NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Forums - General › Geforce Go 7600 3D rendering
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Geforce Go 7600 3D rendering

post #1 of 17
Thread Starter 
Is it any good. I would like to play games like C&C Generals, Stronghold 2, Battle for Middle Earth 2, RCT 3.

I currently have a ATI Radeon 9250 for my desktop and it works ok. It runs about med to high on those games.
post #2 of 17
well any video card and do it, heck, i have a Geforce 5600 and do 3d max and iClone version 1.0 every once and awhile. It serves me well and i think go 7600 would also be good for what you wanna do
post #3 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by cridgit001
Is it any good. I would like to play games like C&C Generals, Stronghold 2, Battle for Middle Earth 2, RCT 3.

I currently have a ATI Radeon 9250 for my desktop and it works ok. It runs about med to high on those games.

7600go should be able to play all of those games on high, probably with AA as well.
post #4 of 17
yes if all the games you want to play are those than you should be fine with a 7600.
post #5 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by cridgit001
Is it any good. I would like to play games like C&C Generals, Stronghold 2, Battle for Middle Earth 2, RCT 3. I currently have a ATI Radeon 9250 for my desktop and it works ok. It runs about med to high on those games.
Check out this link... and if it helps postive "rep" me... Read the write up, check out the links. Mobile Graphics Card Comparison Chart If you're looking for a gaming laptop, Or doing graphic intensive work the GPU should be your top priority. GPU is the "video card" for those of you who don't know. http://www.notebookforums.com/thread157799.html PS: 7600 rates pretty decent... check out the above info
post #6 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeAreNotAlone
Check out this link... and if it helps postive "rep" me... Read the write up, check out the links.

Mobile Graphics Card Comparison Chart


If you're looking for a gaming laptop, Or doing graphic intensive work the GPU should be your top priority.

GPU is the "video card" for those of you who don't know.

http://www.notebookforums.com/thread157799.html

PS: 7600 rates pretty decent... check out the above info


very nice compliation there
post #7 of 17
WeAreNotAlone- We should try to gather benchmarks for all of those cards to give some frame of reference. And maybe I could put together a Quadro list.
post #8 of 17
if you guy are indeed going to benchmark please dont only use 3dmark because its badly biased. actual game demos would be nice. like the reivews at guru3d.com
post #9 of 17
I totally agree with 3dmark. Sad thing is, everyone here uses it solely.
post #10 of 17
its a very bad way of evaluting performance and its biased. games are a little biased but not as much
post #11 of 17
Your 9250 is a P.O.S. of a card. The 7600 is in a totally different category.

If you think your 9250 plays games "ok".. you will be speechless when you'll get a 7600...
post #12 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystery
Your 9250 is a P.O.S. of a card. The 7600 is in a totally different category.

If you think your 9250 plays games "ok".. you will be speechless when you'll get a 7600...

lol very very very true
post #13 of 17
How is 3DMark biased? Are you going to tell me that there are certain things that Futuremark does so it looks like it runs better on a nVIDIA card, or vice versa for ATI?

And to the OP, if your old ATI card can run them fine, then wouldn't a 7600 run them at an amazing pace? If you're not sure, then why not Google up some benchmarks, or search around on the forums? Search is always your friend...
post #14 of 17
a simple example is x1600 vs 6600gt for desktop. x1600 scores more yet it is slower than the 6600gt in almost every single game
post #15 of 17
Hey guys, Some jerk just gave me a bunch of "neg rep" for above link to the Mobile Graphics Card Comparison Chart http://www.notebookforums.com/thread157799.html 06-27-2006 07:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lordoflands
"naa this aint right 7900 gs has so much more potential than 7800 gtx...when overclocked 7900 gs owns it"
and (1) minute later (LOL) I get a neg rep that knocks my rep score way down... it being worded like it's from someone else... NEG rep not being "signed", person not MAN enough to "sign" their neg rep... 06-27-2006 07:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by by person not man enough to sig neg rep
"ya dude read lords post 7900 gs can outperform 7800gtx easy"
No PM, No chance to correct the info... And I find it very strange that a thread that has not been getting allot of hits at all suddenly gets a post saying "naa this aint right 7900 gs has so much more potential than 7800 gtx...when overclocked 7900 gs owns it".... And then only (1) minute later someone "else" gives a neg rep saying: "ya dude read lords post 7900 gs can outperform 7800gtx easy"... The neg rep being worded like it was someone else who just "happened" to see lordoflands post.. had read thru all the info and then decided to post a neg rep.... all within (1) minute of lordoflands post. Very strange. I guess the person who neg repped me can't read because I even state in the first line right after the BOLD section ends that it was re-post from another board, all credit going to the orginal author Author's name is stated, link to the orginal thread in case new info needs to be added... A neg rep that I'll bet came from a Dell owner. Gives a neg rep without even PM'ing someone. giving them a chance to update, correct something.(LOL) Note for the record the 7900GS is indeed a very good card.... Thing is if you read the info /check out the orginal thread the AUTHOR of the write up he answered a post by someone who asked "WHY" he didn't include all the overclocking fiqures and benchmarks for every single GPU on the market. (May be wrong but I think he was saying it was a stock to stock comparsion when asked "why" he didn't mention cards that perform better than another when overclocked.) I thought there was allot of usefull info in that thread /post and in the links... for persons in the market that are being told by salesmen selling units with low,low,low,low end GPU's that the GPU will run anything you throw at it well.
post #16 of 17
Ok aintz, you got me there.

