New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

p105-s9312 Benchmarks

post #1 of 34
Thread Starter 
Well guys, I have had my P105-S9312 for about a month. I figured that I would post the system benchmarks on here for you guys. 3dMark05, and 3dMark06. Everything on it is stock, and it hasnt been overclocked or anything. I have been extremely happy with this laptop. It is a wonderful piece of equipment. My only real complaint is that the battery life zapps itself anytime you run a 3d application. and occasionally i get momentary lagging while programs are operating. I am assuming that this is based upon the 4200rpm hdd. Its a great machine though. Enjoy, oh and a final word. If you are planning on buying a new laptop. Do yourself a favor, and get this one. You wont regret it.



3dMark05 -
System Configuration


General Information
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP

DirectX Version 9.0c

Mobo Manufacturer fL

Mobo Model F

AGP Rates (Current/Available) N/A / N/A

CPU Intel Core 2007 MHz

FSB 0 MHz

Memory 2046 MB



Display Information
Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS

Driver Name NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS

Driver Version 8.4.0.0

Driver Status WHQL - Not FM Approved

Video Memory 256 MB

Core Clock N/A

Memory Clock N/A



Benchmark Settings
Program Version 3DMark05 Revision 2 Build 0

Resolution 1024x768@32 bit

Anti-Aliasing None

Texture Filtering Optimal

Vertex Shader Profile 3_0

Pixel Shader Profile 3_0

Force Full Precision Off

Disable DST Off

Disable Post-processing Off

Force Software Vertex Shaders Off

Color Mipmaps Off

Repeat Count Off



Main Test Results
3DMark Score 6075 3DMarks

CPU Score 5722 CPUMarks



Detailed Test Results


Game Tests
GT1 - Return To Proxycon 26.3 fps

GT2 - Firefly Forest 18.4 fps

GT3 - Canyon Flight 29.6 fps



CPU Tests
CPU Test 1 2.9 fps

CPU Test 2 5.0 fps



Feature Tests
Fill Rate - Single-Texturing N/A

Fill Rate - Multi-Texturing N/A

Pixel Shader N/A

Vertex Shader - Simple N/A

Vertex Shader - Complex N/A



Batch Size Tests
8 Triangles N/A

32 Triangles N/A

128 Triangles N/A

512 Triangles N/A

2048 Triangles N/A

32768 Triangles N/A





3dMark06 -

System and CPU Information
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP

DirectX Version 9.0c

Mobo Manufacturer TOSHIBA

Mobo Model Satellite P105

AGP Rates (Current/Available) 16x / N/A

CPU Intel Core 2003 MHz

Physical / Logical CPUs 1 / 2

MultiCore 2 Processor Cores

HyperThreading Not Available

FSB 166 MHz

Memory 2032 MB



Display Information
Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS

Driver Name NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS

Driver Version 8.4.0.0

Driver Status WHQL - Not FM Approved

Co-operative adapters No

Video Memory 256 MB

Core Clock N/A

Memory Clock N/A



Benchmark Settings
Default Settings Custom

Program Version 3DMark06 Revision 0 Build 2

Resolution 1280x800

Anti-Aliasing None

Texture Filtering Optimal

Vertex Shader Profile 3_0

Pixel Shader Profile 3_0

Force Full Precision No

Disable Post-processing No

Force Software Vertex Shaders No

Force Software FP Filtering No

Disable HW Shadow Mapping No

Color Mipmaps No

Repeat Count Off

Fixed Framerate Off



Main Test Results
3DMark Score 3833 3DMarks

SM 2.0 Score 1502 Marks

SM 3.0 Score 1520 Marks

CPU Score 1674 Marks



Detailed Test Results


Graphics Tests
1 - Return to Proxycon 12.146 FPS

2 - Firefly Forest 12.886 FPS



CPU Tests
CPU1 - Red Valley 0.531 FPS

CPU2 - Red Valley 0.845 FPS



HDR Tests
1 - Canyon Flight (SM 3.0) 13.358 FPS

2 - Deep Freeze (SM 3.0) 17.032 FPS



Feature Tests
Fill Rate - Single Texturing N/A

Fill Rate - Multi Texturing N/A

Pixel Shader N/A

Vertex Shader - Simple N/A

Vertex Shader - Complex N/A

Shader Particles (SM 3.0) N/A

Perlin Noise (SM 3.0) N/A



Batch Size Tests
8 Triangles N/A

32 Triangles N/A

128 Triangles N/A

512 Triangles N/A

2048 Triangles N/A

32768 Triangles N/A
post #2 of 34
Thread Starter 
hey how big are y'alls HDD's showing as? I am getting about 186Gig. I love the way that manufacturers say HDD size, and that is pre-partitioning i suppose. I have a 320GB in my desktop, and it only has about 300GB allowable. Let me know whawt y'all think.
post #3 of 34
HD manufaturers and operating systems count the number of bytes in a GB differently.

