Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aussie
Objective-C (insert Homer Simpson drooling sounds here...)
I just wish it would have taken off instead of C++.
We would be lightyears ahead in programming by now if it had.
C++ should have been aborted inside of Stroustrup's head imho  .
|
Funny, Aussies statements were exactly like my thoughts related to that ObjC vs. C++ theme here...
But sadly the AT&T Bell Labs were a much much greater mighty authority than the Stepstone Corporation (Brad Cox, Andrew Novobilsky and Co.) or NeXT's ObjC evangelists those days. So the more cryptic and complicated blown up prog language was pushed much more than the little elegant and pragmatic one.
However, today we have instead the Java vs. C# war, which both have stolen many of the good concepts from all other former plain OO and hybrid OO prog languages like Smalltalk, Eiffel, ObjC, C++ ...and so on...
Quote:
I agree about the speed up effect, what is more noticable is not so much the speed up but the multi-tasking behaviour. The system "feels" (no I don't have benchmarks handy ) more responsive with HT vs non-HT. |
Yep, I can agree with this too here... running multiple apps via the OS multi-tasking capabilities is often better nocticable. Also I think that the overall combination of a HT CPU and PC3200 (200MHz, CL2.5) dual channel RAM modules etc. will speed things somehow up here. This can so far only be advanced somehow further by using one of those bloody expensive "extreme edition" CPUs, which undoubtly have those mighty kicking in caching benefits.