 - raelious - T2400 / 2GB 667 / WUXGA / 100GB 7200 / Single-pipe / XGM 84.56 / 90W PS @ 450/1200

3DMark06 Scores
1280x800 Resolution (WXGA Display*)

5802 - 5150 Joker - T2500 / 1GB 533 / WXGA / 60GB 7200 / Dual-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 645/1200/1.24V
5559 - stark - T2400 / 2GB 667 / WXGA / 60GB 7200 / Single-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 650/1200/1.24V
5214 - Final spirit - T2400 / 2GB 667 / WXGA / 80GB 7200 / Single-pipe / Stock Driver / 90W PS @ 575/1150/1.24V

*Note: E1705/9400 laptops with WXGA displays run the trial version of 3DMark06 @ 1280x800 vs. WUXGA which runs @ 1280x1024.
__________________

To get your score posted, please use the format below:

Score - Name - CPU / Memory / Screen / HD Size & Speed / Single or Dual-pipe Card / Driver Version / Power Supply @ Core/Memory/Voltage

SCREENSHOT REQUIRED AS BACKUP!

There are plenty of examples of this format above. Take your time, submit it right!

All of the following info is required:

CPU - T2500
Memory - 1GB 533MHz
Screen - WUXGA
HD Size/Speed - 60GB 5400
Single or Dual-pipe Card - Single
Driver - Stock
Power Supply - 130W
Core/Memory/Voltage - 525/575/1.24V
3DMark05 - 8111
3DMark06 - 4605
Screen shot (either attached or a link)

Note: If you have new scores to post, please post them as a new reply in this thread; don't go back and update an old post or the old thread and please don't PM me the data because I'll likely miss it. I'll try to update this as often as I can.
__________________

Now somebody REP me for all my overclockin', benchmark postin', message editin' work!!!!
post #2 of 741
nice scores (bump)
post #3 of 741
CPU - T2400 1.83GHz
Memory - 2GB 533MHz
Screen - WUXGA
HD Size/Speed - 100GB 5400
Single or Dual-pipe Card - Single
Driver - Stock
Power Supply - 90W
Core/Memory/Voltage - 510/550/1.24V
3DMark05 - 7813

I still got room, cause I got no artifacts so far...
post #4 of 741
CPU - T2400 1.83GHz
Memory - 2GB 533MHz
Screen - WUXGA
HD Size/Speed - 100GB 5400
Single or Dual-pipe Card - Single
Driver - Stock
Power Supply - 90W
Core/Memory/Voltage - 560/550/1.24V
3DMark05 - 8164

TEMP RANGE: 60 - 75

Hrmm... Guess I could get more out of it, think I'm done for now though, I don't even have a reason to be OCing, anything I play runs at full graphics right now...
post #5 of 741
Thread Starter 
screens
LL
LL
post #6 of 741
Thread Starter 
updates done for tonight
post #7 of 741
Just so people know, cause I didn't that cool little program FlashSVT uses to display temps is actually REALLY cool, it can control the FANS! ooo...
Click here to DL the English Version
I liked it, pretty awesome, puts a little tray icon with your temps and even turns fans on at specified temps.
Be sure to add at least +8 to the GPU temp, it picks the temp off another sensor that isn't quite accurate.
post #8 of 741
Thread Starter 
Be sure to add 8 degrees to the GPU temp. Last tab under 'options'.
post #9 of 741
Yeah, i added 8, works great after that.
post #10 of 741
I think we should start posting the standard temps we're getting so that we can get an idea of the ranges other people are in.
post #11 of 741
bump
post #12 of 741


I'm still not allowed...

post #13 of 741
I can't believe you're being discriminated against just because you have a M1710. Some of the folks with E1705s are using dual pipe 7900GSs too.
post #14 of 741
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRP
I can't believe you're being discriminated against just because you have a M1710. Some of the folks with E1705s are using dual pipe 7900GSs too.
They're jealous...of my lights...or something...



post #15 of 741
Haha great post/information!

Here's some rep to help out with the discrimination mZimm!
post #16 of 741
mZimm my 1710 with a 7900 gs will be here tomorrow. I will fight against the discrimination with you!
post #17 of 741
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by shicom1
mZimm my 1710 with a 79 gs will be here tomorrow. I will fight against the discrimination with you!
Cool, you can start a new thread.
post #18 of 741
We will pwn you n00bs.
post #19 of 741
Well, I don't have any benchmarks to report, but I did tweak mine up to 550/1100 at 1.24 and played a couple of hours of Battlefield 2. Fan was set on high for everything below.

High temp (reported/unadjusted) by I8fangui was 63c.

3dmark 05 runs topped it out at 65c (reported/unadjusted).

That's pretty cool at 550/1100, IMHO.

Now if I could get my 3dmark score to be above about 7700 I'd be happy.

I'm still getting some stuttering in battlefield 2 especially when loading a new level, and a bit here and there. I'm guessing it's because of the lack of memory. I have a 1gb stick on RMA right now and am running with 1.25gb

I might try to step up the clocks tomorrow.

I'm running 91.31 drivers. has anyone published an optimum driver configuration for this driver set? I would like to get my benches higher and see how it affects the game. From what I'm seeing I should be getting 8100-8300 in 3dmark, and I'm getting more like 7700 (yeah, that's less than 10% but still.... )
post #20 of 741
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vcdechagn
Well, I don't have any benchmarks to report, but I did tweak mine up to 550/1100 at 1.24 and played a couple of hours of Battlefield 2. Fan was set on high for everything below. High temp (reported/unadjusted) by I8fangui was 63c. 3dmark 05 runs topped it out at 65c (reported/unadjusted). That's pretty cool at 550/1100, IMHO. Now if I could get my 3dmark score to be above about 7700 I'd be happy. I'm still getting some stuttering in battlefield 2 especially when loading a new level, and a bit here and there. I'm guessing it's because of the lack of memory. I have a 1gb stick on RMA right now and am running with 1.25gb I might try to step up the clocks tomorrow. I'm running 91.31 drivers. has anyone published an optimum driver configuration for this driver set? I would like to get my benches higher and see how it affects the game. From what I'm seeing I should be getting 8100-8300 in 3dmark, and I'm getting more like 7700 (yeah, that's less than 10% but still.... )
You can definitely get higher than 7700 with a 7900gs. I got 8881 at 630/1100. Temp hit 78c(adjusted) which seems fine to me.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Home (Inspiron, XPS, Studio) › Overclocked E1705/9400 7900 GS Benchmark Results