I am considering buying a new notebook after owning a Dell for about 3 years, and will probably go with an Alienware notebook.
I am very, very impressed with the value in the m9700. I can't believe the base price is only $2000 considering how good it is. I can configure an almost full-featured design for $3600.
I'm just wondering, is there ANY reason to go with the mALX over the m9700? Frankly I don't really know what they were thinking with the mALX:
m9700: RAID (up to 200GB at 7200RPM)
mALX: NO RAID (half that at 7200RPM)
m9700: 1920 X 1200 max resolution
mALX: 1680 X 1050 max resolution
m9700: 4 USB ports
mALX: 3 USB ports
Otherwise same ports except m9700 has an extra VGA port
Same RAM, Processors, Optical Drives, Networking
m9700: $2000 base price
mALX: $4500 base price
!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!!?!
In its favor, the mALX has:
- The GTX cards in SLI as opposed to the GS. This is the only clear and meaningful advantage I see
- 19'' screen over 17'' screen, however the big size increase and the inferior resolution make this a highly dubious advantage. It's not like you are going to be exactly squinting at 17'' and I think 17'' is the upper limit of what can be considered reasonably portable
- PCM-CIA slot versus the m9700's express card slot, allows for supposedly superior sound with Creative Labs Audigy 2
- 4 speakers w/ subwoofer versus 2 speakers w/ subwoofer
- "airbrushed custom paint artwork." HAH!
Reminder:
base price of m9700 is $2000
base price of mALX is $4500
Seriously now. How are those prices justified considering that the m9700 trounces the mALX in 2 of the most important areas, hard drive capacity/speed and screen resolution? Is the difference between the GTX and GS cards so substantial that it makes up for everything the mALX is otherwise lacking?
Just wondering if there is anything I am missing before I buy a m9700...
Also - I've noticed the RAM in either machine is only 400MHz, compared to 667MHz for the Dell M1710. Is that going to have a substantial impact on performance? I can't see how it wouldn't, considering that RAM bus speed is one of the major bottlenecks on processor performance. Maybe I should just get another Dell?
I am very, very impressed with the value in the m9700. I can't believe the base price is only $2000 considering how good it is. I can configure an almost full-featured design for $3600.
I'm just wondering, is there ANY reason to go with the mALX over the m9700? Frankly I don't really know what they were thinking with the mALX:
m9700: RAID (up to 200GB at 7200RPM)
mALX: NO RAID (half that at 7200RPM)
m9700: 1920 X 1200 max resolution
mALX: 1680 X 1050 max resolution
m9700: 4 USB ports
mALX: 3 USB ports
Otherwise same ports except m9700 has an extra VGA port
Same RAM, Processors, Optical Drives, Networking
m9700: $2000 base price
mALX: $4500 base price
!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!!?!
In its favor, the mALX has:
- The GTX cards in SLI as opposed to the GS. This is the only clear and meaningful advantage I see
- 19'' screen over 17'' screen, however the big size increase and the inferior resolution make this a highly dubious advantage. It's not like you are going to be exactly squinting at 17'' and I think 17'' is the upper limit of what can be considered reasonably portable
- PCM-CIA slot versus the m9700's express card slot, allows for supposedly superior sound with Creative Labs Audigy 2
- 4 speakers w/ subwoofer versus 2 speakers w/ subwoofer
- "airbrushed custom paint artwork." HAH!
Reminder:
base price of m9700 is $2000
base price of mALX is $4500
Seriously now. How are those prices justified considering that the m9700 trounces the mALX in 2 of the most important areas, hard drive capacity/speed and screen resolution? Is the difference between the GTX and GS cards so substantial that it makes up for everything the mALX is otherwise lacking?
Just wondering if there is anything I am missing before I buy a m9700...
Also - I've noticed the RAM in either machine is only 400MHz, compared to 667MHz for the Dell M1710. Is that going to have a substantial impact on performance? I can't see how it wouldn't, considering that RAM bus speed is one of the major bottlenecks on processor performance. Maybe I should just get another Dell?





The mALX would be able to push those screens while the 9700 would have some trouble at native resolutions
)
