Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chezouff
dude the whole card is different if you take a look at it i have both and the entire card has way more transistors and parts on it.
|
I'm not debating the transistors on the card as I count that to be inconsiquential since I have never heard a video manufacturer brag about board transistors; it's the actual GPU transistors (190 million in this case) that matter and it's the same for both of these cards. They all started using the same NV41 core (moved to NV42 later I believe), they have the same number of pixel pipes (16), and the only difference in the two was/is the clock speed of the GPU and the Memory speed. I don't think you can put much stock in just the visable differences in the two (other than the extra pipe already mentioned).
Check out this link
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2356
Here is an excerpt:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, Dell is introducing their Inspirion XPS Gen 2. The DTR notebook features a 2 or 2.13GHz Pentium M and a GeForce Go 6800 Ultra with 450/550 core/memory clocks. Rather than just ship their Go 6800 at the high core speed, NVIDIA has given it the Ultra moniker to differentiate the product.
The "new" GeForce Go 6800 Ultra graphics card is exactly the same as the original Go 6800, except that we are finally seeing it at the high clock speeds NVIDIA originally promised we would see. For an explanation of the differences between NVIDIA's mobile and desktop products, please see our initial review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not saying that the Ultra is not faster, I'm just saying it's mostly because of the higher clock hence more heat as opposed to the GTX which had major architecture changes and can do the same stuff cooler. The Ultra is still outstanding compared to other solutions and if that's your budget then rock on.