Also, WeAreNotAlone, why do you imedately think of a Dell owner?
Well, this Dell owner tired to help you back up
post #17 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by amazin asian
Ok aintz, you got me there.

Also, WeAreNotAlone, why do you imedately think of a Dell owner?
Well, this Dell owner tired to help you back up

Why do I think it was someone from the DELL section of the board?

Main reason is the GPU's being talked about... and a thread the so called "Reputation Points Thread" (or threads) that are ongoing on the Dell section of the board.

I got (1) neg rep that really knocked my rep score down... so this means that it was probally someone who has been posting allot in the rep thread: http://www.notebookforums.com/thread90438.html

Why would I think so? Simple.. the "rep" thread is a thread in which people post in asking for people to artificially boost their rep scores. The have rep circles in which they rep each other, other, and over and over again.... example of a rep circle: http://www.notebookforums.com/post2207755-81214.html

That thread right now is running at 2124 pages with 40 posts per page. Number of posts within that thread right now at 84,940

Number of posts within that thread which may have "useful" info?, useful info that may help somone and deserves a "postive" rep?... maybe 5%... the other 95% of the posts being posts saying hey I just repped you, "rep" me back....
* * * * *

For those that don't know, here's how the "rep" system works and why it is a joke with a thread like the reputation points thread going on in which people are artificially boosting their rep scores. When you read thru the below note the part that says to be sure to sig your rep, so people can rep you back... and the part about the higher your rep score being (once it has been artificially boosted) makes each rep you give out worth more.

What this means is a person that posts in this thread once they get the "rep" score boosted can give others a large neg rep hit points wise by giving (1) neg rep.
* * * *


Now for how the reputation system works...to give someone rep, click on the underneath their username/avatar. You can give either positive or negative rep, but if you give the latter in the "rep thread" (In which you're just supposed to be posting postive reps to get everyone's rep score artificially boosted) you will [be] pummeled to a squishly little pulp real fast by the rep gods. Remember to sign the rep you give so people know to hit you back. You can give ten rep per day (24 hour period) and the amount of points you give per each shot depends on your own rep level (meaning the higher your reputation is, the more your rep is worth to others).

If you have under 100 posts or have negative reputation then whatever rep you give (positive or negative) will show up as grey and not count as anything.

To check your own rep level click on UserCP in the upper nav bar, it will show you the rep you've received, when it was given, for what post it was given, and a comment if the giver left you any. Your total points will be above the comments section...

* * * *

Here's an example... User name DarthPierce joined Feb 2006, close to 2,000 posts so far in only 4 months.... Most all posts being in the "Reputation Points Thread"...

http://www.notebookforums.com/search...archid=2346427

I give the above poster as an example due to the high number of posts within a short period of time, with a large percentage being in the so-called rep points thread. I remember this poster because he had bragged /stated he bought a Compaq computer thru Costco, because he "had" to "have" a "new" computer.. used it for six-months while he was "waiting" for DELL to come out with the options he wanted on a Dell I8600.

I posted asking him if there was anything wrong with it... and the next thing I know my rep score was knocked way down.... 6 neg reps within (2) minutes....

To expand on why it is wrong to "use" something and return it... Lets assume Dell had a six-month return policy and people were buying Dells... using them for six-months... then returning them in-mass to buy not a Dell, but another brand.
Let me ask you as a Dell owner... A: Do you think this is right?, and B: Do you think that such abuses would impact you in the form of higher costs? (Higher costs for YOU when you buy your next Dell... Because of people buying a unit to "use" for six months, then returning it to get ALL of their money back...ALL.)


The above is why I pretty much know it was a Dell owner that neg repped me for no good reason. Everything fits too well together.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Notebook Forums - General
NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Forums - General › Geforce Go 7600 3D rendering