For HDD's 1 GB is 1 billion bytes (which would be 1000^3). THerefore a 200GBdrive contians 200,000,000,000 bytes.

In Windows, 1 GB is actually 1024^3 which translates to 1,073,741,824. Therefore the 200billion bytes divided by this number leaves you with 186.26 GB as they are seen by the operating system.

In other words it's totally normal, it's like one is measuring in inches and the other in cm. The overall size is the same, but the numbers they come up with are different.
post #4 of 34
That seems really odd that the 3DMark05 score is 6075 for this model, when it seems like the standard P105-S921 got a 6202 (according to the 3DMark05 scores listed over on notebookreview.com). What do you suppose accounts for that? I mean, the P105-S9312 has a faster processor, twice the RAM..... the only negative I see is a 4200rpm HD instead of a 5400rpm HD, but it still doesn't quite make sense to me.
post #5 of 34
Thread Starter 
thanks for the info.
post #6 of 34
Thread Starter 
Ya know thats a good question. I only ran the clock on this machine once. It may have been off power at the time to. which would account. I will give it another go, and keep you posted. JEM
post #7 of 34
Thread Starter 
new mark is 6137 but thats without dumping all of the non essential programs and stuff prior to running. and i have a bunch of processes running, such as Steam, Harmony, Etc.
post #8 of 34
Thread Starter 
upgraded drivers closed programs etc. 6182. Leaves me to believe one of two things. Mine is under performing, or the test machine was overclocked. Ether way, I am happy with my scores.. Would be interesting to find out what others are getting. JEM
post #9 of 34
Is that with the Antivirus disabled?

Either way, 20 points is not worth worrying about. Might even be the 4200rpm HDD. Looks purdy damn good to me (note: I have the Intel "Extreme Graphics 2")!
post #10 of 34
Thread Starter 
I am definatly happy with it.
post #11 of 34
i ordered one for myself and hope it will be better choice for that money at the moment. could you guys check the 3dmark01 score too please?
post #12 of 34
Well I should let you all know that I updated to the laptopvideo2go drivers and I am scoring 6321. I am really begining to believe that the above mentioned S291 was overclocked. I have checked the scores of other S291's and they are getting around 5200 - 5600 with no overclocks.
post #13 of 34
Thread Starter 
hey man, i tried running the go drivers from the nvidia website, and it gave me an error saying the card type was not supported. Where did you get the udated drivers? Thanks.
post #14 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by elcid79
hey man, i tried running the go drivers from the nvidia website, and it gave me an error saying the card type was not supported. Where did you get the udated drivers? Thanks.
the nvidia drivers on their site are for a select few laptops. go to www.laptopvideo2go.com. You will need to download a modified .inf file and the nvidia drivers. they have all the directions for using their drivers on the site. Gave me quite a large boost in performance
post #15 of 34
Pharoke,

Could you tell me the exact number or code of the driver you downloaded? I tried reading those guides but they are not very clear. Could you maybe give a detailed explanation on what to do? I am sorry for being such a noob...

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,

Lionel
post #16 of 34
Thread Starter 
i will second that. I went to there website, and I am all sorts of confused as to where we get the inf file. i have the newest drivers off of the nvidia website but i iwll be damned if i know how to install. haha Thanks, JEM
post #17 of 34
Link to inf and driver page.

Link to instruction page.

Hope this helps and sorry it took me so long to get back to you guys
post #18 of 34
Pharoke,

I know this is ridiculous, but those guides you linked us are the ones we were talking about. They are very unclear and confusing. Can't you give us the number of the driver?
post #19 of 34
The driver I am using from them is the 91.45, download it and the matching INF file from their driver site. Instructions as follows
Quote:
Basically it's a 3-step process: 1. Download driver, double click and select extract, 2. Download modded INF and replace original INF in extracted folder, 3. Install & reboot. When you open a driver thread, you will see several links like IPB ImageDriver | IPB ImageModded INF, which are all you need to install the driver you want. First click Driver link to download the related driver which comes WITHOUT the needed INF file. For example, if you choose 84.25 driver to install, driver file will be 8425.exe and when extracted it should create another folder named 8425. Next step is getting the Modded INF and replacing the old one. Click on the Modded INF link to download the file. If file opens instead of downloading go back, right click the link and choose 'Save target as...' or 'Save link as' options. Now it should ask where to download the file. Select the 8425 folder. If you did it right, there should be a file replacement confirmation dialogue. Replace the file and you are now ready to install the driver.
post #20 of 34
Is this considered overclocking? In other words, does installing this driver void the warranty?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Toshiba Notebook Benchmarks