NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Asus Notebook Forums › Asus Notebook Benchmarks › Benchmark: Z96J Benchmark
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Benchmark: Z96J Benchmark - Page 2

post #21 of 50
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mem
OH ****! Thats a big ass increase. Are those the regular omega drivers? And should I install them on my beast right now? I haven't tried installing them yet. So far my score is 3951.

3951 is very good, you don't need Omega drivers.
post #22 of 50
I installed them, uninstalled them then installed intel drivers again and I got 3953 my first time running it, I havent ran it again, Im going to soon to see my score again.
post #23 of 50
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mem
I installed them, uninstalled them then installed intel drivers again and I got 3953 my first time running it, I havent ran it again, Im going to soon to see my score again.
I installed Omega driver and then use ATI Tool to overclock. But there is a risk of damage GPU for the long run, I only use it to run the benchmark.
post #24 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by hyperluminous
Now, when somebody tries to run Oblivion at the native resolution they may find they have to use lower settings than the S96J to get acceptable frame rates. That's where the difference will come into play.

Are you saying the Z96J will take a performance hit on high end games because of the higher resolution?
post #25 of 50
Well, any game takes a slight hit on resolution because it has more rendering. The S96J will slightly work better on some games because its native res is much lower - thus the smaller and faster render. The drop isnt much. Mabye a couple fps. But that all depends on the game really
post #26 of 50
When you sayh long run ken, do you mean like 4 years down the line or sooner? I don't really want to run the risk because i need this laptop for college. Or if I overclock it during games, then clock it back to its regular core speed when im done would that be fine?

and what temp is to high for the S? Mine idles at around 49-51 and when its really worked it goes as high as 56C.
post #27 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by mem
When you sayh long run ken, do you mean like 4 years down the line or sooner? I don't really want to run the risk because i need this laptop for college. Or if I overclock it during games, then clock it back to its regular core speed when im done would that be fine?

and what temp is to high for the S? Mine idles at around 49-51 and when its really worked it goes as high as 56C.
Your temperatures are fine on it. You can't expect a laptop to last in playing games for 4yrs, especially not a 1300$ one.

DirectX 10 is just around the corner, with revolutionizing new graphics and more power hungry games than ever. People with 7900GTX and such as worrying they won't be able to play the new games. If you've seen any pics you'll know why. So I think you're having an unrealistic expectation. Especially since the technology of the X1600 is already nearly 2yrs old.

I've had my 6800GT in my desktop for about 20 months now, and it still beats the best gaming card for a laptop under 15.4". Which means laptop technology is still far behind desktops. I think 3yrs is the best you can expect out of a gaming card for a desktop. And hopefully about 2years from a laptop to play on Medium or acceptable quality settings.
post #28 of 50
That sounds good, the only games that I really play are TFC/CS which I know this computer can handle flawlessly, my friends have gotten me into oblivion but I rarely play games such as that one.
post #29 of 50
You shouldn't need to overclock for those games anyway, so you will be able to game on your laptop throughout college assuming no parts malfuntion and you take good care of it. You may not be able to play all the newest and latest greatest... but all the games that probably matter to you, you will be able to play.
post #30 of 50
why drivers and etc from intel, not ati or asus?
post #31 of 50
ATI: Because they only release mobile drivers for a few manufacturers. They explain on their site that manufacturers do a lot of tweaking to the configuration so they assume no responsibility for making sure it all works.

Asus: Because this is under the Intel VBI umbrella. Intel is assuming the warranty repair for notebooks under this program so they'll be the ones issuing official drivers so that Asus doesn't bork a driver release and force Intel into handling the problems it might cause. (Realistically, I think we're safe using Z96J drivers).

As for gaming, when I decided on a notebook, I was accepting the fact that the hardware was going to determine what games I could and couldn't play. That was fine with me as there are dozens if not hundreds of interesting-sounding games already out that I haven't got around to playing that are bound to be just as good quality as anything else that's coming out. In any case, this is a very nice GPU and I wouldn't be surprised to be able to play almost every new game (with settings turned down) three years from now....especially is Merom increases performance as much as Conroe appears to.
post #32 of 50
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by gochu
why drivers and etc from intel, not ati or asus?

Because Intel buy S96J from Asus and sell it to resellers and they provide support and warranty, but you can also downlaod from Asus website, they sahre the drivers.
post #33 of 50
3DMark 2005 score 4558 at 1024x786 using ATI Tools and Omega Drivers.
Core 505/Mem 468.
Default is 450/370.
Use this setting for benchmark only. Prey plays great at 1280X1024 w/high details using stock. I am going to try some games at native resolution and will report back.
This laptop has exceeded my hopes. Love the extra resolution.
post #34 of 50
Hey.. really impressive. both S and Z... I t kinda made my mind up at buying a Z... I wonder how are the benchs raised up because of the Omega Drivers... how does it works??

Anyways thanx again!
post #35 of 50
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostlarge
3DMark 2005 score 4558 at 1024x786 using ATI Tools and Omega Drivers.
Core 505/Mem 468.
Default is 450/370.
Use this setting for benchmark only. Prey plays great at 1280X1024 w/high details using stock. I am going to try some games at native resolution and will report back.
This laptop has exceeded my hopes. Love the extra resolution.

Hi Mostlarge,
One question, I was able to overclock using Omega Driver and ATI Tool when I bench mark Z96J, but not anymore, all I got was black screen when I set the GPU speed using ATI tool, my quuestion is what version of Omega driver and ATI tool are you using? thanks.

Ken
post #36 of 50
Thanks to Ken and GenTech I now have a working Merom Z96J. After just installing Windows and Asus CD drivers, I ran 3Dmark 5 and 6 at default settings. 3dmark5 = 4044 and 3dmrk6 = 1753.
I'll try the omega's too and report back.
I'm also working on a pictorial review of the barebones build process. Hopefully I can post that too.
post #37 of 50
Very nice...
How much didi you pay in your Merom processor... Im sorry to ask... curiosity...
Nice!
post #38 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikolasvm
Very nice...
How much didi you pay in your Merom processor... Im sorry to ask... curiosity...
Nice!
I got mine from the for sale forum here. You can find them for a little over $400 here or on eBay.
I tried the omega drivers and my scores are the same for 3Dmark5 & 6.
SuperPI is under a minute for 2M calc. 57sec
post #39 of 50
Thread Starter 
Merom 2.16 GHz in 3DMark06:




post #40 of 50
Thread Starter 
Merom Benchmark Updated.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Asus Notebook Benchmarks
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Asus Notebook Forums › Asus Notebook Benchmarks › Benchmark: Z96J Benchmark