Hi everyone.
I'm having trouble deciding between the Fujitsu N5010 and Mitac 8355 notebooks. Here's a summary of each:
Fujitsu N5010:
LCD: 16.1" SXGA+, 20ms response time
CPU: P4 3.0GHz w/ HT
RAM: 512MB, 333MHz
Graphics: M10 64MB
Battery Life: 2 hours max
Weight: 10.4 lbs.
Mitac 8355:
LCD: 15" SXGA+, 25ms response time
CPU: AMD64 3200+
RAM 512MB, 400MHz
Graphics: M10 128MB
Battery Life: 3 hours max
Weight: 7.9 lbs.
I was at first leaning heavily toward the N5010 because of its beautiful screen, but the 8355 has better battery life, graphics performance, computational power (most of the time), weight, and supported RAM. The N5010 is also too large to quite fit in a backpack. I'm really worried about the quality of the 8355's screen, however.
If anyone has any experience with the screen quality of the Mitac 8355, or can offer some insight into other factors I should consider in this decision, I'd really appreciate the comments.
Thanks,
Zetagauss
I'm having trouble deciding between the Fujitsu N5010 and Mitac 8355 notebooks. Here's a summary of each:
Fujitsu N5010:
LCD: 16.1" SXGA+, 20ms response time
CPU: P4 3.0GHz w/ HT
RAM: 512MB, 333MHz
Graphics: M10 64MB
Battery Life: 2 hours max
Weight: 10.4 lbs.
Mitac 8355:
LCD: 15" SXGA+, 25ms response time
CPU: AMD64 3200+
RAM 512MB, 400MHz
Graphics: M10 128MB
Battery Life: 3 hours max
Weight: 7.9 lbs.
I was at first leaning heavily toward the N5010 because of its beautiful screen, but the 8355 has better battery life, graphics performance, computational power (most of the time), weight, and supported RAM. The N5010 is also too large to quite fit in a backpack. I'm really worried about the quality of the 8355's screen, however.
If anyone has any experience with the screen quality of the Mitac 8355, or can offer some insight into other factors I should consider in this decision, I'd really appreciate the comments.
Thanks,
Zetagauss




