New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

aaronjb's Arima W830-DA Review - Page 2

post #21 of 62
Thread Starter 
Right - first update as I have all the info for that right now:

It seems that whoever assembled my machine (either Arima or Evesham) used some kind of thermal pad, rather than thermal paste - whatever it was had set hard and was partially voided at one end of the CPU.

So, I've now cleaned all that off and applied ArcticSilver 5 to the CPU as per the AS instructions:


(sorry for the bad pic, my camera has a lousy macro mode)

Now, on the subject of CPU drivers..

I spent all afternoon running benchmarks with the following procedure:

I created (well, ok, Jos created) an nLite XP Pro CD with all the XP bloat stripped out - it's a tiny CD image - then installed that and didn't install any drivers.

I created a Ghost image of that install so that I'd have a clean install to go back to between every test.

And what I can say is this (screenshots and accurate numbers to follow):

The CPU driver makes next to no difference for me - in fact, the Turion driver dropped my 3DMark scores by 30-50 points.

What made the biggest difference was the graphics drivers - the fastest were the standard Arima drivers (8x.xx series drivers) which get me nearly 10k in 3DMark. The slowest by some 700 points were the latest Xtreme-G MobileForce 91.3x drivers from TweaksRUs.

What's especially weird about that is that a colleague of mine who has an XPS M1710 (single 7900 GTX 512Mb) gets exactly the opposite result - best scores with the latest drivers.

Perhaps SLi optimisations, or perhaps Arima have done some other tweaking to the drivers..
post #22 of 62
Thread Starter 
And now...

Ok, so the 3DMark benchmarks I've run so far, ordered by fastest first

1) The Arima nForce platform drivers, Arima nVidia ForceWare 84.15 video drivers and Arima supplied AMD Athlon processor driver, stock clocks: 9947


2) Arima nForce platform drivers, Arima nVidia ForceWare video 84.15 drivers and the AMD supplied Turion processor driver, stock clocks: 9935


3) Arima nForce platform drivers, Xtreme-G Mobile ForceWare 84.56, Arima supplied Athlon processor driver, o/c 391MHz core & 520MHz mem: 9931


4) Arima nForce platform drivers, Xtreme-G Mobile ForceWare 84.56 and Arima supplied Athlon processor driver, stock clocks: 9804


5) nVidia nForce4 platform drivers, Xtreme-G Mobile ForceWare 91.37 and AMD Turion processor driver, stock clocks: 9220


6) Arima nForce platform drivers, Xtreme-G Mobile ForceWare 91.31 and Arima supplied Athlon processor driver, stock clocks: 9200



As I said in my previous post - between each benchmark I restored the ghost image which contained no drivers at all so as to avoid any driver contamination, then installed the platform driver (reboot), video driver (reboot) and CPU driver (reboot) in that order, each time, followed by 3DMark05, then another reboot and then ran the test.

The results are... interesting, if nothing else.
post #23 of 62
So wheres the AS5 tutorial?
I thought you said you do one befour HH, if he didnt do one already.
post #24 of 62
Thread Starter 
Damn, just no pleasing some folks

I need to get some additional pics, plus I've only done the CPU so far - I want to do the GPUs as well, then I can get a guide up for all three things
post #25 of 62
Thread Starter 
Oh yes - objective achieved!

My final (for now ) 3DMark05 benchmark is..

10123!



That was achieved using:

Arima nForce platform drivers
Arima nVidia ForceWare drivers (84.15 series)
AMD Athlon CPU driver (1.2.2.2)

GPUs are overclocked to 380/520 from 375/500
FSB is overclocked to 205MHz in SysTool, however SysTool reported my stock 200MHz FSB as 193MHz, so I think it's safe to say I'm actually pushing this right up to 212MHz, which makes an internal clock of 2.544GHz


Pretty happy with that
post #26 of 62
Congratulations... Grrrr...!
post #27 of 62
Thread Starter 
Ok, that's it for now - no more overclocking until I AS5 the GPUs, GPU RAM and SLi chipset!

But, the final score?

10178!

Oh yes..



Almost 214MHz FSB (based on the SysTool inaccuracy again), same GPU clocks, nothing else running but SysTool.

The laptop was sat on my NotePal cooler for this, and there's a fan by the PC on oscillate (for me as well as the PC) as it's 30C (that's 86F) in here right now - not really overclocking weather!
post #28 of 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronjb
Damn, just no pleasing some folks
How about some pleasing 06 scores?
post #29 of 62
Thread Starter 
Well, 06 scores are a little disappointing so far - perhaps the newer drivers would favour 06..

