yea but look says aa and HDR was on, thats HUGE Difference in graphics.
post #21 of 27
7/26/06 at 3:50pm
Originally Posted by Rockinfella2k
Umm 1 7950 is 640, and 440 for a 7900 gtx, so no they don't cost the same, by quite a bit.
Originally Posted by kesmith
If a single 7900gtx can run HL2:E1 at 1600x1200 with AA and HDR on at 70 fps, I think any further discussion is moot until they invent optic implants that allow us to see at faster than 25fps. I just thought it was kinda fishy, but I ran a stress test on my 7900gt in HL2, and put on net_graph during CS:S with all detail on, and it runs faster than 70fps... Pretty dang impressive. I'll just wait until the makers of FarCry up the bar with that new game they're working on, whatever it's called, and wait for Half-Life 3 before axing my 7800GTX SLI setup.
A kind of dumb question though... once in a blue moon, I do encounter a slowdown, mostly in Oblivion when there's a ton of lighting effects, or lit fog or something. If I were to INCREASE the AA and HDR type stuff, would it actually make it run faster since I'm in SLI? Everyone always says that having SLI is worthless unless you run high detail, so thought I'd throw that out there, even though I'm pretty sure I know the answer already.