But a non overclocked result on a full XP install with nothing removed - 3208

Kinda disappointing - far, far less than the Dell owners get with 7900GTX's in the XPS M1710..
post #30 of 62
Well if i remeber correctly 06 tests for dual core, so single core actualy hurts performance reason why most poeple dont count them becuase games right now dont use dual core.
post #31 of 62
Quote:
But a non overclocked result on a full XP install with nothing removed - 3208

there is something very wrong with that score, even with a single core processor.
post #32 of 62
Thread Starter 
Yep - and I think it's the drivers that are on the Arima CD.. 3DMark06 seems to hate them..

Switching to the 91.xx series drivers (which aren't so good for 05) produced scores up near 6000, and the latest 84.xx series drivers produces scores not far below that.

Currently running some more benchmarks, so I'll have some 06 benchmarks and updated 05's (with no overclocking - I've proved my point with 10178 for now ) to post, along with the VGA BIOS and system BIOS images.
post #33 of 62
Thread Starter 
Ok, and here's some 3DMark06 scores, plus some new 05 scores with no overclocking and some image quality options toggled (yeah, I was bored )

These were all run on the following setup:
Bare XP install created with nLite
nVidia nForce platform drivers 6.86
AMD processor driver 1.3.2.0
Xtreme-G MobileForce 84.56

3DMark05 @ 1024x768, noAA, Ansitropic off: 9823


3DMark05 @ 1920x1200, noAA, Ansitropic off: 7893


3DMark05 @ 1024x768, 4xAA, Ansitropic on max: 6488


3DMark06 @ default settings (trial copy): 5158



Now - an interesting point to note.. I was getting much higher 3DMark06 scores when I used the 91.31 or 91.37 drivers, however they seem to have an 'issue'.. I could only run 3DMark06 once before I had to reboot - failing to reboot would lead to a BSOD citing the fact that a driver had gone into an infinite loop - the driver being nv4_disp.dll.

Pretty sure it was the drivers and not heat, incidentally, as I could let everything cool right down and try a second time and still, blammo, lockup..


Now - BIOS images for the curious. Note, if you blow up your laptop, render it inoperable or manage to dismember your own limbs with these images it was not my fault

nVidia 7900GS 512Mb BIOS ver 5.71.22.26.17: http://dev.mind-design.co.uk/7900gs_...1.22.26.17.rom

I'd be interested to know what BIOS versions you guys see in NiBitor..

Main system BIOS by American Megatrends: http://dev.mind-design.co.uk/w830-da.rom
post #34 of 62
aaronjb what graphics card do you have in your system again?
post #35 of 62
hes got the 7900gs 512mb's in SLI
post #36 of 62
Well I'm pretty sure that 91.xx drivers are not all that compatible with the 7900 gs. He should only use the 84.xx drivers.
post #37 of 62
now i'm interested to see what an m9700 will do with the 256mb 7900gs in 3dmark 06 with the aw drivers as compared to your setup
post #38 of 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carter
now i'm interested to see what an m9700 will do with the 256mb 7900gs in 3dmark 06 with the aw drivers as compared to your setup

I'll be running 512mb 7900gs's in my system once it gets here... I'll do some runs with the AW driver. There is one difference between the Evesham aaronjb bought and the Alienware other than bios' and drivers, the Evesham uses 333MHz memory when Alienware is using 400MHz. Not sure it'll make much of a difference though but we'll see.

The AW drivers are just Nvidia drivers that AW has tested and certified, there's nothing custom about them other than the system bios does some sort of check to make sure they're AW certified. You won't be able to load the standard Nvidia drivers on your Alienware with the standard bios'.
post #39 of 62
hmm ok thats interesting, well, I'm still interested to see the scores :P
itll be one of the first things i do after i've got my alien up and running
post #40 of 62
Thread Starter 
Ok, an update for all you folks wanting to overclock your m9700's..

I can categorically state that the lockdown isn't in the Alienware-supplied video drivers, as I downloaded the AW 84.74 drivers this afternoon and tried them on a fresh XP install - CoolBits enabled the OC options and I could happily overclock, though only 20Mhz or so Honestly, it's not worth the trouble, 20MHz nets you absolutely nothing frame-rate wise.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Other Brand Notebook Reviews